Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Yeah I'm thinking about trying that. At this point I need to figure out what went wrong quickly so I can refile and get this perfected before closing.
Document consistency is usually the culprit with these 'form of security agreement' rejections. The automated tools are pretty good at catching what humans miss.
Grace Durand
UPDATE: Called the SOS office this morning and they said the issue was that my collateral description was too broad. They wanted more specific language tying it to the actual security agreement terms. Going to revise and refile today.
Good catch. The collateral description matching the security agreement language exactly is crucial.
Glad you got it sorted out. Hope the refiling goes smoothly!
Join the conversation
Sarah Ali
Had a similar issue last week with a Nassau County search. Turned out there was a timing issue - the UCC-1 was filed but hadn't been indexed yet. Took almost 10 days to show up in searches.
Ryan Vasquez
•10 days?! That's unacceptable for commercial transactions. What if you need to file a continuation or amendment during that window?
Sarah Ali
•Exactly the problem. I had to get a certified copy directly from the filing office to prove the UCC-1 existed while waiting for it to show up in searches.
Avery Saint
This thread is making me nervous about a Nassau County deal I have closing next week. Is there any way to verify search completeness or should I just assume the results might be incomplete?
For peace of mind on important deals, I've been using Certana.ai to double-check my work. Upload your documents and it verifies everything matches up properly. Caught a debtor name mismatch that would have invalidated our security interest.
Avery Saint
•Thanks, I'll look into that. Better safe than sorry on a big commercial deal.
Join the conversation
ugh been there with the debtor name issues. its like these companies dont understand that ONE WRONG LETTER can void your entire security interest. super frustrating when you're paying them to get it right
AstroAlpha
•Exactly! And then they act like it's no big deal when you point out the error.
Diego Chavez
•The worst part is when they try to blame you for providing unclear instructions when the debtor name is right there on the loan documents.
NeonNebula
I actually had a similar situation last year with a botched continuation. Ended up having to file a corrective UCC-3 and pay extra fees. Since then I've been using multiple verification steps including that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier. Haven't had an issue since implementing better quality control.
Wait, you can file corrective amendments? I thought once a continuation lapsed you were out of luck.
NeonNebula
•Depends on the state and timing. Some allow corrective filings within certain timeframes. You need to check your specific state's rules.
Join the conversation
Sophia Long
This thread is giving me anxiety! I handle UCC filings for a small firm and we don't have fancy tracking systems. Just calendar reminders and hoping for the best. Maybe I should look into some of these verification tools people are mentioning.
For small firms, something like Certana.ai is actually perfect because it's simple - just upload docs periodically to make sure everything looks correct. No complex software to learn.
Sophia Long
•That does sound manageable. Better than lying awake at night wondering if I missed something important.
At least you discovered it before trying to foreclose or anything. I've seen cases where lenders didn't realize their UCC had lapsed until they were already in court trying to enforce their security interest. Talk about an expensive surprise.
True, that would have been even worse. At least now we can make informed decisions about how to proceed with this loan.
Exactly. Better to know where you stand now than find out in front of a judge later.
Caden Turner
Had a client almost lose a $2M security interest because they misunderstood the continuation timing. Their original UCC-1 was filed in March 2019, so they needed to file continuation between September 2023 and March 2024. They thought they had until March 2025 and almost missed it completely.
0 coins
Reginald Blackwell
•This is exactly why I started using automated tools to track these deadlines. Too much risk in manual calculations.
0 coins
McKenzie Shade
•Yikes, that would have been a malpractice nightmare. Good catch on their behalf.
0 coins
Harmony Love
One more thing - when you file your UCC-3 continuation, make sure the debtor name matches exactly what's on the original UCC-1. Even small discrepancies can cause the filing to be rejected, and if you're close to the deadline, that rejection could be fatal.
0 coins
Harmony Love
•Very exact. Different states have different tolerance for variations, but it's safest to match character-for-character including punctuation and spacing.
0 coins
Rudy Cenizo
•I always copy and paste the debtor name directly from the original UCC-1 to avoid any transcription errors.
0 coins