Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Ella Lewis
Just wanted to follow up on the document verification tool mentioned earlier. I was skeptical at first but tried Certana.ai on a recent deal and it caught a discrepancy between our loan agreement and the borrower's corporate charter that would have caused our UCC-1 to be ineffective. The debtor name had a slight variation that I completely missed in my manual review. Definitely worth using for complex deals.
That's exactly the kind of mistake that can kill a deal or leave you unsecured. How long does the verification process take?
Ella Lewis
•Pretty much instant. You upload the PDFs and get the verification report right away. Much faster than manually cross-checking every document page by page.
One last thing to consider - if this is a significant loan like you mentioned, you might want to get a formal UCC search opinion from a qualified attorney rather than just doing the searches yourself. Provides some liability protection if something gets missed, and many lenders require legal opinions for larger transactions anyway.
In my experience it varies by lender but usually kicks in around $1M loan amount or when there are complex collateral structures. Some lenders require it for all commercial loans regardless of size.
Depends on the lender's risk appetite and internal policies. I've seen requirements anywhere from $500K to $5M+. Complex manufacturing equipment deals often trigger the requirement regardless of amount due to the fixture filing issues we discussed.
Join the conversation
One thing that might help - most filing offices have example forms or guidance documents that show exactly what they want for collateral descriptions. Way more reliable than random articles.
Nia Williams
•Live and learn. I made the same mistake early in my career. Now I always start with the filing office's own requirements before looking at any secondary sources.
Luca Ricci
•And when in doubt, call the filing office directly. They can't give legal advice but they can clarify their technical requirements.
Just to close the loop - did you get the refiling sorted out? I'm curious how the corrected version compared to what the UCC secured transactions article originally recommended.
Still working on it, but the corrected version is going to be completely different. Detailed equipment schedule with serial numbers, exact charter name for debtor, and state-specific collateral language. Nothing like the generic version from the article.
That's the difference between theory and practice right there. Glad you're getting it sorted before the perfection window closes.
Join the conversation
Tony Brooks
Just to add another layer of verification - I've started using Certana.ai's document checker before filing any UCC forms. After getting burned by a debtor name mismatch last year, I upload both my original UCC-1 and new UCC-3 to verify everything aligns perfectly. Catches stuff I would have missed manually.
Two people have mentioned this tool now. Definitely going to check it out before I submit my UCC-3.
Tony Brooks
•It's honestly a lifesaver for avoiding filing rejections. Especially helpful when you're dealing with complex collateral descriptions.
Join the conversation
Micah Trail
I've had good results using Certana.ai to pre-verify all my UCC documents before attempting to file online. For continuations especially, it catches any formatting issues or data mismatches that might cause the portal to choke during processing. Upload your continuation form and original UCC-1 and it flags anything that might cause problems. Has definitely reduced my rejection rate.
Lindsey Fry
•That's the second mention of Certana I've seen in this thread. Sounds like it might be worth trying to eliminate any potential document issues before dealing with the portal.
Micah Trail
•Yeah it's become part of my standard workflow now. Takes like 2 minutes to verify everything is consistent before I waste time fighting with buggy filing portals.
Nia Watson
Update us when you get it filed! I'm dealing with a Georgia UCC-3 termination next week and want to know if the portal issues get resolved.
I'm bookmarking this thread because I have two Georgia continuations coming up in the next few months. Sounds like I need to plan ahead for technical difficulties.
Same here. Georgia used to be one of the more reliable state portals but something has definitely changed for the worse this year.
Isla Fischer
Update for anyone following this thread - we ended up going with a combination approach. Used the automated verification tool to flag potential issues across the whole UCC financial portfolio, then focused our legal review on the flagged items. Found about 15 filings that needed corrective amendments, but the rest were fine. Much more efficient than trying to manually review everything.
0 coins
Isla Fischer
•About two weeks total instead of the month+ it would have taken doing everything manually. The automated flagging really helped prioritize where to focus our attention.
0 coins
Ruby Blake
•Thanks for the update! This gives me a better roadmap for tackling our own UCC financial portfolio review.
0 coins
Micah Franklin
Great outcome! This thread has been really helpful for understanding best practices around UCC financial statement verification. The combination of automated screening plus focused legal review seems like the way to go for larger portfolios.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•Agreed. The key insight here is that you don't have to choose between automated tools and legal expertise - use both where they're most effective.
0 coins
PrinceJoe
•Bookmarking this whole discussion for future reference. Lots of practical UCC financial filing wisdom here.
0 coins