Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Ev Luca
One more thing to watch out for - some LLCs have really long legal names that get truncated in databases. Make sure you're getting the full legal name, not just what shows up in a search result preview.
Oh wow, I hadn't thought about that. How do you make sure you have the complete name?
Ev Luca
•Pull the actual formation documents or certificate, not just the search results. The full documents will have the complete legal name.
Avery Davis
I've been using Certana.ai for all my UCC filings now and it's been a game changer. The debtor name verification alone is worth it - no more staying up at night worrying if I got something wrong.
Avery Davis
•Definitely worth it, especially for your first few filings. The peace of mind is huge.
I was skeptical about automated tools but Certana actually caught an error in my debtor name that would have caused a rejection. Now I'm a believer.
Join the conversation
This thread is a perfect example of why UCC due diligence is so tricky. The search systems work fine if everything is filed consistently, but real-world corporate records are messy. Entity name changes, punctuation differences, DBA names - there are so many ways for searches to miss existing liens.
Absolutely. And the consequences of missing a prior lien can be huge, especially on high-value equipment like this.
That's why I always err on the side of being overly thorough with searches, even if it takes more time upfront.
Mason Davis
For anyone else dealing with similar search issues, I'd recommend keeping a checklist of all the name variations to try: legal name with/without punctuation, legal name with/without entity type, any DBAs, any former legal names, parent/subsidiary names, and any variations you find in existing corporate documents. It's tedious but catches most of the common issues.
Jacob Lewis
•Same here. Would have saved me a lot of headaches on past deals if I'd been more systematic about search variations from the start.
The automated tools are nice but having a good manual process as backup is still important. Technology fails but checklists don't.
Join the conversation
UPDATE: Finally got it resolved! Turned out there was indeed an extra space in the company name that wasn't visible. Used one of those document verification tools someone mentioned (Certana.ai) and it immediately flagged the spacing issue. Filed this morning and got acceptance confirmation within 2 hours. Crisis averted!
Edwards Hugo
•That's exactly what happened to me! Those document consistency tools are lifesavers for catching things like that.
Great outcome! Secretary of state UCC systems really need better error messages to help people identify these formatting issues.
Tasia Synder
This thread is gold! Bookmarking for future reference. Secretary of state UCC filings shouldn't be this complicated but at least now I know some troubleshooting strategies.
Agreed, super helpful discussion. The document verification tip especially.
Alfredo Lugo
•Wish I had found this info during my three-day rejection nightmare last month!
Join the conversation
This is making me nervous about our own filings now. We have several California UCC continuations coming up this year and I hadn't thought about checking for these kinds of name variations.
It's always good to review your original filings well before the continuation deadline. Gives you time to address any issues.
Yeah, I'm definitely going to pull all our original filings and double-check the names against our current loan documents.
Nia Williams
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Nevada and curious how the California approach works out.
Will do. Planning to file the continuation tomorrow morning using the exact original name format, then worry about the amendment afterwards.
Nia Williams
•Smart plan. Looking forward to hearing how it goes.
Dallas Villalobos
Just wanted to follow up on the Certana.ai suggestion from earlier - I tried it out for a recent California UCC1 form filing and it caught a middle initial discrepancy I completely missed. Definitely worth using if you want to avoid rejections.
0 coins
Rita Jacobs
•Thanks for sharing your experience. Sounds like it's really helpful for catching those small details.
0 coins
Reina Salazar
•I'm always looking for tools that can prevent filing errors. Might give this a try on my next UCC1 form.
0 coins
Rita Jacobs
Update: Thanks everyone for the advice! I ended up using the exact legal entity name 'Pacific Coast Dining Solutions, LLC' as the primary debtor and added 'Oceanview Bistro & Grill' in the additional debtor name field. The California UCC1 form was accepted without any issues. Really appreciate the community help on this one.
0 coins
Khalid Howes
•Glad it worked out! That's exactly the approach I would have recommended.
0 coins
Rosie Harper
•Perfect outcome. Always feels good when a filing goes through cleanly on the first try.
0 coins