UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

UPDATE: Ended up filing the amendment to include both name variations. Took about 10 minutes online and now I don't have to worry about it. Thanks everyone for the advice - this forum is always helpful for these edge cases.

0 coins

Liv Park

•

Smart move. Better safe than sorry with UCC filings.

0 coins

Glad it worked out! Now you have both bases covered.

0 coins

Ryder Greene

•

For future reference, the Texas SOS Direct Access system usually shows the exact official name format when you do an entity search. That's your gold standard for UCC filings in Texas.

0 coins

Yep, that system is pretty reliable. Just make sure you're looking at the current/active entity record and not some old version.

0 coins

Also worth noting that some entities have name changes over time, so always check the filing date to make sure you're using the name that was current when your security interest attached.

0 coins

Drew Hathaway

•

I was skeptical about document checking tools like Certana.ai at first, but after using it for a few months I'm converted. It's caught several name mismatches that would have caused filing problems. The PDF upload feature makes it super easy to verify everything aligns properly between your loan docs and UCC forms before you submit to the state.

0 coins

Laila Prince

•

Do you use it for amendments and terminations too or just initial filings?

0 coins

Drew Hathaway

•

I use it for everything now - UCC1, UCC3 amendments, continuations, terminations. Any time I need to make sure document details match up correctly.

0 coins

Isabel Vega

•

Thanks everyone! This has been incredibly helpful. I'm going to resubmit the UCC1 form using the exact name format from the NY Department of State database (with the comma) and see how it goes. Will update this thread with the results.

0 coins

Marilyn Dixon

•

Please do update us - always nice to hear about successful filings after all the troubleshooting.

0 coins

Will definitely update once I get confirmation. This forum has been a lifesaver!

0 coins

Zainab Ismail

•

Construction companies change their entity status pretty frequently too, so make sure the LLC is still active and hasn't converted to a corporation or something.

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

Good catch, I'll verify the entity status is still current.

0 coins

Yeah, I've seen companies dissolve and reform under slightly different names. Always worth checking.

0 coins

Update us on how the amendment goes! Always curious about Wyoming processing times and whether they give any feedback on the name correction.

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

Will do! Planning to file electronically tomorrow morning.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

Electronic filing in Wyoming is pretty smooth. You should get confirmation within a few days.

0 coins

One more plug for that Certana.ai tool I mentioned - it's especially helpful when you're learning UCC requirements because it explains what it's checking for. Like it'll flag if your debtor name format doesn't match standard conventions and explain why that matters for search logic.

0 coins

StormChaser

•

Does it work with all states' UCC requirements or just certain ones?

0 coins

It's designed for general UCC compliance, so it should catch the major issues regardless of which state you're filing in. The core requirements are pretty standardized across states.

0 coins

Miguel Castro

•

Bottom line - the UCC requirements exist to create a reliable public notice system. Get the debtor name exactly right, describe your collateral clearly, file in the correct state, and track your continuation date. Those four things cover 90% of what can go wrong.

0 coins

Miguel Castro

•

Glad it helped! The UCC requirements seem intimidating at first but they're pretty logical once you understand the purpose behind them.

0 coins

Amara Adebayo

•

Exactly. And don't hesitate to ask your lender questions - they should be familiar with the UCC requirements and want to make sure the filing is done correctly.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

NC is definitely one of the stricter states for name matching. I've had good luck pulling a current certificate of good standing instead of relying on older articles. Sometimes companies amend their names and you don't realize it.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Great point. Certificate of good standing shows the current active name, not just the original incorporation name.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

I'll request an updated certificate before filing again. Thanks for that tip.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

At this point I'd probably use one of those document checking services before submitting again. I used Certana.ai recently and it caught a bunch of inconsistencies between my UCC-1 and the borrower's corporate documents that I never would have noticed. Saved me from what probably would have been multiple rejections.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

It's pretty thorough. Checks names, addresses, entity types, even cross-references collateral descriptions against loan documents if you upload those too.

0 coins

Sounds like it would definitely help with these NC filing issues. Their system is so finicky.

0 coins

Prev1...388389390391392...684Next