Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just to follow up on the amendment strategy - make sure you're filing in all the right states since you mentioned TX, FL, CA. Each state might have slightly different requirements for amendment procedures, though the UCC itself is pretty standardized.
CA sometimes has quirky procedural stuff, so definitely worth checking their SOS website for any special requirements.
Sofia Price
•FL is usually straightforward for amendments. TX too. Just make sure you're using current forms.
Bottom line - file those UCC-3 amendments ASAP with detailed equipment descriptions matching your security agreements. Don't wait around hoping generic descriptions will hold up if challenged. Better to over-describe than under-describe with equipment collateral.
Smart move. And consider implementing better description standards going forward to avoid this issue on future filings.
Lara Woods
•Definitely recommend setting up some kind of automated document checking process so you catch these issues at filing time instead of months later.
Join the conversation
One thing to consider - when you file the corrective amendment, make sure you're clear in the amendment description that you're correcting the debtor name from the original filing. This creates a clear paper trail.
Yes, something like 'Correcting debtor name from Johnson Manufacturing LLC to Johnson Manufacturing, LLC' makes it crystal clear.
This is another area where Certana.ai helps - it generates suggested amendment language based on the discrepancies it finds between your documents.
Update us after you file the correction! Always curious to see how these situations resolve.
Will do. Planning to file the corrective UCC-3 tomorrow morning. Thanks everyone for the advice - this community is incredibly helpful.
Glad we could help! These name consistency issues are more common than people realize.
Join the conversation
Had a client recently who thought they missed a continuation deadline but it turned out their attorney had actually filed it properly and just never sent confirmation. Sometimes the issue is communication rather than actual missed deadlines. Definitely verify the filing status before assuming the worst case scenario.
Exactly. Pull the records from the SOS website or use their search function to see what's actually on file. You might be pleasantly surprised.
Oliver Cheng
•This is why I always send clients copies of filed documents with confirmation. Too much at stake to leave them guessing about whether filings were completed.
Update us when you find out the real status! I'm invested in this story now and hoping it turns out better than expected. These UCC deadline horror stories always make me double-check my own filings.
Will definitely update once I get to the bottom of this. Hopefully it's not as bad as I initially thought.
Same here - following for the update. This thread has been educational but also terrifying!
Join the conversation
Just had a thought - is the debtor entity still active and in good standing with Massachusetts? If the LLC was dissolved or suspended, that might cause issues with the continuation filing even if the debtor name is correct.
Aisha Ali
•You can check this on the Massachusetts Secretary of State website. If the entity is suspended or dissolved, you might need to get that resolved before the UCC continuation will be accepted.
Ethan Moore
•This is another thing that document verification tools can catch automatically - they can cross-reference the debtor entity status with the corporate database to flag any issues before you try to file.
UPDATE: I figured it out! It was actually a character encoding issue with the original filing. The debtor name had a special character that displayed normally but was encoded differently in the state's database. I ended up using one of those document checking tools mentioned earlier (Certana.ai) and it immediately flagged the encoding discrepancy. Once I adjusted the debtor name to match the exact encoding from the original filing, the continuation went through without any problems. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!
Emma Wilson
•Glad the document verification tool helped! These kinds of technical issues are exactly why I started using automated checking for all my UCC work.
StarSurfer
•This thread is going to be so helpful for anyone else dealing with Massachusetts UCC continuation rejections. I'm bookmarking it for future reference.
Julian Paolo
Whatever you do, don't wait too long to sort this out. If your UCC-1 lapses while you're dealing with amendment issues, you lose your priority date and have to start over. Ask me how I know.
0 coins
Julian Paolo
•Let's just say I learned the importance of continuation filings the hard way. Now I set calendar reminders years in advance.
0 coins
Ella Knight
•This is why I always recommend filing continuations early even if you're dealing with amendments. Better safe than sorry with your lien priority.
0 coins
William Schwarz
Update us when you get it sorted out. Always curious to hear how these CA UCC statement service nightmares get resolved. Helps the rest of us avoid similar problems.
0 coins
Cameron Black
•Will do. Hoping to get this figured out this week. Really appreciate all the advice here.
0 coins
Alexander Evans
•Seriously consider the document verification approach. Even if you get this current issue fixed, it'll help prevent future problems with your CA UCC statement service filings.
0 coins