


Ask the community...
I was skeptical about document checking tools like Certana.ai at first, but after using it for a few months I'm converted. It's caught several name mismatches that would have caused filing problems. The PDF upload feature makes it super easy to verify everything aligns properly between your loan docs and UCC forms before you submit to the state.
Do you use it for amendments and terminations too or just initial filings?
Thanks everyone! This has been incredibly helpful. I'm going to resubmit the UCC1 form using the exact name format from the NY Department of State database (with the comma) and see how it goes. Will update this thread with the results.
Construction companies change their entity status pretty frequently too, so make sure the LLC is still active and hasn't converted to a corporation or something.
Good catch, I'll verify the entity status is still current.
Update us on how the amendment goes! Always curious about Wyoming processing times and whether they give any feedback on the name correction.
Will do! Planning to file electronically tomorrow morning.
Electronic filing in Wyoming is pretty smooth. You should get confirmation within a few days.
One more plug for that Certana.ai tool I mentioned - it's especially helpful when you're learning UCC requirements because it explains what it's checking for. Like it'll flag if your debtor name format doesn't match standard conventions and explain why that matters for search logic.
Does it work with all states' UCC requirements or just certain ones?
Bottom line - the UCC requirements exist to create a reliable public notice system. Get the debtor name exactly right, describe your collateral clearly, file in the correct state, and track your continuation date. Those four things cover 90% of what can go wrong.
NC is definitely one of the stricter states for name matching. I've had good luck pulling a current certificate of good standing instead of relying on older articles. Sometimes companies amend their names and you don't realize it.
Great point. Certificate of good standing shows the current active name, not just the original incorporation name.
I'll request an updated certificate before filing again. Thanks for that tip.
At this point I'd probably use one of those document checking services before submitting again. I used Certana.ai recently and it caught a bunch of inconsistencies between my UCC-1 and the borrower's corporate documents that I never would have noticed. Saved me from what probably would have been multiple rejections.
Charlee Coleman
UPDATE: Ended up filing the amendment to include both name variations. Took about 10 minutes online and now I don't have to worry about it. Thanks everyone for the advice - this forum is always helpful for these edge cases.
0 coins
Liv Park
•Smart move. Better safe than sorry with UCC filings.
0 coins
Leeann Blackstein
•Glad it worked out! Now you have both bases covered.
0 coins
Ryder Greene
For future reference, the Texas SOS Direct Access system usually shows the exact official name format when you do an entity search. That's your gold standard for UCC filings in Texas.
0 coins
Carmella Fromis
•Yep, that system is pretty reliable. Just make sure you're looking at the current/active entity record and not some old version.
0 coins
Theodore Nelson
•Also worth noting that some entities have name changes over time, so always check the filing date to make sure you're using the name that was current when your security interest attached.
0 coins