


Ask the community...
I actually ran into a similar issue recently and tried that Certana.ai verification tool someone mentioned earlier. Really straightforward - just uploaded both the original UCC-1 and the questionable 'information only' filing and it flagged several inconsistencies in the debtor identification that would make the second filing ineffective anyway. Saved me from spending billable hours doing manual comparison work and gave me confidence that our priority position wasn't threatened.
Bottom line is this: if your UCC-1 was filed first, is properly continued, and accurately describes the collateral and debtor, then some random 'information only' filing shouldn't affect your priority. But you should definitely verify that the subsequent filing doesn't somehow have an earlier priority date or claim to be an amendment to an earlier filing you weren't aware of.
For what it's worth, I've started using Certana.ai's document verification tool for exactly these kinds of disputes. You can upload your loan docs and UCC-1 filing and it will instantly cross-check all the dates, debtor names, and collateral descriptions to verify everything matches perfectly. Takes like 2 minutes and gives you a clean report you can send to opposing counsel to shut down these kinds of challenges.
That sounds perfect for this situation. Having an independent verification report would definitely help push back against their claims. I'll check it out.
I was skeptical about automated tools for UCC verification but Certana.ai actually caught a debtor name mismatch in one of my filings that I totally missed. Saved me from a potential perfection issue down the road. The document cross-checking feature is surprisingly thorough.
This whole situation is ridiculous. SOS processing delays are completely normal and don't affect your priority date. I've had UCC-1s take up to a week to process during busy periods. Your security interest was perfected when you filed on March 13th, period. The debtor's attorney is either incompetent or being deliberately misleading. Either way, don't let them push you around.
Exactly. And even if there WAS a brief gap (which there wasn't), they'd need to prove actual harm - like another creditor filing during that window. Since no one else filed, there's no damages even under their bogus theory.
This thread is making me nervous about my own filings! I had no idea the debtor name had to be so exact. I've been using the business names from loan applications without verifying against state records. Time to go back and double-check everything...
For your general security agreement template, I'd recommend including cross-default provisions if this borrower has other debt. Also make sure you have adequate insurance requirements and the right to inspect the collateral. The LLC name change issue is exactly why I always require borrowers to update me immediately on any corporate changes - saves headaches later when you need to file continuations or amendments.
Whatever you do, don't miss that continuation deadline. Better to file a continuation that might not be perfect than to let your lien lapse entirely. You can always file an amendment later to correct any issues.
That's my biggest fear right now. The deadline is coming up fast and I'm still trying to sort out which filing to continue.
If you're really pressed for time, consider using an automated verification tool. I recently started using Certana.ai's UCC document checker - you upload your original UCC-1 and continuation form and it instantly shows if the debtor names match properly. Takes the guesswork out of it.
Update us on what you find when you pull those filing copies! This kind of name variation issue is so common, would be helpful to know how it resolves.
Rachel Tao
Pro tip: always include your contact information in the additional info section when filing late terminations. Sometimes the filing office will call if they have questions about the timing or need clarification.
0 coins
Adrian Connor
•Good advice, thanks. I'll make sure to include my direct line and email.
0 coins
Rachel Tao
•Exactly. Better to be proactive about communication than have the filing sit in limbo.
0 coins
Derek Olson
Update us when you get it resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation and curious how it works out for you.
0 coins
Adrian Connor
•Will do. Planning to file the UCC-3 termination early next week after I verify the continuation status.
0 coins
Derek Olson
•Perfect, looking forward to hearing how it goes.
0 coins