UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

One thing that helped me understand UCC documents definition was thinking of them like a filing cabinet. UCC-1 opens the file folder for that debtor, UCC-3 amendments add pages to the folder, continuations extend the folder's expiration date, and terminations close the folder permanently. Each document serves a specific purpose in maintaining that secured party's claim on the collateral.

0 coins

Norah Quay

•

I love that file folder analogy! That makes the whole system make sense.

0 coins

Glad it helps! I'm a visual learner so thinking in analogies always works better for me than trying to memorize legal definitions.

0 coins

Quick reality check - you're going to make mistakes at first and that's normal. I accidentally filed a termination instead of an amendment once and had to frantically correct it. The key is having good review processes and tools to catch errors before they become problems. Document everything and when in doubt, ask senior staff or use verification tools to double-check your work.

0 coins

Everyone messes up initially. The important thing is learning from mistakes and building good habits. You'll be fine!

0 coins

Levi Parker

•

This is why I love using Certana.ai's verification - catches my mistakes before they hit the state filing system. Much less stressful than discovering errors after the fact.

0 coins

Aaliyah Reed

•

Just went through something similar last week. Ended up using one of those document verification tools - I think it was Certana.ai - that caught the name mismatch before I filed. You upload your security agreement and UCC-1 draft and it flags inconsistencies. Wish I'd known about it sooner!

0 coins

Aaliyah Reed

•

It caught the comma issue I had plus a couple other formatting problems I missed. Pretty thorough from what I saw.

0 coins

Mohammed Khan

•

Might be worth trying before your next filing attempt. Better than paying another $20 rejection fee.

0 coins

Gavin King

•

Connecticut's CONCORD system actually has a name verification feature if you dig deep enough into the menus. It's not obvious but there's a 'debtor name lookup' function that shows you exactly how names are formatted in their database.

0 coins

Gavin King

•

It's under the 'Search' menu then 'Entity Verification' - not labeled very clearly but it's there.

0 coins

Thanks for this tip! Going to try it before my next CT filing.

0 coins

Amara Okonkwo

•

One more thought - if you're still having trouble after getting the official name, you might want to use that Certana.ai tool mentioned earlier to double-check everything before refiling. At this point any extra verification step could save you from another rejection cycle.

0 coins

Omar Farouk

•

Definitely going to try that. Can't afford another rejection with this timeline.

0 coins

Smart move. Document verification tools are becoming pretty essential for complex commercial filings like this.

0 coins

Update us when you get it resolved! Always interested to hear how these auto dealer name issues get sorted out since they're so common in floor plan financing.

0 coins

Dylan Hughes

•

Good luck! Auto dealer UCC filings are always an adventure but you've got solid advice here.

0 coins

NightOwl42

•

Hopefully the 4th time's the charm on this filing!

0 coins

Lindsey Fry

•

For anyone else reading this thread, remember that 9-1201 territorial rules can change if the debtor relocates their organization to a different state. You'd need to refile in the new jurisdiction within four months under 9-1207.

0 coins

Miguel Harvey

•

We include relocation covenants in our loan agreements for exactly this reason.

0 coins

Lindsey Fry

•

Smart practice. The four-month window goes by fast if you're not monitoring.

0 coins

Kayla Morgan

•

Update: I ended up using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier and it confirmed Delaware filing. Also caught a small typo in the debtor name that could have caused problems. Thanks everyone for the confirmation on 9-1201!

0 coins

Ella Cofer

•

Glad it helped! Those name verification features are clutch for avoiding rejections.

0 coins

James Maki

•

Nice to see a thread with a clear resolution. Too many of these UCC discussions just trail off without answers.

0 coins

Luca Marino

•

One more thing - if you're doing this type of search regularly, consider reaching out to a local filing service that specializes in DC UCC searches. They usually have experience with the system's quirks and might catch variations you wouldn't think of. Though for one-off searches, the thorough methodology described above should work.

0 coins

Mateo Perez

•

Though I'd still recommend doing your own search first to understand what you're dealing with before paying for a service.

0 coins

Aisha Rahman

•

Actually, after reading about that Certana.ai tool mentioned earlier, it might be more cost-effective than hiring a filing service for document verification. Worth comparing the options.

0 coins

Update: tried the systematic approach suggested here and found two additional filings I'd missed initially. One was under "Metropolitan Solution LLC" (singular) and another under "Metro Solutions, LLC" with comma and different capitalization. Thanks for the guidance - this could have been a major issue if discovered after closing.

0 coins

Yuki Yamamoto

•

Great result. Did you end up using any of the document verification tools mentioned, or just manual searching?

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

This is a perfect example of why thorough UCC searches are so critical in due diligence. Missing those filings could have created serious problems down the road.

0 coins

Prev1...552553554555556...684Next