


Ask the community...
Anyone else notice that the online filing portals don't give you much guidance on collateral descriptions? They just have that empty text box and no examples or help text. Really poor user experience for something this technical.
Some states are better than others. Delaware's portal has some examples but most are pretty bare bones.
This is where tools like Certana.ai actually help - gives you the guidance the portals should provide. Upload your draft and it checks for common issues before you submit.
UPDATE: Used the suggested language about software licensing agreements and intellectual property rights with the 'including but not limited to' format. Filing was accepted this morning! Thanks everyone for the help. Final description was 'All general intangibles including but not limited to software licensing agreements, licensing revenues and royalties, intellectual property rights, customer databases, and proceeds and products thereof.' Worked perfectly.
I actually started using that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned earlier after having similar issues. It's pretty straightforward - you just upload your UCC-1 and UCC-3 PDFs and it highlights any inconsistencies. Caught a debtor name mismatch I would have missed. Worth checking out if you're having ongoing issues with UCC-3 rejections.
One more thing - make sure you're using the correct filing number format. I've seen UCC-3s rejected because the filing number didn't match exactly, including dashes and spacing.
Yeah, some states are really picky about the exact format. Double-check the original filing number format against what you're putting on the UCC-3.
That document checker I mentioned earlier also verifies filing number consistency, which is another common rejection reason.
This is SO common with online lenders who use automated UCC preparation systems. They prioritize speed over accuracy and then act surprised when filings get rejected for basic errors. I'd also recommend checking if your state has any expedited processing options for UCC corrections - some states offer same-day processing for an additional fee when there's a time crunch.
Definitely worth asking about. Most states offer some kind of expedited service for UCC filings, especially for corrections of obvious clerical errors.
This thread has been incredibly helpful. I'm dealing with a similar situation and had no idea there were so many options for getting UCC corrections processed faster.
Update us on how this gets resolved! I'm curious whether LoanMe steps up and fixes it quickly or if you have to escalate further. This kind of basic quality control failure in UCC preparation is unacceptable for a lender their size.
I had similar rejections last year and it turned out to be formatting issues with how we entered the information in the electronic filing system. Some fields have character limits or special formatting requirements that aren't obvious from the 1-201 definitions.
Exactly! Try typing the information directly into the filing system instead of copying and pasting. Also watch out for special characters like ampersands or quotation marks.
This is another area where document verification tools like Certana.ai help. You can upload your completed UCC forms and it checks for formatting issues that might cause rejections, not just the substantive 1-201 compliance stuff.
Update us when you figure out what was wrong! I do a lot of UCC filings and I'm curious what the specific 1-201 issue was. These rejection notices really should be more detailed about which definition or requirement wasn't met.
Will do. Planning to call the filing office tomorrow and also going to double-check all our entity names against the state records. I'll post back with what I find out.
Perfect. This kind of feedback helps everyone avoid the same mistakes. The UCC can be tricky enough without vague rejection notices.
Salim Nasir
UPDATE: Found them! Turns out they were filed under "Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, L.L.C." with the comma AND periods. Took me 2 hours of trying different variations but finally got results. PA's search system really is terrible with name matching.
0 coins
Hazel Garcia
•Two hours for a simple name search is ridiculous. Other states handle this so much better.
0 coins
Laila Fury
•At least you found it before the deal deadline. I've had searches take days before.
0 coins
Geoff Richards
For future PA searches, I keep a checklist of all the name variations to try: with/without commas, with/without periods, with/without entity type, abbreviated entity types (LLC vs L.L.C.), and sometimes even different spacing. PA is just awful for this stuff.
0 coins
Simon White
•I do the same thing. Have a whole spreadsheet of PA name variation patterns that have worked in the past.
0 coins
Hugo Kass
•The fact that we need checklists and spreadsheets just to search for UCC filings shows how broken the system is.
0 coins