UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Hazel Garcia

UCC 1-308 Code Questions - Rights Reserved vs Filing Requirements

I'm getting confused about UCC 1-308 code and how it relates to actual UCC filings. My business partner keeps mentioning "UCC 1-308 rights reserved" on contracts but I can't find this anywhere in our state's UCC filing system. We're doing equipment financing and I need to file proper UCC-1 statements but I'm worried we're missing something important. Are we supposed to reference 1-308 somewhere in our UCC filings? The SOS website doesn't mention anything about this code and I don't want to mess up our perfected security interests. Has anyone dealt with UCC 1-308 code requirements in their filings?

Joshua Hellan

•

I ran into this same UCC 1-308 code confusion when I started doing my own filings. Turns out it's not needed for UCC-1 forms at all. Just make sure your debtor name matches their charter exactly and your collateral description covers what you're financing.

0 coins

Joshua Hellan

•

I use Certana.ai now - upload both the charter and UCC-1 as PDFs and it automatically flags any name mismatches. Way easier than trying to compare documents manually.

0 coins

That sounds like a lifesaver. Manual document comparison is such a pain and so easy to miss small differences.

0 coins

Bottom line: UCC 1-308 code is irrelevant to your equipment financing UCC-1 filings. Focus on Article 9 requirements - correct debtor name, proper collateral description, right filing state. That's what actually perfects your security interest.

0 coins

James Johnson

•

Perfect summary. All this 1-308 stuff is just a distraction from the real filing requirements.

0 coins

Agreed. Keep it simple and follow the established UCC Article 9 procedures. Everything else is just noise.

0 coins

Scarlett Forster

UCC lien search Ohio - multiple filings under different debtor name variations

Running into a wall with UCC lien search Ohio requirements for a equipment refinance deal. The borrower operates under 3 different entity names and I'm finding UCC-1 filings scattered across all variations when I search the Ohio SOS database. Some show as 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' others as 'ABC Mfg LLC' and one continuation shows 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' with the comma. The original lender says they filed everything correctly but I'm seeing gaps in the lien chain that could affect our position. Has anyone dealt with debtor name inconsistencies in Ohio UCC searches? Need to verify if we're looking at the same collateral or if there are multiple security interests that weren't properly continued. This is holding up a $180K equipment loan and the borrower is getting frustrated with the delays.

PaulineW

•

Have you contacted the original lender directly? They should be able to provide a complete list of their UCC filings for this borrower. Might save you from trying to piece together the search results. Sometimes lenders file under parent company names or guarantor names that don't show up in obvious searches.

0 coins

PaulineW

•

Typical. They don't want to admit if they made filing errors. You'll probably have to piece it together yourself.

0 coins

I'd get that in writing from them - if they're claiming proper filing but you find name mismatches, that could be important for lien priority disputes later.

0 coins

Chris Elmeda

•

This thread is making me paranoid about our UCC filing procedures. We always use the exact legal entity name from incorporation documents, but now I'm wondering if we should be checking for DBA variations too. How do most lenders handle debtor name verification before filing?

0 coins

Jean Claude

•

We run the borrower's name through Certana.ai before filing to catch any inconsistencies with their corporate documents. Helps avoid these issues upfront.

0 coins

Derek Olson

•

The key is using ONE consistent name format across all UCC filings for that borrower. Pick the legal entity name and stick with it.

0 coins

Freya Thomsen

UCC continuation filing for 10 year security agreement - timing question

Hey everyone, need some guidance on continuation timing. We have a 10 year security agreement that was originally filed as a UCC-1 back in 2020. The original financing statement is coming up on its 5-year mark and I'm getting conflicting advice about when exactly to file the UCC-3 continuation. Some people are telling me I need to file it within 6 months before the 5-year expiration, others say I can wait until closer to the actual date. The security agreement itself runs for 10 years but obviously the UCC-1 only lasts 5 years unless continued. This is for equipment financing on some manufacturing equipment and I really can't afford to let this lapse. Anyone dealt with this timing issue before? What's the safest approach here?

