Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Have you considered hiring a professional UCC search company? For major acquisitions, it might be worth the cost to have someone experienced handle the comprehensive search rather than trying to do it yourself.
I'm thinking about it, especially after seeing how complex this is getting. Any recommendations for good search companies?
Emma Wilson
•CT Corporation and CSC are both solid choices for comprehensive UCC searches. They handle the multi-state and name variation issues professionally.
QuantumLeap
Whatever you do, document everything for your due diligence file. Keep screenshots of your searches, note which databases you checked, and list all the name variations you used. Your attorney will thank you later.
Smart approach. Also date-stamp everything since UCC filings can change daily.
And don't forget to search right up to closing. New filings can appear at any time during the due diligence period.
Join the conversation
Bottom line - don't trust wiki sources for UCC legal advice. Get proper legal counsel if you're dealing with complex commercial transactions. The internet is full of half-truths and sovereign citizen nonsense when it comes to UCC 1-308.
Agreed. Wikipedia and similar sources are starting points for research, not definitive legal guidance.
Especially for UCC stuff. Too much misinformation out there.
Thanks everyone for the clarification. I'll advise my client that UCC 1-308 doesn't apply to financing statements and any rights they want to preserve need to be handled in the underlying agreements, not the UCC-1 filing. Sounds like I need to educate them about the difference between the financing statement and the actual security agreement.
Good call. That distinction trips up a lot of people. The UCC-1 is just public notice, not where you negotiate deal terms.
Glad we could help clear up the confusion. Those wiki articles really do more harm than good sometimes.
Join the conversation
This thread is making me nervous about our own Indiana filings. Maybe I should run a comprehensive search on our entire portfolio to make sure we're not missing anything.
Romeo Quest
•That's not a bad idea. Better to find problems now than during a workout situation.
Gabriel Ruiz
•Yeah, that's exactly what prompted this post. Routine audit turned up these discrepancies and now I'm questioning everything.
Val Rossi
UPDATE: I ended up requesting certified copies of all our continuation filings from Indiana SOS. Turns out three of them had minor debtor name discrepancies that were preventing them from linking properly in the search system. The filings were valid but the names didn't match exactly. Used one of the document checking tools mentioned here to verify everything is consistent now. Thanks for all the advice!
Perfect example of why document verification is so important. Those small name differences can cause major problems if you don't catch them.
Eve Freeman
•Thanks for the update. This whole thread has been really educational about Indiana's filing quirks.
Join the conversation
Amara Chukwu
One thing nobody mentioned - make sure you're using the correct UCC-3 form and checking the 'continuation' box. Sounds obvious but I've seen people accidentally file amendments instead of continuations.
This happened to someone in my office last month. They filed an amendment thinking it was a continuation and had to scramble to file the correct form.
Amara Chukwu
•Yeah, those checkbox mistakes are brutal because you don't realize the error until you're trying to figure out why your UCC is still showing as expired.
Update for anyone following this thread - I ended up filing the continuation yesterday using one of those document checkers mentioned earlier. Caught a small typo in the debtor name that would have definitely caused a rejection. Form was accepted this morning. Thanks everyone for the advice!
Which document checker did you end up using? Always curious to hear about people's experiences with different tools.
Used Certana.ai - really straightforward process and definitely worth it for the peace of mind on these continuation filings.
Kingston Bellamy
Update for anyone following this thread - I ended up doing a combination approach. Did multiple name variation searches on the Arizona portal, requested a certified search from the state, and had the borrower provide copies of all UCC documents they had. Found out there were actually 4 active liens, not the 1 the borrower claimed. Two were properly terminated but the termination statements hadn't been processed yet by the state, and one was against a related entity with a very similar name. Glad I was thorough because this could have been a disaster.
0 coins
Kiara Greene
•Did you end up proceeding with the loan after finding all those additional liens?
0 coins
Kingston Bellamy
•We restructured the deal to account for the existing liens and required payoffs of two of them at closing. More complicated but still doable.
0 coins
Evelyn Kelly
This whole thread is a great example of why UCC searches are both critically important and incredibly frustrating. Every state has its own quirks and Arizona is definitely one of the more challenging ones. Thanks for sharing your experience - it'll help others avoid similar problems.
0 coins
Paloma Clark
•Agreed. These real-world examples are way more helpful than the generic guidance you usually find online.
0 coins
Heather Tyson
•Should be required reading for anyone doing commercial lending in Arizona!
0 coins