UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Emma Davis

UCC-1 Filing Rejected in Colorado - Debtor Name Format Issues

Just had my UCC-1 filing rejected by Colorado SOS for the third time and I'm losing my mind. The rejection notice keeps saying 'debtor name does not match exactly' but I've triple-checked everything against the LLC formation docs. Filing on a $180K equipment loan and the lender is breathing down my neck about getting this perfected ASAP. The debtor is 'Mountain View Equipment Solutions, LLC' on their Articles but I noticed their bank account shows 'Mountain View Equipment Solutions LLC' (no comma). Colorado's portal won't accept either version - keeps bouncing back with cryptic error messages. Has anyone dealt with Colorado's pickiness about exact name formatting? This is holding up the entire deal and I'm running out of time before the purchase money security interest window closes.

Update us when you get it sorted! These Colorado filing horror stories help everyone learn what to watch out for.

0 coins

Emma Davis

•

Will definitely post an update. This thread has been incredibly helpful already.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

Pro tip: when you do get the correct name format, save it in a master file with all your Colorado entity names. Saves time on future filings and prevents these repeated issues.

0 coins

Freya Thomsen

•

Smart approach. I keep a spreadsheet with exact name formats for every entity I file against. Colorado, Delaware, and Texas are the pickiest in my experience.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

California is pretty bad too but at least their error messages are more specific about what's wrong.

0 coins

Emma Bianchi

UCC filing example - need help with debtor name formatting on UCC-1

I'm working on my first UCC-1 filing and could really use a solid example to follow. The debtor is a partnership called "Johnson & Associates Construction, LP" but I'm not sure how to format the name properly in the system. Should I include the comma before LP? What about the ampersand vs spelling out "and"? I've seen different examples online and don't want to mess this up since it's securing a $150K equipment loan. The collateral is excavation equipment and I want to make sure I get the debtor name exactly right to avoid rejection. Anyone have experience with partnership name formatting on UCC filings?

Ryan Kim

•

Make sure you also double-check the state where you're filing. Some states are stricter about name formatting than others. Also verify the partnership is still in good standing before filing - I've had issues where the entity was dissolved but we didn't know.

0 coins

Zoe Walker

•

How do you check if a partnership is in good standing? Is that on the Secretary of State website too?

0 coins

Ryan Kim

•

Yes, most state SOS websites have entity search tools that show current status. Look for "active" or "good standing" status.

0 coins

Elijah Brown

•

One more tip - take a screenshot of the entity information from the state database when you look it up. That way you have proof of how the name was formatted on the official records when you filed, just in case there are questions later.

0 coins

Emma Bianchi

•

That's brilliant! I never would have thought to document that but it makes total sense for audit purposes.

0 coins

I do this too. Also helps if you need to file amendments or continuations later - you have the exact formatting saved.

0 coins

Paolo Marino

What is a security interest agreement and how does it relate to UCC filings?

I'm trying to understand the relationship between security interest agreements and UCC filings. My company is getting a $450K equipment loan and the lender keeps mentioning both documents. I know we need to file a UCC-1, but they also want us to sign something called a security interest agreement. Are these the same thing? Do I need both? The equipment includes manufacturing machinery and some vehicles. I'm confused about which document actually creates the lien and which one just records it publicly. Any help would be appreciated - I don't want to mess up a filing this big.

Sean Flanagan

•

One more thing - make sure whoever prepares your UCC-1 has access to the final security agreement. I've seen cases where the UCC preparer was working from an old draft and the collateral descriptions didn't match the final agreement terms. Another good reason to use something like Certana.ai to verify document consistency before filing.

0 coins

Sean Flanagan

•

Usually the lender handles it, but you should review and approve before filing. It's your name going on public record.

0 coins

Zara Mirza

•

I always insist on reviewing the UCC-1 draft. Found mistakes in about 30% of them over the years.

