Wyoming UCC statute interpretation for equipment financing continuation
Running into issues with a Wyoming UCC continuation filing that's coming up on its 5-year mark next month. Our equipment financing deal from 2020 has some collateral description language that might not align perfectly with current Wyoming UCC statute requirements. The original UCC-1 lists 'all machinery and equipment now owned or hereafter acquired' but I'm seeing conflicting info about whether Wyoming requires more specific descriptions for continuation filings. Has anyone dealt with Wyoming's interpretation of the UCC statute recently? The debtor operates a construction company with equipment across multiple counties and I want to make sure we don't lose perfection due to a technicality in the statute's application.
34 comments
Join the conversation
Oliver Schmidt
Wyoming follows pretty standard UCC Article 9 rules for continuations. As long as your original UCC-1 was properly filed, the continuation should just reference the same collateral description. The statute doesn't require you to update or be more specific in the UCC-3 continuation - it's meant to extend the existing perfection, not create new requirements.
0 coins
Natasha Volkov
•That's what I thought too but I've heard some states are getting pickier about equipment descriptions. Better safe than sorry with a construction company's worth of collateral at stake.
0 coins
Javier Torres
•Wyoming SOS portal is pretty straightforward about this - they even have examples showing broad equipment descriptions are fine for continuations.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
I just dealt with this exact situation in Wyoming last quarter! Filed a continuation for a similar equipment deal and had zero issues. The Wyoming UCC statute follows the uniform code pretty closely - your 'all machinery and equipment' language should be perfectly fine. Just make sure you're filing the UCC-3 continuation before the 6-month window closes.
0 coins
Amina Diop
•Thanks, that's reassuring. Did you run into any issues with the debtor name matching exactly? Our borrower did a slight name change last year but nothing that affected their legal entity status.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•Name matching is crucial - even minor changes can cause problems. If they changed their legal name, you might need to file an amendment first before the continuation.
0 coins
QuantumLeap
•Actually ran into a similar name issue recently and found this document verification tool called Certana.ai that catches these mismatches before filing. You just upload your charter docs and UCC forms and it flags any inconsistencies. Saved me from a rejected filing when I missed a subtle name difference.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
Wyoming statute is generally lender-friendly but don't mess around with the timing. You have that 6-month window before the 5-year mark but I always file at least 90 days early. Equipment financing deals are too valuable to risk a lapse in perfection.
0 coins
Isabella Santos
•Agreed on the timing but 90 days seems excessive. I usually do 30-45 days and never had issues.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
•Maybe excessive but it gives you time to fix any problems if the filing gets rejected. I've seen too many deals where they cut it close and something went wrong.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
WYOMING IS THE WORST for UCC filings!!! Their online system crashes constantly and their staff gives different answers every time you call. I've had three continuations rejected this year for bogus reasons that made no sense under the statute.
0 coins
Oliver Schmidt
•That seems unusual - Wyoming's system has been pretty reliable in my experience. What kinds of rejection reasons were you getting?
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•Debtor name 'discrepancies' that weren't actually discrepancies, collateral descriptions they claimed were 'too vague' even though they were identical to accepted original filings. It's like they change the rules randomly.
0 coins
Freya Larsen
•Sounds like you might have had some actual document inconsistencies. Those rejections usually have valid technical reasons even if they're not obvious.
0 coins
Omar Hassan
Check the Wyoming Secretary of State website - they have updated guidance on UCC filings that clarifies the statute requirements. Construction equipment deals are common there so they're used to broad collateral descriptions.
0 coins
Amina Diop
•Good point, I should check their most recent guidance. Do they publish any specific examples for equipment financing?
0 coins
Omar Hassan
•Yes, they have sample forms and descriptions. Equipment and machinery categories are well-covered in their examples.
0 coins
Chloe Taylor
Had a Wyoming continuation rejected last month because of a tiny mismatch between the debtor name on our UCC-1 and their current charter. The statute requires exact matches and Wyoming enforces it strictly. Ended up using that Certana verification thing someone mentioned earlier - uploaded all our docs and it caught several inconsistencies we missed manually.
0 coins
ShadowHunter
•How does that Certana tool work exactly? Just curious if it's worth the cost for occasional filings.
0 coins
Chloe Taylor
•Super simple - you upload PDFs of your charter, UCC-1, and whatever continuation or amendment you're preparing. It automatically cross-checks names, filing numbers, dates, everything. Found discrepancies in minutes that would have taken me hours to spot manually.
0 coins
Diego Ramirez
•That actually sounds useful for our volume of filings. We do dozens of Wyoming continuations each year and name matching is always a headache.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
Wyoming UCC statute is pretty standard but their filing fees are reasonable compared to other states. I'd focus more on getting your documents perfectly aligned than worrying about the statute interpretation - that's where most problems occur.
0 coins
Sean O'Connor
•Exactly right. The statute is clear, it's the execution that trips people up.
0 coins
Amina Diop
•Makes sense. I'll double-check all our document alignment before filing. Thanks everyone for the input.
0 coins
Zara Ahmed
One thing to watch with Wyoming - they sometimes flag out-of-state addresses differently than other states. Make sure your debtor address formatting matches exactly what's in their system from the original filing.
0 coins
Luca Conti
•Good catch - address formatting can definitely cause rejections even when the underlying information is correct.
0 coins
Nia Johnson
•Wyoming is pretty flexible with addresses in my experience, but consistency between filings is key.
0 coins
CyberNinja
Just to add - Wyoming statute allows for reasonable collateral descriptions and 'all equipment' language has been consistently accepted there. Your continuation should go through fine as long as everything else matches up properly.
0 coins
Mateo Lopez
•That's consistent with what I've seen. Wyoming doesn't overcomplicate the UCC requirements.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•Right, they stick pretty close to the model UCC statute without adding weird state-specific twists.
0 coins
Ethan Davis
File early and double-check everything. Wyoming processes continuations quickly when they're done right, but rejections can eat up valuable time in that 6-month window. The statute gives you flexibility but the execution has to be precise.
0 coins
Amina Diop
•Perfect, that's exactly the kind of practical advice I needed. I'll get this filed within the next two weeks to give myself plenty of buffer time.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•Smart approach. Better to file early and relax than wait and stress about potential problems.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
•Yep, equipment deals are too important to risk timing issues. Get it done early and move on to the next deal.
0 coins