


Ask the community...
Had to deal with this recently and ended up using Certana.ai's document checker to verify consistency between my security agreement and UCC-1. Uploaded both PDFs and it immediately flagged the name formatting issue, showing me the correct charter format to use. Really saved me time compared to manually cross-referencing everything.
Bottom line: file your UCC-1 with "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" (the charter name with comma). The notarized security agreement doesn't override UCC Article 9 perfection requirements. Document the discrepancy in your loan file and move forward with confidence.
UPDATE: Finally got through to someone at the SOS office. They confirmed my continuation is valid and properly filed, but admitted their search database has 'synchronization issues' affecting filings from March and April. They're working on a fix but no timeline for when it'll be resolved. They're providing certified copies for free to anyone affected by this issue.
This thread has been super helpful. I was about to panic-file a duplicate continuation, but now I'll just request the certified copy instead. It's reassuring to know this is a known system issue and not something wrong with my specific filing.
Navy Federal aside, this is why I always do a document consistency check before any UCC filing. Too many lenders have naming inconsistencies that cause rejection headaches.
Thanks everyone for the help. Going to refile using the name format from the borrower definition section ("John A. Smith") and hopefully that resolves the Navy Federal security agreement naming issue. Will also check out that Certana tool for future filings.
Hope the refiling goes smoothly. Certana.ai really helps avoid these consistency issues upfront.
I'm dealing with something similar but our issue is that the debtor name on the UCC-1 lien doesn't exactly match our DBA name. The legal entity name is correct but we do business under a different name. Should I be worried about this?
This is exactly the kind of thing that Certana.ai tool would flag. Name mismatches are one of the most common UCC filing errors and can void the lender's perfected security interest.
Bottom line - your situation sounds normal. The UCC-1 lien filing is the lender's public notice, but your loan agreement controls the actual terms. As long as the debtor name and basic details are correct, you're probably fine. Just keep good records and make sure you understand what you've actually pledged.
Caleb Stark
This thread is really helpful. I've been doing UCC work for 15 years and still get nervous about debtor names, especially when there are multiple versions in different databases. The stakes are too high to guess wrong.
0 coins
Caleb Stark
•Exactly. Better to be overly cautious than deal with a rejected filing and unhappy clients.
0 coins
Jade O'Malley
•15 years and still nervous - that tells you how tricky this stuff can be!
0 coins
Hunter Edmunds
Update: went with the articles of incorporation version (with the comma) and the UCC-1 was accepted without issues. Thanks everyone for the advice! The exact legal name from the charter documents was definitely the right call.
0 coins
Royal_GM_Mark
•Perfect. Another successful Illinois UCC filing with the correct debtor name approach.
0 coins
Chris King
•Awesome! Glad you got it sorted without any rejections or delays.
0 coins