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

Just to summarize for the OP: Security agreement = private contract creating the lien. UCC-1 = public filing perfecting the lien. You need both. Agreement comes first, filing should follow quickly. Both documents should have matching debtor names and consistent collateral descriptions. Don't sign anything you don't understand, and verify the UCC-1 gets filed correctly.

0 coins

Luca Russo

•

Good advice. I'd add that you should keep copies of everything and calendar the UCC-1 continuation deadline if it's a long-term loan.

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

Great point about continuation filings. UCC-1 expires after 5 years unless renewed with a UCC-3 continuation.

0 coins

Ryder Everingham

CT UCC search showing inconsistent results - debtor name variations causing issues

Running into a frustrating situation with Connecticut's UCC search system. I'm trying to verify existing filings for a commercial loan modification and the search results keep changing depending on how I enter the debtor name. Same company, but if I search 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' vs 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' (with the comma) I get different results. One search shows 3 active UCC-1 filings, the other shows 5. This is for a $2.8M equipment refinance and I need to make sure we're not missing any existing liens before we file our new UCC-1. Has anyone else dealt with Connecticut's system being this finicky about punctuation and spacing? I'm worried we might miss a critical filing that could affect our security position.

Niko Ramsey

•

For your $2.8M deal, I'd definitely recommend getting a professional UCC search done in addition to your own research. Yes it costs money, but missing a lien on a deal that size could be catastrophic. The pros have access to better search tools and know all the name variation tricks for each state. Sometimes the peace of mind is worth the extra cost.

0 coins

Niko Ramsey

•

I've had good luck with CT Corporation and National Corporate Research. Both are thorough and know the state-specific quirks.

0 coins

Professional searches are definitely worth it for high-dollar deals. They carry insurance too, which adds another layer of protection.

0 coins

Jabari-Jo

•

Update us when you figure out the complete search results! I'm dealing with a similar situation in CT and curious to see how many variations you end up having to try. The inconsistency in their system is maddening but knowing I'm not the only one dealing with it helps.

0 coins

Will do! Planning to try the Certana tool first, then maybe get a professional search as backup verification.

0 coins

Jabari-Jo

•

Smart approach. Better to be thorough upfront than deal with problems later.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

UCC1 template variations causing debtor name rejections - need standard format

I'm pulling my hair out over UCC1 template inconsistencies. We've had three filings rejected this month because of debtor name formatting issues, and I'm starting to think different templates are part of the problem. Our bank uses a standard UCC1 template but when I compare it to what other lenders are filing, there are subtle differences in how the debtor information fields are structured. Has anyone found a reliable UCC1 template that consistently passes SOS review? I'm particularly struggling with LLC name formatting - some templates have separate fields for entity type, others don't. Last week we had a filing rejected because we put 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' in one field instead of 'ABC Manufacturing' with 'LLC' in a separate designation field. The SOS portal doesn't give clear guidance on which UCC1 template format they prefer.

CosmicCruiser

•

I'm curious if anyone has compared different UCC1 template software. We're using a system that's probably 10 years old and I'm wondering if newer platforms handle the formatting issues better.

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

•

Which software did you switch to? We're shopping around for a new system.

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

I'd rather not name specific vendors here, but look for systems that offer real-time validation against SOS requirements. Also make sure they update their UCC1 templates regularly when filing offices change their formats.

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

Just want to add that inconsistent UCC1 templates are a bigger problem than most people realize. We did an audit last year and found that 60% of our filing delays were due to template formatting issues, not actual substantive problems with the filings.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

Pre-filing reviews are smart but time-consuming. Have you looked into automated verification tools? I've heard good things about services that can check UCC1 templates against filing requirements automatically.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

Yes, we actually started using Certana.ai for that exact purpose. Upload your UCC1 template and it checks for debtor name formatting issues, missing information, field mapping problems, etc. Saves a lot of manual review time.

0 coins

Prev1...405406407408409...684Next