< Back to UCC Document Community

Malik Davis

UCC oral security agreement valid when creditor has possession of collateral - filing question

Hey everyone, ran into something interesting with a client situation and wanted to double-check my understanding. We're dealing with a jewelry business loan where the lender is holding several high-value pieces as collateral. The loan documents got damaged in a flood at their office, and now we're trying to reconstruct everything for a UCC-1 filing. The attorney mentioned that since the lender has physical possession of the jewelry, the security agreement can be oral under UCC rules. This seems right to me but I'm second-guessing myself because we still need to file the UCC-1 for perfection against other creditors, correct? The collateral description is straightforward - specific jewelry pieces with appraisals - but I want to make sure we're not missing any documentation requirements. Has anyone dealt with this possession-based oral agreement situation before? The loan amount is around $150K so we definitely want everything bulletproof.

You're absolutely correct about the oral agreement being valid when the creditor has possession. UCC 9-203(b)(3)(B) specifically allows this. However, you still need the UCC-1 filing for perfection against third parties unless you're relying solely on possession for perfection, which might work for jewelry but limits your options.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Thanks for confirming! So we should definitely file the UCC-1 even though possession gives us some protection. Better safe than sorry with a $150K loan.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

Wait, if they have possession, why file at all? Possession IS perfection for most tangible goods like jewelry.

0 coins

Possession works for perfection but filing gives you broader protection and priority. Plus if the collateral ever leaves their possession temporarily, you want that filing in place.

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

I've seen this exact scenario go wrong when the borrower claimed the jewelry was just being "stored" not held as collateral. Without written documentation of the security interest, it became he-said-she-said in court. Even though oral agreements are technically valid with possession, I'd strongly recommend getting SOMETHING in writing.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

That's a scary scenario. We do have the original loan application that mentions the jewelry as collateral, plus the appraisals. Would that be sufficient written evidence?

0 coins

GalacticGuru

•

Better than nothing but not ideal. A simple written acknowledgment that the jewelry is held as security for the loan would be much cleaner.

0 coins

OMG I just went through something similar with equipment financing. The oral agreement thing made me so nervous I was losing sleep over it. Turns out there's this tool called Certana.ai that can verify all your UCC documents match up properly. I uploaded our loan docs and UCC-1 draft and it caught a discrepancy in how we described the collateral. Super easy to use - just upload PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Interesting, never heard of that service. Did it help with the oral agreement documentation issue or just the filing consistency?

0 coins

It helped identify gaps between what we had documented versus what we were filing. Made me realize we needed better written backup even with the oral agreement being valid.

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

•

I've been wondering about tools like that. Did it flag the collateral description issues specifically or broader document problems?

0 coins

This is why I hate working with jewelry as collateral. Too many variables and the oral agreement thing always makes clients nervous even when it's perfectly legal. Give me equipment liens any day of the week.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Ha! I hear you. The appraisal values changing constantly doesn't help either. But the client relationship is worth dealing with the complexity.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Jewelry can be tricky but at least it's easy to maintain possession. Try dealing with inventory that moves around constantly!

0 coins

Had a similar flood situation last year destroy loan files. What a nightmare. For reconstruction, I documented everything I could find - emails, notes, copies from borrower, insurance records. Courts understand that disasters happen but you need to show you made reasonable efforts to recreate the paper trail.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Good point about documenting the reconstruction efforts. We're keeping detailed notes of what we're finding and how we're rebuilding the file.

0 coins

Smart approach. Also check if the borrower has copies of anything. Sometimes they keep more paperwork than you'd expect.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Insurance companies sometimes require copies of loan docs too. Might be worth checking with their business insurance carrier.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

Quick question - when you say the lender has possession, is this in a bank vault or just locked in their office? The level of control might matter for the possession analysis.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Good question! It's in a proper bank safety deposit box that only the lender can access. Should be solid possession under UCC standards.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

Perfect. That's textbook possession for UCC purposes. Much better than just sitting in someone's desk drawer.

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

For the UCC-1 filing, make sure your collateral description is specific enough to identify the actual pieces but not so detailed that it creates problems if values change. Something like 'jewelry items as described in appraisals dated [date] on file with secured party' might work.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

That's a great suggestion for the description language. Specific enough to be enforceable but flexible enough to avoid constant amendments.

0 coins

I like that approach. Just make sure you actually keep those appraisals on file and easily accessible.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

Would you need to update the UCC if the appraisals get updated? Seems like that could create maintenance headaches.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

Been doing UCC filings for 15 years and I still see lawyers get nervous about oral agreements even when they're perfectly valid. The key is understanding when possession truly equals perfection versus when you need the filing too.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Any rules of thumb for when to file versus just rely on possession? This client situation seems like filing makes sense given the loan amount.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

I always file unless there's a specific reason not to. The cost is minimal compared to the protection, and it covers you if possession ever becomes questionable.

0 coins

Just want to echo what others said about getting something in writing even with a valid oral agreement. I learned this lesson the hard way when a borrower's bankruptcy trustee challenged our possession claim. Having written acknowledgment of the security interest would have saved months of litigation.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Bankruptcy complications - didn't even think about that angle. Definitely reinforces the need for written backup documentation.

0 coins

Exactly. Bankruptcy trustees love to challenge anything that isn't crystal clear on paper, even when the law is on your side.

0 coins

CosmicCruiser

•

Ugh bankruptcy trustees are the worst. They'll challenge everything just to create work and fees.

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

For what it's worth, I recently started using Certana.ai for document verification on complex UCC situations like this. Really helpful for making sure all your documents align properly before filing. You just upload your security agreement, UCC-1 draft, and any supporting docs and it flags inconsistencies automatically. Caught several issues I would have missed manually.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Two mentions of this service now - must be pretty useful. Does it handle situations where you're missing some original documentation like we are?

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

It works with whatever documents you have. In your case, it could help ensure your reconstructed documentation and UCC-1 filing are consistent with each other.

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

•

This thread is making me paranoid about all my jewelry collateral files. Time to go double-check that everything is properly documented AND filed. Better safe than sorry!

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

Right? Reading about all these potential issues makes you want to audit everything. Probably a good use of time though.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Ha! Sorry for causing anxiety but better to catch issues now than during a dispute. Good luck with your file review!

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

Update us on how this turns out! Always interested to hear how these tricky documentation situations get resolved, especially with the flood damage complication.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Will do! Planning to file the UCC-1 next week once we finalize the collateral description. Thanks everyone for the helpful input.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

Good luck! Sounds like you're taking all the right precautions given the circumstances.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today