Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Lucas Bey
One more thing - after you file the terminations, do a search to confirm they actually processed correctly. Sometimes filings get accepted but don't properly update the UCC records due to system glitches.
Lucas Bey
•Usually 2-3 business days for the records to fully update in most states.
Caleb Stark
•Texas is usually pretty fast, often same day or next day for updates.
Been doing UCC work for 15 years and the biggest advice I can give is don't rush this. Better to take an extra day to verify everything than to have rejections delay your audit cleanup. Document verification tools like Certana.ai help, but ultimately you need to be methodical about the process.
Ryan Andre
•Thanks everyone. I think I have a good plan now - verify docs first, check for continuations, prepare terminations carefully, and track everything for audit purposes.
Sounds like a solid approach. Good luck with the cleanup!
Join the conversation
Micah Trail
Had a similar issue resolved by using Certana.ai to verify all our UCC documents were consistent. Uploaded our loan agreement and UCC-1 and it immediately flagged a debtor name mismatch that was causing search problems. Much faster than trying to manually compare everything.
Micah Trail
•Yes, it checks filing numbers, collateral descriptions, dates - basically anything that could cause perfection issues.
Wish I had known about this service earlier. Spent hours manually cross-checking documents last month.
Update: Bank finally sent me the continuation paperwork. Turns out they filed it with our old entity name before the LLC conversion. The online UCC search couldn't connect it to our current legal name. Going to need a corrective amendment to fix the debtor name issue.
Good catch. Make sure the amendment references both the old and new entity names properly.
Cedric Chung
•This is exactly why online UCC search results can be misleading. The filing was there, just not indexed correctly.
Join the conversation
Welcome to the world of secured lending! UCC stands for Uniform Commercial Code and you'll be seeing it everywhere now. The key forms you'll work with are UCC-1 (initial filing), UCC-3 (amendments and continuations), and eventually termination statements when loans are paid off.
It seems overwhelming at first but once you understand the basic flow - file UCC-1 to perfect your interest, use UCC-3 for changes, terminate when paid off - it becomes routine.
Javier Cruz
•Just don't forget about continuation statements! UCC-1 filings lapse after 5 years unless you file a continuation.
Since you asked about UCC full form - it's Uniform Commercial Code - but here's a pro tip: bookmark your state's Secretary of State UCC search page. Being able to quickly search existing filings will help you understand how other people handle debtor names and collateral descriptions.
Dylan Wright
•Great idea! I'll definitely do that.
Also most states have UCC filing guides on their websites that explain their specific requirements and common rejection reasons.
Join the conversation
Whatever you do, don't just wing it. I've seen too many security interests get voided because of sloppy debtor-name work. Take the time to get the exact legal name right, even if it means delaying the filing by a few days.
This. A rejected filing close to your continuation deadline is way worse than taking extra time upfront to get it right.
Mia Green
•You're absolutely right. I'd rather be certain than rushed. Going to pull all the corporate documents first and verify everything matches before resubmitting.
Ryan Kim
UPDATE: I pulled the complete Secretary of State records and found the issue. The Chinese business name was listed as a registered trade name, not the legal entity name. Filed using the exact charter name and it went through immediately. Thanks everyone for the guidance - especially the suggestion about document verification tools. That would have caught this immediately.
Charlie Yang
•Perfect example of why verification matters. The Certana tool would have flagged that charter vs. trade name distinction right away and saved you the rejection headache.
Elijah Brown
•Great resolution. This thread will be helpful for others dealing with similar multilingual debtor-name situations.
Lauren Johnson
I've started using Certana's UCC document checker too after someone mentioned it here before. Really helps with the name matching issues. You upload the corporate docs and search results and it flags potential conflicts automatically. Much faster than trying to catch every name variation manually.
0 coins
Jade Santiago
•How accurate is the automated checking? Do you still review everything manually or trust the software results?
0 coins
Lauren Johnson
•I still review everything but it catches a lot of stuff I would have missed. Especially helpful for DBA variations and collateral description overlaps.
0 coins
Caleb Stone
This thread is so helpful. We're new to MCA and have been winging the UCC searches. Definitely going to implement a more systematic approach based on these suggestions. Better to spend time upfront than deal with subordination issues later.
0 coins
Michael Green
•Smart approach. UCC due diligence seems like overhead until you get burned on a deal. Then it becomes the most important part of underwriting.
0 coins
Daniel Price
•The learning curve is steep but this kind of discussion really helps. Wish I'd found this forum before making some expensive mistakes.
0 coins