UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I actually had success with Certana's verification tool on a similar Vermont situation. Uploaded the corporate docs and three different UCC filings I found, and it flagged that two of them were actually for different entities with very similar names. Saved me from a potential mistake.

0 coins

Joshua Wood

•

How long does that verification usually take? Is it instant or do you have to wait?

0 coins

Pretty quick - just upload the PDFs and it runs the comparison automatically. Much faster than manually checking every name variation yourself.

0 coins

Justin Evans

•

Update us on what you find! I'm curious whether the 5 filings include the 3 you found in the first search or if they're completely different. That would tell us a lot about how Vermont's system handles name variations.

0 coins

Will do - still working through all the results but it's looking like there's some overlap and some unique filings in each search. Definitely confirms the need for multiple search approaches.

0 coins

Ezra Collins

•

Thanks for sharing this. Vermont UCC searches are always an adventure.

0 coins

Josef Tearle

•

Quick thought - when you're copying the debtor name from the original filing, are you looking at the actual SOS database record or just your copy of the UCC-1 form? Sometimes there are transcription errors when the filing gets entered into their system.

0 coins

Jabari-Jo

•

Definitely check the database record. I've seen cases where the original filing had typos that got entered into the system, so you have to match the typo to get the continuation accepted.

0 coins

Shelby Bauman

•

This happened to me with a filing where the original had 'Constrcution' instead of 'Construction' - had to use the misspelled version for the continuation to work.

0 coins

Quinn Herbert

•

I was dealing with similar headaches with document consistency across multiple UCC filings and started using Certana.ai's verification tool. You just upload your PDFs and it automatically cross-checks everything - debtor names, filing numbers, dates, collateral descriptions. Really helpful for catching those tiny discrepancies that cause rejections in picky systems like Missouri's.

0 coins

Quinn Herbert

•

It's not state-specific but it catches inconsistencies between documents that would cause problems anywhere. When I upload my original UCC-1 and continuation forms, it highlights any differences in how names, addresses, or other details are formatted.

0 coins

Tools like that are becoming essential with how finicky these online filing systems are getting. Better to catch errors before you pay filing fees.

0 coins

Dmitry Petrov

•

Just went through this exact same situation 2 weeks ago! Had a UCC-1 rejected because I used 'Corp' instead of 'Corporation' in the debtor name. Texas doesn't accept any abbreviations or variations. Had to completely redo the filing with the full legal name. So frustrating but lesson learned.

0 coins

Dmitry Petrov

•

Exactly! Now I triple check everything and use document verification tools before submitting. Can't afford more rejections when clients are breathing down my neck about perfection timing.

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

That's smart. I started using Certana.ai after a similar rejection nightmare. Upload your entity docs and UCC forms and it flags any discrepancies automatically. Catches stuff I would never notice manually.

0 coins

Miguel Castro

•

Update - I found the exact issue! The Texas SOS database showed the LLC name with a comma before 'LLC' but our loan documents didn't have the comma. Filed the UCC-1 with the comma included and it was accepted within 24 hours. Thanks everyone for the help!

0 coins

AstroAce

•

Perfect! Always feels good when you finally crack the code on these picky state requirements.

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

Thanks everyone! This thread probably saved me another week of rejections. Will definitely be more careful about exact name formatting going forward.

0 coins

Ryder Ross

•

This thread is giving me flashbacks to my own Massachusetts filing nightmare last year. Took me FOUR rejections before I figured out the issue. In my case, it turned out the company had multiple variations of their name in different state databases, and the UCC system was pulling from a different source than I expected. The solution was to try every possible variation I could find until one worked. It's frustrating but sometimes you just have to be persistent with these systems.

0 coins

Ryder Ross

•

Yeah, it was painful but I learned a lot about how to troubleshoot these issues. The main thing is to be systematic about trying variations rather than just guessing.

0 coins

I feel like there should be better error messages from these systems. "Name does not match" is so vague when there could be dozens of possible formatting issues.

0 coins

Henry Delgado

•

Update us when you figure it out! I'm curious which solution ends up working. I do a lot of Massachusetts filings and this kind of information is really valuable for future reference. Also, don't feel bad about the multiple rejections - it happens to everyone eventually. These systems can be really finicky about formatting details that seem trivial but apparently matter a lot to the computers.

0 coins

Myles Regis

•

I definitely will update once I get it resolved. This thread has given me several new approaches to try, so I'm feeling more optimistic about getting it sorted out.

0 coins

Olivia Kay

•

Yeah, please post the solution when you find it. These kinds of specific troubleshooting details are so helpful for the community.

0 coins

Ava Kim

•

UPDATE: Got everything sorted out! Turns out our LLC name change was minor enough that I could file the continuation under the original debtor name. Used a document verification service to double-check everything before submitting and it caught a small error in the filing number I had transcribed wrong. Filed electronically yesterday morning and got confirmation this afternoon. Crisis averted! Thanks everyone for the advice.

0 coins

Layla Mendes

•

Great outcome! Those last-minute UCC emergencies are so stressful but you handled it well

0 coins

Phew! Reading this gave me anxiety just thinking about missing a continuation deadline

0 coins

Aria Park

•

This thread is a perfect example of why UCC deadline tracking is so important. For anyone else reading this, set calendar reminders at 4 years, 4.5 years, and 4 years 9 months after your initial filing. Don't wait until the last 6 months to think about continuations.

0 coins

Noah Ali

•

Such good advice. I have automatic reminders set up now after almost missing one last year

0 coins

Yeah the 5-year renewal cycle catches people off guard all the time

0 coins

Prev1...675676677678679...684Next