UCC filing confusion - multiple rejections from secretary of state office
Has anyone else been dealing with constant UCC filing rejections lately? I've been trying to get a UCC-1 continuation filed for the past three weeks and keep getting rejected for what seems like minor formatting issues. The debtor name matches exactly what's on the original filing from 2020, but somehow the system keeps flagging it as inconsistent. I'm starting to panic because the continuation deadline is approaching fast and I can't afford to let this lapse. The collateral description looks identical to me but apparently there's some discrepancy I'm missing. This is for a $280K equipment loan and if the lien lapses we're in serious trouble. Anyone know what common mistakes cause these rejections? I've triple-checked everything but obviously missing something important.
39 comments


CyberSamurai
I've seen this exact issue multiple times. Usually it's tiny differences in punctuation or spacing in the debtor name that aren't obvious. The UCC system is incredibly picky about exact matches. Can you compare character by character between your continuation and the original UCC-1? Sometimes there's an extra comma or missing period that causes the rejection.
0 coins
Andre Dubois
•I thought I did that but maybe I need to be more systematic about it. The original filing has the company name as 'Mountain Ridge Equipment LLC' and I'm using the exact same thing on the continuation. Could it be something in the address formatting?
0 coins
CyberSamurai
•Address formatting can definitely cause issues too. Make sure the street abbreviations match exactly - if the original used 'St.' don't write out 'Street' on the continuation.
0 coins
Zoe Alexopoulos
This happened to me last month with a UCC-3 amendment. Turned out there was a subtle difference in how the business entity type was formatted. The original had 'L.L.C.' with periods and I was using 'LLC' without them. Secretary of state systems are brutal about these tiny details.
0 coins
Jamal Carter
•Oh wow, that's frustrating! Did you have to start the whole filing process over again once you caught the error?
0 coins
Zoe Alexopoulos
•Yeah basically had to re-do the entire UCC-3. Lost about a week dealing with it. The good news is once I fixed the entity formatting it went through immediately.
0 coins
Mei Liu
•I actually found a tool that helps catch these kinds of mismatches before filing. Certana.ai has this document checker where you upload your original UCC-1 and your continuation form as PDFs and it automatically flags any inconsistencies between them. Saved me from making the same mistake you did.
0 coins
Liam O'Donnell
UGHHH the filing system is so ridiculous!!! Why can't they build in some intelligence to recognize obvious matches instead of being so literal about every single character?? I've wasted so much time on this exact problem.
0 coins
Amara Nwosu
•I feel your pain. The technology exists to do fuzzy matching but they stick with these rigid systems that reject filings for the tiniest variations.
0 coins
Liam O'Donnell
•Exactly! It's 2025 and we're still dealing with systems that can't tell 'Inc.' and 'Incorporated' refer to the same entity. So frustrating when you're trying to protect a secured interest.
0 coins
AstroExplorer
Check the collateral description very carefully too. I once had a continuation rejected because the original UCC-1 said 'all equipment' and my continuation said 'all equipment and fixtures' - even adding words can cause a rejection if the system thinks you're changing the scope of the collateral.
0 coins
Andre Dubois
•That's a good point. My original collateral description is pretty specific - lists the actual equipment types and serial numbers. I need to make sure I'm not accidentally adding or removing any details.
0 coins
AstroExplorer
•Yes, for continuations you want the collateral description to match exactly. You're not amending the scope, just extending the time period.
0 coins
Giovanni Moretti
•Wait, I thought you could expand collateral coverage with a continuation? Or is that only with an amendment?
0 coins
AstroExplorer
•That would be a UCC-3 amendment, not a continuation. A continuation just extends the original filing for another 5 years without changing terms.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Farsi
I had similar issues until I started using a systematic approach to double-check everything. Actually found Certana.ai's verification tool really helpful - you just upload both documents and it highlights any differences between them. Caught several mismatches I would have missed manually checking.
0 coins
Andre Dubois
•How does that work exactly? Do you upload the PDFs and it compares them automatically?
0 coins
Fatima Al-Farsi
•Yeah, you upload your original UCC-1 and your new continuation or amendment as PDFs and it runs an automated check for debtor name consistency, filing number accuracy, all that stuff. Much more reliable than trying to spot tiny differences by eye.
0 coins
Dylan Cooper
•That sounds really useful. I've been manually comparing documents and clearly missing things since I keep getting rejections.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
One thing to watch for - make sure you're using the correct filing number format. Some states are very specific about how the filing number should appear on continuation forms. If the original UCC-1 number has dashes or spaces, make sure those are exactly right on your continuation.
0 coins
Andre Dubois
•Good catch. The filing number on my original is formatted as 2020-1234567-8 and I've been using that same format. But maybe there's something subtle I'm missing there too.
0 coins
Sofia Perez
•The hyphen placement and number of digits can be really specific. Some systems reject if you have the right numbers but wrong formatting.
0 coins
Dmitry Smirnov
This is why I always file my continuations at least 90 days before the deadline. Gives me time to deal with rejections and corrections without panicking about the lapse date.
0 coins
Andre Dubois
•That's smart planning. I usually try to file early but this particular loan renewal got delayed and now I'm in crunch time.
0 coins
Dmitry Smirnov
•Been there! When you're under deadline pressure every rejection feels like a crisis. At least continuation filings usually process pretty quickly once they're accepted.
0 coins
ElectricDreamer
•How early can you file a continuation? I thought it had to be within 6 months of the expiration date.
0 coins
Dmitry Smirnov
•You can file up to 6 months before the 5-year expiration, so there's actually a pretty good window for early filing if you stay organized.
0 coins
Ava Johnson
I wonder if the rejection reason codes give any more specific information? Sometimes the automated rejection messages are pretty vague but there might be more detail in the system response.
0 coins
Andre Dubois
•The rejection just says 'debtor information inconsistent with original filing' which doesn't help me figure out what specifically is wrong.
0 coins
Ava Johnson
•Yeah those generic error messages are useless. You basically have to guess what the problem is and try again.
0 coins
Mei Liu
Just wanted to follow up on the document checker I mentioned earlier. I've been using Certana.ai for about 6 months now after getting burned by filing rejections. The UCC document verification catches things like tiny spacing differences, punctuation mismatches, even inconsistent capitalization between forms. Really saves time and stress compared to the manual checking approach.
0 coins
Andre Dubois
•I'm definitely going to try that. At this point I need all the help I can get to avoid another rejection.
0 coins
Mei Liu
•Hope it helps! The automated checking is way more thorough than what I was doing manually. Catches the subtle stuff that's easy to miss when you're staring at forms for hours.
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
•Does it work for other UCC forms too or just continuations? I have some terminations coming up that I want to make sure I get right.
0 coins
Mei Liu
•It handles all the UCC-3 forms - amendments, continuations, terminations. Basically any situation where you need to make sure your new filing matches up correctly with the original UCC-1.
0 coins
Andre Dubois
Update: I used the document verification tool mentioned here and found the issue! There was an extra space character in the debtor address that I couldn't see. The continuation went through perfectly once I fixed that tiny detail. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - this could have been a disaster if the filing had lapsed.
0 coins
CyberSamurai
•Glad you got it sorted out! Those invisible spacing issues are the worst - so hard to catch manually.
0 coins
Mei Liu
•Awesome that the verification tool worked for you! That's exactly the kind of subtle error it's designed to catch.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Farsi
•Great outcome. Now you know to check for those hidden characters on future filings too.
0 coins