UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This thread is really helpful. I've been doing UCC work for 15 years and still get nervous about debtor names, especially when there are multiple versions in different databases. The stakes are too high to guess wrong.

0 coins

Exactly. Better to be overly cautious than deal with a rejected filing and unhappy clients.

0 coins

15 years and still nervous - that tells you how tricky this stuff can be!

0 coins

Update: went with the articles of incorporation version (with the comma) and the UCC-1 was accepted without issues. Thanks everyone for the advice! The exact legal name from the charter documents was definitely the right call.

0 coins

Perfect. Another successful Illinois UCC filing with the correct debtor name approach.

0 coins

Awesome! Glad you got it sorted without any rejections or delays.

0 coins

Had to deal with this recently and ended up using Certana.ai's document checker to verify consistency between my security agreement and UCC-1. Uploaded both PDFs and it immediately flagged the name formatting issue, showing me the correct charter format to use. Really saved me time compared to manually cross-referencing everything.

0 coins

That sounds like exactly what I need. Does it work with different document types or just UCC filings?

0 coins

Works with various document combinations - security agreements, UCC-1s, UCC-3s, charter documents. Pretty comprehensive for secured transaction verification.

0 coins

Bottom line: file your UCC-1 with "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" (the charter name with comma). The notarized security agreement doesn't override UCC Article 9 perfection requirements. Document the discrepancy in your loan file and move forward with confidence.

0 coins

Agreed. Sometimes we overthink these situations when the rules are actually pretty straightforward.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the clarity. Filing with the charter name format today. Really appreciate all the real-world experience shared here.

0 coins

UPDATE: Finally got through to someone at the SOS office. They confirmed my continuation is valid and properly filed, but admitted their search database has 'synchronization issues' affecting filings from March and April. They're working on a fix but no timeline for when it'll be resolved. They're providing certified copies for free to anyone affected by this issue.

0 coins

Free certified copies? That's the least they can do after all this hassle. I'm calling them tomorrow to get copies of my missing continuations too.

0 coins

Finally some good news about this mess. I was starting to think they'd lost months worth of filings permanently.

0 coins

This thread has been super helpful. I was about to panic-file a duplicate continuation, but now I'll just request the certified copy instead. It's reassuring to know this is a known system issue and not something wrong with my specific filing.

0 coins

Yeah, knowing it's a widespread problem makes me feel less incompetent. I thought I'd made some huge mistake in my filing.

0 coins

Same here. I've been second-guessing everything about my UCC practice because of these search failures.

0 coins

Navy Federal aside, this is why I always do a document consistency check before any UCC filing. Too many lenders have naming inconsistencies that cause rejection headaches.

0 coins

Yeah, rejection delays are the worst part of UCC filing work. Automated consistency checking is becoming essential.

0 coins

Especially with military credit unions. Their document preparation standards are all over the place.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the help. Going to refile using the name format from the borrower definition section ("John A. Smith") and hopefully that resolves the Navy Federal security agreement naming issue. Will also check out that Certana tool for future filings.

0 coins

Hope the refiling goes smoothly. Certana.ai really helps avoid these consistency issues upfront.

0 coins

Let us know how it works out. Always good to confirm which Navy Federal naming strategy actually works.

0 coins

I'm dealing with something similar but our issue is that the debtor name on the UCC-1 lien doesn't exactly match our DBA name. The legal entity name is correct but we do business under a different name. Should I be worried about this?

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of thing that Certana.ai tool would flag. Name mismatches are one of the most common UCC filing errors and can void the lender's perfected security interest.

0 coins

Oh no, I better look into getting that fixed then. Thanks for the heads up.

0 coins

Bottom line - your situation sounds normal. The UCC-1 lien filing is the lender's public notice, but your loan agreement controls the actual terms. As long as the debtor name and basic details are correct, you're probably fine. Just keep good records and make sure you understand what you've actually pledged.

0 coins

Thanks everyone, this has been really helpful. I feel much better about the situation now.

0 coins

This whole thread has been educational. I had no idea UCC filings were so complex.

0 coins

Prev1...314315316317318...684Next