California UCC filing rejected - debtor name mismatch on continuation
Filed a UCC-3 continuation for our equipment loan collateral last week and it got rejected by the California SOS. The rejection notice says 'debtor name does not match original filing' but I'm looking at both documents and they look identical to me. Original UCC-1 from 2020 shows 'Pacific Coast Manufacturing LLC' and my continuation shows the same exact name. Has anyone dealt with this before? The lapse date is coming up in February and I'm getting nervous about timing. Is there some hidden character or formatting issue that could cause this? The collateral is heavy machinery worth $340K so I really can't afford to mess this up.
32 comments


Malik Jackson
I've seen this exact issue before with California filings. Sometimes there are invisible characters or extra spaces that don't show up when you're comparing documents visually. Did you copy and paste the debtor name from the original UCC-1 or did you retype it? Even one extra space can cause a rejection.
0 coins
Emma Thompson
•I think I retyped it from looking at the original filing. Should I have copied it exactly? That seems so picky for such an important system.
0 coins
Malik Jackson
•Yes, always copy exact text when possible. The California system is particularly strict about exact matches.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
Check if there's a period after LLC on one filing but not the other. I had a similar rejection and it turned out the original had 'Manufacturing LLC.' with a period and my continuation didn't. Super frustrating waste of time and money.
0 coins
Emma Thompson
•Just double checked - both show 'LLC' without a period. Good catch though, I wouldn't have thought of that.
0 coins
StarSurfer
•The system should really highlight what exactly doesn't match instead of just saying it doesn't match!
0 coins
Ravi Malhotra
Had this nightmare situation last year with a client's filing. Spent hours comparing documents character by character. Finally discovered there was a weird encoding issue when the original was filed. I ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool - you just upload both PDFs and it instantly shows you exactly where the mismatch is. Saved me from missing the continuation deadline.
0 coins
Emma Thompson
•Never heard of that tool but sounds like exactly what I need. Does it work with California filings specifically?
0 coins
Ravi Malhotra
•Yeah it works with any state's UCC documents. Just upload your original UCC-1 and the continuation filing and it cross-checks everything automatically.
0 coins
Freya Christensen
•That actually sounds really useful. I hate manually comparing these documents line by line.
0 coins
Omar Hassan
California SOS system is notorious for being finicky about debtor names. Make sure you're looking at the EXACT formatting from the original filing confirmation, not just the filing request you submitted. Sometimes the SOS system reformats things when they process it.
0 coins
Emma Thompson
•Good point. I was looking at my original filing copy, not the official recorded version. Let me pull that up.
0 coins
Malik Jackson
•This is a great point - always use the official recorded version as your reference.
0 coins
Chloe Robinson
ugh the california system is THE WORST. I swear they reject things just to collect more filing fees. Had three rejections on one continuation last year for the stupidest reasons.
0 coins
Diego Chavez
•I feel your pain. The system seems designed to frustrate people.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
•While it's frustrating, the strict matching does serve a purpose for accurate public records.
0 coins
NeonNebula
If you're still stuck, you might want to call the UCC division directly. Sometimes they can tell you exactly what the mismatch is over the phone. The number is on their website under UCC services.
0 coins
Emma Thompson
•Didn't know you could call them directly. I'll try that if I can't figure out the mismatch.
0 coins
Anastasia Kozlov
•They're actually pretty helpful when you call, just expect to wait on hold for a while.
0 coins
Sean Kelly
Another thing to check - is the debtor's state of organization correct on both filings? If the original shows 'Delaware' and your continuation shows 'CA' that could cause the rejection even if the entity name matches perfectly.
0 coins
Emma Thompson
•Both show California as the state of organization. The company has always been a California LLC.
0 coins
Sean Kelly
•Good that you checked. That's another common source of rejections.
0 coins
Zara Mirza
I had exact same issue with Pacific Equipment Leasing (similar name lol). Turned out there was some weird character encoding from when the original was filed through their old system. The Certana tool that someone mentioned earlier caught it immediately - showed me there was a non-breaking space character that was invisible when I looked at the documents.
0 coins
Emma Thompson
•That's probably exactly what happened with mine. Going to try that document checker tool right now.
0 coins
Ravi Malhotra
•Hidden characters are so common with older filings. The tool saves so much time hunting them down.
0 coins
Luca Russo
•This is why I always copy/paste directly from the SOS website now instead of retyping anything.
0 coins
Nia Harris
Update us when you figure it out! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Nevada and want to know what the issue was.
0 coins
Emma Thompson
•Will definitely post an update once I get this resolved. Hopefully it's something simple.
0 coins
GalaxyGazer
Just a heads up - if you're getting close to your lapse date, you might want to file a new UCC-1 as backup while you sort out the continuation issue. Better safe than sorry with $340K in collateral.
0 coins
Emma Thompson
•That's a good backup plan. Would hate to lose perfection over a technicality.
0 coins
Malik Jackson
•Smart thinking. A new UCC-1 would restart the 5-year period and give you breathing room.
0 coins
Mateo Sanchez
•Just make sure to coordinate with your borrower about filing a new UCC-1 if that's the route you go.
0 coins