Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Jacob Lee
Been doing UCC searches for 15 years and Texas is definitely one of the more challenging states. The key is being methodical and not rushing. For a $2.8M deal, consider hiring a professional search company if you're not 100% confident in your results.
Jacob Lee
•There are several good ones. CT Corporation and National Corporate Research are reliable, though they can be pricey.
For that size deal, the cost of a professional search is worth the peace of mind.
Last month I used Certana.ai after missing a continuation filing in a manual search. The tool caught it immediately when I uploaded the original UCC-1 and the continuation - showed me exactly where the names didn't match perfectly. Really wish I'd known about it sooner.
Jibriel Kohn
•That's exactly the kind of thing I'm worried about missing. How much does something like that cost?
The value is definitely there when you consider the alternative of missing a lien on a multi-million dollar transaction.
Join the conversation
Bottom line - don't trust wiki sources for UCC legal advice. Get proper legal counsel if you're dealing with complex commercial transactions. The internet is full of half-truths and sovereign citizen nonsense when it comes to UCC 1-308.
Agreed. Wikipedia and similar sources are starting points for research, not definitive legal guidance.
Especially for UCC stuff. Too much misinformation out there.
Thanks everyone for the clarification. I'll advise my client that UCC 1-308 doesn't apply to financing statements and any rights they want to preserve need to be handled in the underlying agreements, not the UCC-1 filing. Sounds like I need to educate them about the difference between the financing statement and the actual security agreement.
Good call. That distinction trips up a lot of people. The UCC-1 is just public notice, not where you negotiate deal terms.
Glad we could help clear up the confusion. Those wiki articles really do more harm than good sometimes.
Join the conversation
UPDATE: Thanks everyone for the advice! I revised my collateral description using the suggestions here and the filing was accepted. Used the more specific language about accounts receivable vs. deposit accounts and that seemed to do the trick. Really appreciate all the help - this forum is a lifesaver!
Glad the specific language approach worked for you. It's becoming the new standard unfortunately.
Aaron Lee
•This whole thread was super helpful. I'm bookmarking it for when I run into the same issue.
For anyone else reading this thread later - the key takeaway is that UCC accounts definition needs to be specific about what types of payment rights you're covering. Generic language like 'all accounts' isn't enough anymore. Be prepared to distinguish between accounts receivable, deposit accounts, and other payment intangibles.
This should be pinned at the top of the forum. So many people struggle with this exact issue.
Natalie Wang
•Seriously, the UCC rules around accounts are way more complex than they seem at first glance.
Join the conversation
Have you considered hiring a professional UCC search company? For major acquisitions, it might be worth the cost to have someone experienced handle the comprehensive search rather than trying to do it yourself.
I'm thinking about it, especially after seeing how complex this is getting. Any recommendations for good search companies?
Emma Wilson
•CT Corporation and CSC are both solid choices for comprehensive UCC searches. They handle the multi-state and name variation issues professionally.
QuantumLeap
Whatever you do, document everything for your due diligence file. Keep screenshots of your searches, note which databases you checked, and list all the name variations you used. Your attorney will thank you later.
Smart approach. Also date-stamp everything since UCC filings can change daily.
And don't forget to search right up to closing. New filings can appear at any time during the due diligence period.
Daniel Rogers
Final suggestion - before you submit anything, print out the PDF and compare it character by character to your original document. I know it sounds tedious but it's caught several debtor name discrepancies for me that would have caused rejections.
0 coins
Michael Adams
•That's actually a really good idea. I'll try that with my next filing.
0 coins
Noah Torres
•Or use automated verification - less tedious and more thorough than manual checking.
0 coins
Aaliyah Reed
UPDATE: Tried the font change suggestion and switched to Times New Roman, plus used PDF/A format. Filing went through successfully! Thanks everyone for the help with these PDF formatting issues.
0 coins
Michael Adams
•Great news! I'm going to try the same approach with my filing.
0 coins
Ryan Young
•Perfect example of why document verification is so important. Small formatting details can make or break a filing.
0 coins