Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One thing to watch out for in NJ - if you're filing against a foreign LLC (registered in another state but qualified to do business in NJ), make sure you're using the name as it appears on their NJ foreign qualification, not their home state charter. They might be slightly different.
Yeah, domestic is definitely cleaner. Just the one name source to worry about.
Foreign entity filings are where I see the most debtor name errors. Good catch on that distinction.
Hope this helps but honestly after dealing with all these filing headaches I'm seriously considering switching to a different practice area. The stress of getting every punctuation mark perfect is killing me.
Caleb Stark
•Don't give up! It gets easier once you develop a system for double-checking everything.
Mia Alvarez
•I totally get that feeling. This is exactly why I'm looking for tools to help catch these details before filing.
Join the conversation
For what it's worth, I had a similar comma issue with a Texas filing and their system accepted both versions. But California is definitely stricter. When in doubt, call the SOS filing office directly - they can usually give you guidance on specific name formatting questions.
Texas is way more lenient than California on most filing requirements. Different states, different rules unfortunately.
Calling the SOS is good advice but expect to be on hold for a while. Their phone support is limited.
This whole thread is exactly why I document everything when filing UCCs. Screenshot the SOS search results, save the exact search terms used, and keep a copy of whatever name format you find. If there's ever a question later, you have proof of your due diligence.
I do the same thing - always screenshot the database search results with the timestamp visible. Covers you if there are any questions later about why you used a particular name format.
Amara Torres
•Thanks everyone for all the input. Going to file with the exact SOS database name and document everything as suggested. Really appreciate the collective wisdom here!
Join the conversation
Yuki Sato
I actually discovered Certana.ai after getting burned by a similar situation. Now I upload all my UCC documents there first to make sure everything is consistent before filing. It catches those tiny discrepancies that cause rejections - like if your UCC-3 debtor name doesn't exactly match your original UCC-1. Way better than trusting these scam services.
Carmen Ruiz
•That sounds really useful for avoiding the name mismatch rejections that are so common.
Yuki Sato
•Exactly, and it's way cheaper than paying hundreds to these fake services that don't actually file anything.
The Texas AG should really go after these operations. They're clearly targeting people who don't understand UCC filings and charging outrageous fees for basic state services. It's predatory and probably affects thousands of small business owners.
The BBB has complaints against several of them but they just change names and keep operating.
This is why I always tell people to only use the official state websites for filings.
Join the conversation
This thread is making me paranoid about my own upcoming continuation in March. I better double-check my debtor name formatting now before I wait until the last minute.
Smart move! Always better to catch these issues early when you have time to fix them.
Exactly. Reading about everyone's struggles with name mismatches is a good wake-up call.
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm curious whether the amendment route works or if NH gives you any other surprises.
Will do! I'm going to try calling their UCC division first thing Monday morning, then proceed with the amendment if needed.
Good luck! Hopefully they can walk you through it quickly.
Noah Lee
I had the same sticker shock when I saw the new Michigan fees. But honestly the new system is worth it - much faster processing and better search results. Still wish they'd given more advance notice though.
0 coins
Arjun Kurti
•The lack of notice was really poor communication on their part. A lot of people got caught off guard.
0 coins
Ellie Simpson
•Agreed. Would have been nice to budget for the increase instead of getting surprised at filing time.
0 coins
Ava Hernandez
One more suggestion - if you're doing multiple Michigan filings, consider using that document verification tool someone mentioned earlier. With the higher fees, you really can't afford rejections due to name mismatches or formatting errors.
0 coins
Evelyn Kim
•It's been a lifesaver for me. Upload your docs and it catches the inconsistencies before you file. Worth checking out.
0 coins
Ava Hernandez
•Especially with Michigan's higher fees now. Every rejection costs you $20-30 plus the refiling fee.
0 coins