Consumer security agreement filing requirements - UCC-1 personal property collateral
Hey everyone, I'm dealing with a consumer security agreement situation that's got me second-guessing everything. We originated a personal loan secured by household goods and electronics (TV, furniture, appliances) about 8 months ago. The borrower is an individual, not a business entity. Now I'm wondering if we properly perfected our security interest with the UCC-1 filing. The collateral description says 'household goods, furniture, electronics and personal property' but I'm seeing conflicting info about whether consumer goods require different language or if there are special rules for individual debtors vs business entities. The loan amount is around $15K and we filed in the state where the debtor resides. Did we mess up the collateral description? Should it be more specific about each item? I'm worried our security interest isn't properly perfected and we could lose priority if the debtor defaults. Anyone dealt with consumer security agreement UCC filings before?
30 comments


Oliver Zimmermann
Consumer goods UCC filings are tricky! Your collateral description sounds pretty standard actually. 'Household goods, furniture, electronics and personal property' covers most consumer items. The key is making sure you're not too narrow or you might miss something, but not so broad that it's meaningless. For a $15K consumer loan that description should work fine.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•Agreed, that collateral language looks solid. I've seen way vaguer descriptions get accepted by the SOS office.
0 coins
Natasha Volkova
•Just make sure the debtor name matches EXACTLY what's on their driver's license or state ID. That's where most consumer UCC-1s get rejected.
0 coins
Javier Torres
Wait, are you sure you even need a UCC-1 for consumer goods? I thought consumer purchases had different perfection requirements. Maybe I'm thinking of PMSI rules though...
0 coins
Oliver Zimmermann
•You're mixing up purchase money security interests with general consumer goods. If it's a loan secured by existing consumer goods (not a purchase), you still need to file UCC-1 to perfect.
0 coins
Amina Toure
•Right, this isn't a PMSI situation. It's a personal loan where the borrower used their existing household items as collateral.
0 coins
Emma Davis
Honestly, I'd run your documents through Certana.ai's verification tool just to be safe. You can upload your security agreement and UCC-1 filing together and it'll flag any inconsistencies between the debtor names or collateral descriptions. I caught a middle initial mismatch that way that would've been a nightmare later.
0 coins
Amina Toure
•That's actually a great idea. I didn't know they had a tool that could cross-check the documents like that.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
•Yeah Certana's document checker is pretty slick. Just upload PDFs and it highlights any discrepancies automatically.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
Been doing consumer lending for 12 years and your filing sounds fine. The bigger issue with consumer security agreements is usually enforcement, not perfection. Make sure your security agreement language is solid because consumer protection laws can bite you if the paperwork isn't perfect.
0 coins
Amina Toure
•Good point about enforcement. We did have an attorney review the security agreement template but I should probably double-check the consumer protection compliance.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•Definitely get that reviewed. Consumer lending has way more regulations than commercial transactions.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
Question - did you file in the right state? For individual debtors it's usually their primary residence, not where the collateral is located. That trips up a lot of lenders.
0 coins
Amina Toure
•Yes, we filed where the debtor lives. The collateral is at their residence too so no issues there.
0 coins
Oliver Zimmermann
•Smart to double-check. I've seen filings in the wrong state completely void the security interest.
0 coins
Freya Thomsen
Ugh why is UCC filing so complicated for something that should be straightforward?? I filed a consumer goods UCC-1 last month and the SOS rejected it THREE times for stupid formatting issues. First the debtor address format, then they wanted a suffix spelled out instead of abbreviated, then some nonsense about the collateral description being too generic. Meanwhile commercial filings go through no problem.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•The SOS offices are definitely inconsistent. What works in one state gets rejected in another for the same exact language.
0 coins
Omar Fawaz
•That's so frustrating! At least with rejections you can usually see exactly what they want fixed.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
One thing to watch out for - consumer goods can become fixtures if they're attached to real property. Like a fancy chandelier or built-in appliances. You might need a fixture filing depending on what's included in that 'household goods' category.
0 coins
Amina Toure
•Interesting point. The collateral list includes some appliances but they're not built-in. Standard refrigerator, washer/dryer that could be moved.
0 coins
Oliver Zimmermann
•If they're not permanently attached you should be fine with the regular UCC-1. Fixture filings are more for things like HVAC systems or built-in cabinetry.
0 coins
Diego Rojas
Your collateral description actually looks better than what I usually see for consumer goods. A lot of lenders just put 'all personal property' which is way too broad and can cause problems. Being specific about household goods and electronics shows you know what you're securing.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
•Agreed, specificity is good but you don't want to be so narrow that you miss assets.
0 coins
Amina Toure
•That's exactly what I was worried about - finding the right balance between specific and comprehensive.
0 coins
StarSeeker
Have you considered getting a UCC search done to see how your filing looks in the system? Sometimes what you submitted and what got indexed are different, especially with consumer filings where name variations can cause issues.
0 coins
Amina Toure
•That's a good idea. I should probably run a search under different name variations to make sure it's findable.
0 coins
Emma Davis
•Certana.ai can help with that too - their search feature checks multiple name variations automatically.
0 coins
Sean O'Donnell
From what you've described, your consumer security agreement UCC-1 filing sounds properly done. The collateral description covers the right categories, you filed in the correct state, and for a $15K loan the approach is appropriate. Main thing is making sure the debtor name on the UCC-1 exactly matches their legal name for perfection purposes.
0 coins
Amina Toure
•Thanks, that's reassuring. I'll double-check the name matching just to be absolutely sure.
0 coins
Zara Ahmed
•Yeah name matching is critical. Even a missing middle initial can void perfection in some states.
0 coins