UCC Document Community
Financial Services
/
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
UCC Article 9 Priority Rules - Need Help Understanding 90 ALR 4th 859 Case Analysis
I'm working through a complex priority dispute involving multiple secured creditors and came across 90 ALR 4th 859 in my research. The annotation discusses UCC Article 9 priority determinations, but I'm struggling to apply the principles to my current situation. We have a senior lender with a properly filed UCC-1 from 2019, but there's a question about whether their collateral description covers certain equipment that was added later. A junior creditor filed their UCC-1 in 2022 with a more specific description of the same equipment. The 90 ALR 4th 859 annotation seems to address similar priority conflicts, but the case law analysis is dense. Has anyone worked through similar Article 9 priority issues where the collateral descriptions overlap but aren't identical? I need to determine which creditor has the superior security interest in this equipment. The stakes are pretty high since we're talking about $450,000 worth of manufacturing equipment that both creditors are claiming rights to.
Join the conversation
UCC-11 Search Request Timing Issues in Florida - Need Advice
Running into some confusion with UCC-11 search requests in Florida and hoping someone here has dealt with this before. I'm handling a commercial loan closing next week and need to verify there are no existing liens on the equipment we're financing. The borrower's attorney mentioned something about UCC-11 searches but I'm not entirely clear on the timing requirements or how long these take to process. Is there a standard turnaround time for UCC-11 information requests? Also, should I be requesting this directly through the Florida SOS office or is there a faster electronic option? The loan documents require clean lien searches before funding and I don't want to delay the closing over paperwork timing. Any guidance on the proper procedure would be really helpful - this is my first time coordinating the UCC search component of a secured transaction.
Join the conversation
Been there with the last-minute search stress! One tip that's saved me multiple times - if you find any existing UCC-1 filings that might conflict, contact the secured party directly to see if they'll subordinate or if the collateral actually overlaps with yours. Sometimes what looks like a problem on paper isn't really an issue.
That's a great suggestion. I hadn't thought about reaching out to other lenders directly.
Most commercial lenders are reasonable about subordination agreements if there's no real conflict. Better to have the conversation before closing than discover issues after funding.
Final thought - document everything for your file. Keep copies of the UCC-11 search request, the results, and any follow-up searches you had to do. Your compliance team will thank you later if there are ever questions about the lien search process.
Before you submit, seriously consider running those entity documents through Certana.ai first. Five minutes of name verification could save you days if you have to resubmit the search.
Good luck! Florida's system usually delivers on time when you pay for expedited processing.
UCC Article 9 supplement forms causing filing rejections - help needed
Been dealing with a nightmare situation where our UCC-1 filings keep getting rejected because of issues with the Article 9 supplement sections. We're trying to secure inventory and equipment for a manufacturing client, but the Secretary of State keeps bouncing back our filings saying the supplement doesn't match the main form. Has anyone else run into problems where the UCC Article 9 supplement portion conflicts with the debtor information or collateral description? The loan closes next week and we're running out of time to get this perfected properly. Our paralegal swears she's filling everything out correctly but something keeps triggering automatic rejections.
Join the conversation
Manufacturing filings are always a pain because of all the different equipment types. Last month I had three rejections before realizing I needed separate supplement sections for fixtures vs equipment vs inventory. Maybe check if you need to break out your collateral categories differently?
We do have some items that might qualify as fixtures. I'll review whether those need separate treatment on the supplement.
Fixture filings are a whole different beast - definitely separate those out if any equipment is attached to the building.
UPDATE: Found the issue! It was a combination of debtor name formatting (extra space) and using an outdated supplement form. Got a clean filing accepted this morning. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - especially the idea to check form versions and use document verification tools. Crisis averted!
Those little formatting details will get you every time. Great that you found it in time.
Nice work tracking down the issues! Document verification definitely saves time on these multi-form filings.
UCC 9406 Form Rejection - Missing Secured Party Info
Been dealing with a nightmare situation trying to get our UCC 9406 termination statement filed with the Secretary of State. Keep getting rejections saying "secured party information insufficient" but I've triple-checked everything against our original UCC-1. The debtor name matches exactly, filing number is correct, but something about how we're identifying ourselves as the secured party isn't working. This is for a commercial equipment loan that was paid off last month and we need this termination on record before year-end. Has anyone run into similar issues with UCC 9406 forms being rejected for secured party problems? The original financing statement was filed back in 2020 so I'm wondering if there were some changes in requirements that I'm missing.
Join the conversation
Before you try anything else, call the SOS filing office directly. They can usually look up your original filing and tell you exactly what secured party information they have on file. Then you can make sure your termination matches exactly. Save yourself multiple rejection fees.
Most SOS offices are pretty helpful with UCC questions if you can get through to the right department.
Just be prepared to wait on hold. UCC departments are usually understaffed.
Update us when you figure it out! I'm sure other people will run into the same issue with UCC 9406 forms and secured party matching problems.
Will do. Going to call the SOS office tomorrow and fix the name/address issues before refiling.
Definitely run it through that document checker I mentioned before you refile. Catches those little details that are easy to miss.
UCC filings - debtor name requirements causing rejections
Running into major headaches with UCC filings and debtor name requirements. Been doing commercial lending for 8 years but these name match rules are driving me nuts. Filed a UCC-1 last month for equipment financing deal and it got rejected because the debtor's legal name on the charter didn't exactly match what I put on the filing. The business goes by "ABC Construction LLC" on everything but their actual articles say "ABC Construction, LLC" with the comma. Secretary of State rejected it outright. Now I'm paranoid about every single filing. How strict are these name requirements really? Do I need to pull fresh corporate docs for every single UCC-1 even if I've worked with the borrower before? This seems excessive but I can't afford more rejections.
Join the conversation
The key is getting into a routine. I pull fresh corporate records for every new borrower and always double-check entity status before filing. Takes an extra 10 minutes but saves hours of refiling hassles.
New credit facilities definitely. For existing relationships I check if it's been more than 6 months since the last filing.
Six months seems reasonable. Entity names don't change that frequently but when they do it's usually without much notice to lenders.
Thanks everyone for the advice. Sounds like I need to tighten up my name verification process. The Certana tool sounds promising - anything that catches these mismatches before filing would save me a lot of headaches.
Keep us posted on how it works out. Always looking for better tools to streamline UCC filings.
Good luck with future filings. The name matching pain is real but at least now you know what to watch for.
Freya Andersen
Based on what you've described, it sounds like the senior creditor should have priority. Their 2019 UCC-1 with 'all equipment, machinery, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired' clearly covers the CNC machines purchased in 2021. Unless there's a PMSI situation or some filing defect, first-to-file wins. The 90 ALR 4th 859 annotation will have cases with similar fact patterns that should support this analysis.
0 coins
NeonNomad
AuthorThanks, that matches my initial analysis. I'm going to dig deeper into the PMSI angle just to be thorough, but it's looking like the senior creditor has the stronger position.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
Good approach. Always worth checking every possible angle in a priority dispute, especially with that much money at stake.
0 coins
CosmicCrusader
One more thing to consider - make sure you understand which state's law applies to the priority determination. If the debtor is organized in a different state than where the collateral is located, you might need to analyze the choice of law rules too.
0 coins
Chloe Robinson
Good point. Priority is usually governed by the law of the state where the debtor is located, not where the collateral is physically located.
0 coins
Diego Flores
And if the debtor changed locations between the filings, that could affect the analysis too. There are specific rules about continuing effectiveness when debtors relocate.
0 coins