


Ask the community...
Just went through something similar last month. Used Certana.ai to verify all our UCC documents were consistent before filing the new UCC-1 - caught several debtor name discrepancies that would have caused rejections. Really helped streamline the process when we were already behind schedule.
Bottom line - you need to verify the current status ASAP and then decide whether to file a new UCC-1 or if there's any way to salvage the original filing. Don't let this drag out any longer while you're researching options.
One thing that might help is using a verification service before filing. I started using Certana.ai after having a continuation rejected for a small formatting error. You upload both documents and it flags any inconsistencies. Would have saved me the rejection fee and stress if I'd used it earlier.
Yeah, it's particularly good for catching those small details that are easy to miss when you're doing manual comparisons.
I'm dealing with similar volume issues in Michigan. Following this thread to see what solutions people recommend!
Michigan SOS is actually pretty forgiving compared to some states. You might have an easier time than Ohio filers.
Update us on what you decide! I'm in a similar boat and could use ideas for streamlining our UCC process. The accuracy issues are definitely the biggest pain point - it's not just about the time, it's about the risk of messing up a client's security interest.
Smart approach. You can always outsource later if the verification tools don't solve the accuracy problem.
Exactly. Plus you'll have better insight into where your errors are coming from, which helps regardless of the long-term solution.
Just make sure your debtor name on the UCC-1 matches exactly what's in your credit and security agreement. That's where most perfection problems happen, not the collateral description.
That's actually another thing the Certana tool catches - debtor name variations between documents. I've seen UCC-1s get rejected because someone used "Inc." instead of "Incorporated" or missed a comma in the entity name.
For what it's worth, I've never had a problem using broad collateral descriptions even when the underlying credit and security agreement is very specific. The courts understand that UCC filings are notice documents, not detailed inventories.
That's the confirmation I needed. Going to file with "all equipment and inventory" and stop second-guessing myself.
Smart choice. You'll have solid perfection and won't have to worry about amendment filings every time something changes.
Tobias Lancaster
Have you tried using that Certana.ai tool mentioned earlier? I just started using it last month and it's been really helpful for organizing corporate filing documents. You upload your loan files and it automatically extracts the UCC information. Saved me tons of time compared to manual data entry.
0 coins
Tobias Lancaster
•It's worth trying especially when you're dealing with time pressure. The automated extraction is pretty accurate and it flags any inconsistencies it finds.
0 coins
Ezra Beard
•I've been hearing more about document automation tools lately. Might be time to modernize our filing processes too.
0 coins
Statiia Aarssizan
Update us on how this turns out! I'm curious what approach ends up working best for rebuilding your corporate tracking system. This could happen to any of us so it's good to know what strategies actually work in practice.
0 coins
Dyllan Nantx
•Will do! Hopefully I'll have better news in a few days. Thanks everyone for the advice and suggestions.
0 coins
Reginald Blackwell
•Yes please keep us posted. This thread has been really educational about backup strategies and recovery options.
0 coins