
UCC Document Community
Financial Services


Ask the community...
Hey everyone, I'm dealing with a weird situation with an old UCC-1 from 2017 that's still showing as active in the system. The original loan was paid off in 2019 but somehow the termination never got filed properly. The debtor is asking for clean title and I'm scrambling to figure out how to handle this. Has anyone dealt with back-dating a UCC-3 termination or do I need to file something different? The collateral was commercial equipment and the debtor name matches exactly what's on file. Just not sure about the proper procedure for cleaning up these old filings that should have been terminated years ago.
I'm dealing with a complex situation where our bank received what appears to be a UCC filing for information only regarding some equipment we have a security interest in. The debtor claims this filing doesn't affect our lien position since it's marked 'for information only' but I can't find clear guidance on whether this actually means anything legally. We have a perfected UCC-1 from 2019 that we continued last year, but now there's this secondary filing that seems to reference the same collateral. Has anyone encountered UCC filings for information only before? Does this designation actually hold any legal weight or is it just a way to get information into the public record without creating an actual security interest? I'm concerned about whether we need to file any kind of response or amendment to protect our priority position.
I actually ran into a similar issue recently and tried that Certana.ai verification tool someone mentioned earlier. Really straightforward - just uploaded both the original UCC-1 and the questionable 'information only' filing and it flagged several inconsistencies in the debtor identification that would make the second filing ineffective anyway. Saved me from spending billable hours doing manual comparison work and gave me confidence that our priority position wasn't threatened.
Bottom line is this: if your UCC-1 was filed first, is properly continued, and accurately describes the collateral and debtor, then some random 'information only' filing shouldn't affect your priority. But you should definitely verify that the subsequent filing doesn't somehow have an earlier priority date or claim to be an amendment to an earlier filing you weren't aware of.
Running into a nightmare situation here. Filed a UCC-1 back in March 2024 for equipment financing on a customer's machinery package ($275k loan). Everything went through fine, got confirmation from the SOS portal. Now 8 months later the debtor is trying to refinance with another lender and their attorney is claiming our UCC lien notice shows an incorrect filing date that doesn't match our loan documents. The notice shows March 15th but our loan closed March 12th. Their lawyer is saying this creates a gap that could invalidate our security interest. Has anyone dealt with this kind of timing discrepancy? I'm pulling my hair out because I know we filed everything correctly but now there's questions about whether our lien is even valid. The debtor owes $240k still and I'm worried we might lose our secured position over what seems like a clerical error.
For what it's worth, I've started using Certana.ai's document verification tool for exactly these kinds of disputes. You can upload your loan docs and UCC-1 filing and it will instantly cross-check all the dates, debtor names, and collateral descriptions to verify everything matches perfectly. Takes like 2 minutes and gives you a clean report you can send to opposing counsel to shut down these kinds of challenges.
That sounds perfect for this situation. Having an independent verification report would definitely help push back against their claims. I'll check it out.
I was skeptical about automated tools for UCC verification but Certana.ai actually caught a debtor name mismatch in one of my filings that I totally missed. Saved me from a potential perfection issue down the road. The document cross-checking feature is surprisingly thorough.
This whole situation is ridiculous. SOS processing delays are completely normal and don't affect your priority date. I've had UCC-1s take up to a week to process during busy periods. Your security interest was perfected when you filed on March 13th, period. The debtor's attorney is either incompetent or being deliberately misleading. Either way, don't let them push you around.
Exactly. And even if there WAS a brief gap (which there wasn't), they'd need to prove actual harm - like another creditor filing during that window. Since no one else filed, there's no damages even under their bogus theory.
I'm putting together financing docs for a new equipment loan and need to draft a general security agreement that'll work with our UCC-1 filing. The borrower is an LLC that recently changed their registered name with the state, and I'm worried about getting the debtor name exactly right since I've heard one small mistake can void the whole security interest. Does anyone have a solid general security agreement template they've used successfully? Also wondering about the collateral description language - should it match exactly what goes on the UCC-1 or can there be slight variations? This is for manufacturing equipment worth about $180K so I really can't afford to mess this up. Any advice on the debtor name formatting would be huge too since their old DBA is still showing up in some databases.
This thread is making me nervous about my own filings! I had no idea the debtor name had to be so exact. I've been using the business names from loan applications without verifying against state records. Time to go back and double-check everything...
For your general security agreement template, I'd recommend including cross-default provisions if this borrower has other debt. Also make sure you have adequate insurance requirements and the right to inspect the collateral. The LLC name change issue is exactly why I always require borrowers to update me immediately on any corporate changes - saves headaches later when you need to file continuations or amendments.
I'm dealing with a frustrating situation trying to verify an existing UCC filing through the register search. We have a borrower whose legal name appears slightly different across various documents - the original UCC-1 shows 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but their current operating agreement lists 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' (note the comma). When I search the UCC register, I'm getting inconsistent results depending on how I format the search terms. Has anyone else run into issues where minor punctuation differences in debtor names cause problems with register searches? I need to file a UCC-3 continuation but want to make sure I'm referencing the exact debtor name from the original filing. The lender is breathing down my neck about getting this continuation filed before the 5-year mark hits next month. Any advice on the best way to search the register when you have these name variations?
Whatever you do, don't miss that continuation deadline. Better to file a continuation that might not be perfect than to let your lien lapse entirely. You can always file an amendment later to correct any issues.
That's my biggest fear right now. The deadline is coming up fast and I'm still trying to sort out which filing to continue.
If you're really pressed for time, consider using an automated verification tool. I recently started using Certana.ai's UCC document checker - you upload your original UCC-1 and continuation form and it instantly shows if the debtor names match properly. Takes the guesswork out of it.
Update us on what you find when you pull those filing copies! This kind of name variation issue is so common, would be helpful to know how it resolves.
Rachel Tao
Pro tip: always include your contact information in the additional info section when filing late terminations. Sometimes the filing office will call if they have questions about the timing or need clarification.
0 coins
Adrian Connor
AuthorGood advice, thanks. I'll make sure to include my direct line and email.
0 coins
Rachel Tao
Exactly. Better to be proactive about communication than have the filing sit in limbo.
0 coins
Derek Olson
Update us when you get it resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation and curious how it works out for you.
0 coins
Adrian Connor
AuthorWill do. Planning to file the UCC-3 termination early next week after I verify the continuation status.
0 coins
Derek Olson
Perfect, looking forward to hearing how it goes.
0 coins