Ethan Wilson

•

The 6-month window is there for a reason - use it. File early, verify everything is correct, and then you can relax knowing your security interest stays perfected.

0 coins

Freya Thomsen

•

That's the plan. Going to get this filed next week and be done with it.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

Smart approach. Better to file early and have peace of mind than stress about deadlines.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

Just remember that if you miss the continuation deadline, your security interest becomes unperfected and you lose your priority position. With equipment financing, that's not a risk worth taking.

0 coins

Freya Thomsen

•

Yeah, that's why I'm being so careful about this. The equipment is worth too much to risk losing the security interest.

0 coins

Diego Rojas

•

Plus if you let it lapse, you'd have to file a whole new UCC-1 and lose your original priority date.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

UCC filing complications with trade finance security agreement - debtor entity mismatch

Running into a nightmare scenario with our trade finance security agreement UCC filing. We have a $2.8M revolving credit facility secured by inventory and receivables, but the debtor entity name on our security agreement shows "Global Import Solutions LLC" while their articles of incorporation actually show "Global Import Solutions, LLC" (with the comma). Filed our UCC-1 three weeks ago matching the security agreement exactly, and it got rejected by the SOS office for "debtor name discrepancy." Now I'm second-guessing everything - should I refile matching the exact corporate charter name, or amend the security agreement first? The borrower is getting antsy about their inventory financing timeline, and I'm worried about the gap in perfection. Has anyone dealt with punctuation issues in trade finance security agreements before? This seems like such a minor detail but apparently it's enough to void our filing.

Zainab Ismail

•

Quick question - when you refile, are you going to use the same filing number or get a new one? I always worry about creating duplicate entries in the system when refiling after a rejection.

0 coins

Right, the rejected filing essentially doesn't exist in the system, so the new filing will be treated as an original UCC-1.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

That's actually really helpful to know. I was wondering about the same thing for a filing I need to correct next week.

0 coins

Update us when you get it resolved! Always curious to hear how these trade finance UCC issues work out, especially with the tight timelines you're dealing with.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

Will do! Planning to refile tomorrow morning with the correct charter name. Hopefully that resolves it quickly.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

Good luck! Trade finance deals are stressful enough without UCC filing complications adding to the mix.

0 coins

AstroAdventurer

UCC 1-309 Notice Requirements - Am I Missing Something Critical?

I'm dealing with a UCC 1-309 notice situation and frankly I'm second-guessing everything. We had a debtor default on equipment financing last month and I need to make sure I'm following proper notice procedures before proceeding with any collection actions. The loan documents reference UCC 1-309 notification requirements but I'm seeing conflicting information about timing and content requirements. Has anyone dealt with UCC 1-309 notices recently? I'm particularly concerned about whether email notification is sufficient or if certified mail is required. The debtor is a small manufacturing company and the collateral includes some specialized machinery that's probably depreciated significantly. I don't want to mess up the notice procedure and jeopardize our secured position. Any guidance on UCC 1-309 compliance would be hugely appreciated.

Carmen Lopez

•

I've been through this process three times now and each time I discover something new I should have done differently. The UCC 1-309 requirements seem straightforward but there are so many little details that can trip you up. At least this thread is helping me feel like I'm not the only one struggling with this stuff.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

You're definitely not alone! The UCC is complex and every situation has its own quirks. That's why verification tools and forums like this are so valuable.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

Same here - I thought I understood UCC compliance until I actually had to execute it. There's a big difference between reading the rules and applying them correctly.

0 coins

One thing I learned the hard way - keep detailed records of everything related to your UCC 1-309 notice. Date sent, method of delivery, debtor responses, everything. If you end up in court, you'll need to prove you followed proper procedures.

0 coins

Jamal Wilson

•

Exactly. I create a timeline with every action and keep copies of everything. Courts love seeing organized compliance documentation.

0 coins

Mei Lin

•

And don't forget to document the condition of the collateral when you take possession. Photos, appraisals, maintenance records - everything that supports your disposition decisions.

0 coins

Prev1...404405406407408...684Next