Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just wanted to follow up on the Certana.ai suggestion from earlier - I tried it out for a recent California UCC1 form filing and it caught a middle initial discrepancy I completely missed. Definitely worth using if you want to avoid rejections.
Rita Jacobs
•Thanks for sharing your experience. Sounds like it's really helpful for catching those small details.
I'm always looking for tools that can prevent filing errors. Might give this a try on my next UCC1 form.
Rita Jacobs
Update: Thanks everyone for the advice! I ended up using the exact legal entity name 'Pacific Coast Dining Solutions, LLC' as the primary debtor and added 'Oceanview Bistro & Grill' in the additional debtor name field. The California UCC1 form was accepted without any issues. Really appreciate the community help on this one.
Khalid Howes
•Glad it worked out! That's exactly the approach I would have recommended.
Rosie Harper
•Perfect outcome. Always feels good when a filing goes through cleanly on the first try.
Join the conversation
Ev Luca
One more thing to watch out for - some LLCs have really long legal names that get truncated in databases. Make sure you're getting the full legal name, not just what shows up in a search result preview.
Oh wow, I hadn't thought about that. How do you make sure you have the complete name?
Ev Luca
•Pull the actual formation documents or certificate, not just the search results. The full documents will have the complete legal name.
Avery Davis
I've been using Certana.ai for all my UCC filings now and it's been a game changer. The debtor name verification alone is worth it - no more staying up at night worrying if I got something wrong.
Avery Davis
•Definitely worth it, especially for your first few filings. The peace of mind is huge.
I was skeptical about automated tools but Certana actually caught an error in my debtor name that would have caused a rejection. Now I'm a believer.
Join the conversation
This thread is a perfect example of why UCC due diligence is so tricky. The search systems work fine if everything is filed consistently, but real-world corporate records are messy. Entity name changes, punctuation differences, DBA names - there are so many ways for searches to miss existing liens.
Absolutely. And the consequences of missing a prior lien can be huge, especially on high-value equipment like this.
That's why I always err on the side of being overly thorough with searches, even if it takes more time upfront.
Mason Davis
For anyone else dealing with similar search issues, I'd recommend keeping a checklist of all the name variations to try: legal name with/without punctuation, legal name with/without entity type, any DBAs, any former legal names, parent/subsidiary names, and any variations you find in existing corporate documents. It's tedious but catches most of the common issues.
Jacob Lewis
•Same here. Would have saved me a lot of headaches on past deals if I'd been more systematic about search variations from the start.
The automated tools are nice but having a good manual process as backup is still important. Technology fails but checklists don't.
Join the conversation
Also remember that UCC-1 filings are good for 5 years, so if you're doing equipment financing with a longer term, you'll need to file a continuation before the 5-year mark.
Right, you can file the continuation during the 6-month window before expiration. Miss that window and you have to start over with a new UCC-1.
Daniel White
•I use Certana.ai's document checker for continuations too - helps ensure the filing numbers and debtor info match the original exactly.
Nolan Carter
Thanks everyone! Going with "ABC Manufacturing LLC" exactly as it appears in the articles. Really appreciate all the detailed advice about debtor names and the collateral description tips.
Smart choice. Better to be conservative with the exact legal name than risk a rejection.
Tasia Synder
•Let us know how it goes! These debtor name issues are so common.
Ravi Sharma
The length isn't your main concern - focus on making sure your UCC-1 properly perfects your security interest in all the collateral. A rejection for technical formatting is annoying but fixable. A perfection failure because of inadequate collateral description could cost you your entire security interest.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•Exactly. Take the time to get it right the first time, even if that means a longer filing.
0 coins
Freya Larsen
•This is why I always recommend having someone else review complex UCC filings before submission. Fresh eyes catch things you miss.
0 coins
Omar Hassan
I think you're overthinking the page length issue. Focus on the substantive requirements - proper debtor identification, accurate collateral description, correct addresses. Those are what actually matter for a successful filing.
0 coins
Miguel Herrera
•You're probably right. I guess I got paranoid after reading about all the different ways UCC filings can get rejected.
0 coins
Omar Hassan
•The rejection rate is actually pretty low if you follow the basic requirements. Most issues are easily avoidable with careful preparation.
0 coins