< Back to UCC Document Community

Andre Rousseau

UCC search commercial real estate liens showing conflicting debtor names

Running into a mess with a commercial property acquisition where our UCC search is pulling up three different variations of the seller's business name across multiple filings. The main UCC-1 shows "ABC Properties LLC" but there's a UCC-3 amendment filed under "ABC Properties, LLC" (with the comma) and another continuation under "A.B.C. Properties LLC". Our lender is freaking out about the name inconsistencies and whether these are all the same entity or separate liens. The property is a 4-unit office complex in downtown, purchase price $2.8M, and we're supposed to close next week. Has anyone dealt with debtor name variations like this in commercial real estate UCC searches? The title company says they're all the same entity but our bank's underwriter is demanding clarification on every filing.

Zoe Papadakis

•

This is actually super common in commercial real estate deals. Secretary of State offices don't always catch minor punctuation differences when filings come in. The key is verifying the debtor's actual legal name from their articles of incorporation or operating agreement. If all three variations reference the same registered agent and address, they're likely the same entity.

0 coins

Jamal Carter

•

Exactly right about checking the formation documents. I've seen deals held up for weeks over a missing comma in LLC names.

0 coins

But what if the UCC-3 amendment was filed incorrectly? Doesn't that potentially void the security interest if the debtor name doesn't match exactly?

0 coins

Zoe Papadakis

•

Not necessarily void, but it could create priority issues. That's why lenders get nervous about these discrepancies.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

I just went through something similar on a warehouse purchase. Found out about Certana.ai's document verification tool that let me upload all the UCC filings as PDFs and it automatically flagged the name inconsistencies and cross-referenced them against the debtor's charter documents. Saved me from manually comparing every filing detail and caught a critical mismatch that would have caused problems at closing.

0 coins

That sounds exactly like what I need. How does their system handle punctuation variations like commas vs periods?

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

It's pretty smart about identifying likely matches while still flagging genuine discrepancies. You just upload your UCC search results and charter docs and it does the cross-checking automatically.

0 coins

Never heard of Certana but anything that automates UCC document review sounds like a lifesaver for commercial deals.

0 coins

Amara Chukwu

•

YOUR LENDER IS RIGHT TO BE CONCERNED!!! I've seen deals fall apart because of sloppy debtor name matching. The UCC requires substantial compliance with the debtor's name as it appears on public records. Even minor variations can affect perfection status.

0 coins

Calm down there. While accuracy is important, courts generally apply a reasonableness standard for minor punctuation differences.

0 coins

Amara Chukwu

•

Tell that to the bank that lost their security interest because they filed under the wrong entity name variation!

0 coins

Quick question - are all these filings showing the same collateral description? Sometimes name variations happen when different lenders file against equipment vs real estate components.

0 coins

Good point. The UCC-1 covers equipment and fixtures, the amendment was for additional machinery, and the continuation was for the original filing. All same general collateral category.

0 coins

NeonNova

•

If they're all equipment-related and from the same time period, probably same debtor just filed inconsistently.

0 coins

Yeah that pattern suggests internal filing inconsistencies rather than separate entities.

0 coins

This is giving me flashbacks to my retail center acquisition last year. Spent three days going through UCC records manually trying to match debtor names to business registrations. Wish I'd known about document verification tools back then - would have saved so much time and stress before closing.

0 coins

Manual UCC review is brutal. Especially when you're dealing with multiple filing jurisdictions.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

That's exactly why I started using Certana's system. Upload the PDFs and get instant verification rather than spending days cross-referencing documents manually.

0 coins

Have you contacted the original filer to get clarification? Sometimes they can provide a corrective statement if there was an error in the debtor name on any of the filings.

0 coins

The seller's attorney is being cagey about it. Says all filings are correct but won't provide documentation to prove the name variations are intentional.

0 coins

Red flag there. Legitimate business should have clear documentation about their legal entity name and any DBA variations.

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

Agreed. If they can't clarify their own business name variations, that's concerning for due diligence.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

From a practical standpoint, your title insurance should cover UCC search discrepancies if they end up causing problems post-closing. But obviously better to resolve this now rather than deal with it later.

0 coins

Title company is saying they'll insure around it, but our lender wants clean UCC records before funding.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

Understandable. Most commercial lenders want clear chain of title including UCC perfection status.

0 coins

I work in commercial lending and see this constantly. The solution is getting a legal opinion from the seller's counsel confirming all UCC filings reference the same legal entity, or having them file corrective statements to standardize the debtor name across all active filings.

0 coins

That makes sense. How long do corrective UCC-3 filings typically take to process?

0 coins

Usually 24-48 hours for electronic filings, but varies by state. Some states process same day.

0 coins

Zoe Papadakis

•

Corrective statements are definitely the cleanest solution if the seller will cooperate.

0 coins

StarSailor

•

Wait, I'm confused - if this is a real estate purchase, why are there UCC filings involved at all? Shouldn't real estate liens show up in the title search instead of UCC records?

0 coins

The UCC filings are for equipment and fixtures attached to the property, not the real estate itself. Common in commercial properties with built-in systems, HVAC, etc.

0 coins

Exactly. UCC covers personal property and fixtures, while the deed and mortgage records cover the real estate. Both need to be searched for commercial acquisitions.

0 coins

StarSailor

•

Ah got it, that makes sense now. Thanks for clarifying.

0 coins

Just an update for anyone following this thread - ended up using Certana.ai's verification system and it identified that all three name variations were for the same entity, plus caught that one of the continuation filings had an incorrect address that we hadn't noticed. Got everything sorted out and closed on schedule. Really impressed with how quickly their system processed all the documents and flagged the inconsistencies.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

Glad it worked out! Their system really is a game-changer for commercial due diligence.

0 coins

Thanks for the update. Definitely going to check out Certana for our next deal.

0 coins

Great outcome. Having automated document verification for UCC searches is becoming essential for commercial transactions.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today