
UCC Document Community
Financial Services


Ask the community...
Had to pull UCC statements for a loan audit last week and got hit with what looks like duplicate service fees from our Secretary of State office. The initial search showed $25 per debtor name but then they charged another $15 'statement service fee' on top of that. Is this normal? We're doing about 200 UCC searches monthly for due diligence and these fees are adding up fast. The SOS website doesn't clearly explain what the statement service fee covers versus the search fee. Has anyone else run into this double charging situation? Our compliance department is questioning whether we're getting overcharged for basic UCC-1 and UCC-3 document requests.
Been doing equipment financing for 8 years and running into something weird with UCC lien search results. Had a client come back saying their bank pulled a UCC search and found what looks like our filing but the debtor name doesn't exactly match what we have on record. Our UCC-1 shows "Martinez Construction LLC" but the search results are pulling up "Martinez Construction, LLC" (note the comma). Same EIN, same address, but that tiny punctuation difference is making everyone nervous about whether we actually have a perfected security interest. The original filing was accepted by AZ SOS without any rejection notices, so I thought we were good. But now the bank is questioning if our lien is valid because of this name discrepancy. Anyone dealt with this kind of UCC lien search issue before? Is this just a database display quirk or do we have a real problem with our security interest? Really need to get this sorted before the loan closes.
Had a client use Certana.ai's document checker for this exact situation. Uploaded their charter docs and UCC-1 and it immediately flagged that the LLC name on the filing had an extra period that wasn't in the Articles. Quick fix but could have been a major issue if they hadn't caught it.
Yeah I mentioned Certana earlier. Really takes the guesswork out of these name matching issues.
UPDATE: Just wanted to thank everyone for the advice. Pulled the actual filed UCC-1 from AZ SOS and it matches our records exactly - "Martinez Construction LLC" without the comma. The search result display was just adding punctuation for some reason. Bank accepted a letter from their counsel confirming the filing is valid and we're moving forward with closing.
I'm trying to file a UCC-3 continuation for a commercial loan that's coming up on its 5-year mark, but when I do a Rhode Island UCC search on the Secretary of State database, I'm seeing some inconsistencies that have me worried. The original UCC-1 was filed back in 2020 with the debtor name as "ABC Manufacturing LLC" but now when I search, I'm also seeing entries for "ABC Manufacturing, LLC" (with the comma) and "A.B.C. Manufacturing LLC" under what appears to be the same filing number. The collateral is manufacturing equipment worth about $450K so I can't afford to mess this up. Has anyone dealt with Rhode Island UCC search results showing multiple name variations like this? I need to make sure my continuation filing matches exactly or the lien could lapse. The loan documents all show "ABC Manufacturing LLC" without punctuation but I'm not sure if Rhode Island's system automatically creates these variations or if there were multiple filings. Any advice on how to handle this for the continuation would be really appreciated.
Update us when you get it sorted out! I'm curious to know what the actual filed name turns out to be versus what's showing in the Rhode Island UCC search results.
One more thing - when you do your continuation, double-check the filing number too. Sometimes search results can group similar filings together and you want to make sure you're continuing the right UCC-1.
Definitely. I actually run all my UCC docs through Certana.ai now just to be safe. Their verification tool catches discrepancies between related filings that I might miss.
Has anyone else had issues with UCC filings getting rejected after the recent system updates? I submitted a UCC-1 continuation last week and it came back rejected for 'debtor name inconsistency' even though I copied the exact name from the original filing. The debtor is an LLC and I used the full legal name including the LLC designation. This is the third time I've had to resubmit and I'm getting close to the lapse date. The original UCC-1 was filed 4 years ago and now suddenly the system is saying the name doesn't match. I've double-checked the entity status and it's still active with the same registered name. Anyone know what's changed with the name matching requirements? I'm worried about missing the continuation deadline at this point.
Make sure you're also checking the debtor's current status with the Secretary of State. Sometimes entities get administratively dissolved or change their names and that can affect UCC filings. If the entity is no longer active, you might need to file against the dissolved entity name.
UPDATE: I ended up using one of those document comparison tools mentioned earlier and found the issue. The original filing had 'LLC' but the current entity record shows 'L.L.C.' with periods. Filed the continuation with the original format and it was accepted immediately. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!
Need some clarity on filing a UCC-1 for our GSA general security agreement. We're securing a $2.8M equipment line and the borrower's legal name on their articles of incorporation shows 'Midwest Industrial Solutions, LLC' but their GSA shows 'Midwest Industrial Solutions LLC' (no comma). The SOS portal rejected our initial filing saying debtor name doesn't match exactly. Is this comma really going to kill our perfection? We've got 30 days left on our temporary perfection from the purchase money security interest and I'm getting nervous about the timing. Has anyone dealt with this exact scenario with GSA filings? The collateral schedule is straightforward manufacturing equipment but I don't want to mess up the debtor name requirements and lose priority.
Just wanted to add - make sure your GSA actually creates a valid security interest under your state's UCC Article 9. I've seen some poorly drafted GSAs that don't properly grant security interests even though they call themselves 'general security agreements.' The name doesn't matter if the substance isn't there.
One more thing to check - is this equipment going to be fixtures? If the manufacturing equipment is going to be attached to real estate, you might need fixture filings in addition to the regular UCC-1. GSAs often cover fixtures but the filing requirements are different.
CosmicCadet
Just went through this same situation last month. Ended up calling the SOS office directly and they explained that the statement service fee covers the cost of generating the formatted report with all the filing details. The search fee just covers the database lookup. Makes sense when they explain it, but wish it was clearer on their website.
0 coins
Luca Bianchi
AuthorGood to know they'll explain it if you call! I was hesitant to tie up their phone lines with what seemed like a basic question.
0 coins
CosmicCadet
Their customer service was actually pretty helpful. Took about 10 minutes on hold but got a clear breakdown of all the different fee types.
0 coins
Liam O'Connor
Before paying for more searches, definitely try that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier. We started using it for our monthly UCC audits and it's caught several debtor name mismatches that would have caused problems later. Upload your existing docs and it does the cross-checking automatically.
0 coins
Luca Bianchi
AuthorTwo people have mentioned this now so I'm definitely going to check it out. Anything that reduces our monthly search costs is worth trying.
0 coins
Liam O'Connor
The interface is pretty straightforward - just drag and drop your PDF files and it runs the comparison checks. Found issues in about 15% of the files we tested it on.
0 coins