UCC lien search Nevada - debtor name variations causing missed results?
Running into some frustrating issues with UCC lien search Nevada and wondering if anyone else has dealt with this. I'm doing due diligence on a potential acquisition and the target company has gone through several name changes over the past 8 years. When I search the Nevada SOS UCC database, I'm getting different results depending on how I enter the debtor name - sometimes showing active liens, sometimes showing nothing at all for what should be the same entity. The company was originally incorporated as 'Desert Innovations LLC' but has been doing business as 'Desert Innovation Group LLC' and 'Desert Innovation Solutions LLC' at different times. I've found what appears to be the same UCC-1 filing under two different name variations, but the collateral descriptions don't match exactly either. One shows 'all equipment and fixtures' while another shows 'manufacturing equipment, accounts receivable, and inventory.' Are these separate filings or am I missing something about how Nevada handles debtor name searches? This is holding up our entire due diligence timeline and I need to make sure we're not missing any secured interests.
32 comments
Join the conversation
NebulaNinja
Nevada's UCC search system is notoriously picky about exact name matches. Even minor punctuation differences can cause filings to not show up in your results. Have you tried searching without the LLC designation? Sometimes the system treats 'Desert Innovations LLC' and 'Desert Innovations, LLC' as completely different entities.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
•This is so true. I missed a major lien last year because of a comma placement difference in the debtor name. Cost our firm a lot of headaches when it surfaced during closing.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•I did try a few variations but honestly the Nevada portal interface is pretty clunky. Getting inconsistent results even when I think I'm searching the same name format.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
You're dealing with one of the biggest challenges in UCC due diligence right now. Name variations are a nightmare, especially with Nevada's system. What you really need is to cross-reference all the documents you've found to make sure they're internally consistent. I recently started using Certana.ai's document verification tool - you can upload your Charter documents and UCC-1 filings as PDFs and it automatically checks for name mismatches and inconsistencies between documents. Saved me from missing a critical discrepancy where the debtor name on the UCC-1 didn't exactly match the articles of incorporation.
0 coins
Sofia Morales
•How does that work exactly? Do you just upload the PDFs and it compares them automatically?
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Yeah, it's pretty straightforward - upload your charter docs and UCC filings, and it runs through all the names, entity numbers, addresses to flag any inconsistencies. Much faster than trying to manually compare everything, especially when you're dealing with multiple name variations like this case.
0 coins
Dmitry Popov
•Sounds useful but I'm always skeptical of automated tools for something this important. Have you actually caught mistakes with it?
0 coins
Ava Garcia
The collateral description differences you mentioned are definitely concerning. Those sound like they could be separate filings altogether, not just name variations. 'All equipment and fixtures' vs 'manufacturing equipment, accounts receivable, and inventory' suggests different secured parties or different loan facilities. You need to pull the actual UCC-1 forms and compare the secured party information and filing dates.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•That's what I was afraid of. The filing dates are about 18 months apart, so they're definitely separate transactions. Just trying to figure out if they're both still active or if one was terminated.
0 coins
StarSailor}
•Check for UCC-3 termination statements. Sometimes these don't show up clearly in the search results but they're critical for determining current lien status.
0 coins
Miguel Silva
Nevada SOS system drives me crazy!! I swear it's designed to make you miss things. Last month I had to search like 15 different name combinations for one debtor because their corporate records showed slight variations over time. And don't even get me started on how it handles merged entities...
0 coins
Zainab Ismail
•Ugh yes the merger situation is even worse. I had a client where the original debtor was merged into another entity and the UCC search results were completely unreliable.
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
•At least Nevada has decent continuation tracking. Some states are way worse about expired filings still showing as active.
0 coins
Yara Nassar
For name variations in Nevada, try these search strategies: 1) Search with and without punctuation, 2) Try abbreviations vs spelled out words (Corp vs Corporation, Co vs Company), 3) Search individual words from the name separately, 4) Check if there are any trade names or DBAs registered. The Nevada SOS also has a separate business entity search that might give you additional name variations to try in the UCC search.
0 coins
Keisha Robinson
•This is solid advice. I'd add that you should also search the federal tax ID number if you have it - sometimes that pulls up filings that name searches miss.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•Good point about the business entity search. I should cross-reference what names are actually on file with Nevada SOS vs what I'm finding in the UCC database.
0 coins
GalaxyGuardian
•Also worth checking if the company has any assumed name certificates on file. Those don't always link cleanly to UCC filings.
0 coins
Paolo Ricci
Been doing UCC searches in Nevada for 12 years and the name matching issues have gotten worse, not better. The system seems more rigid now than it used to be. Your best bet is to be extremely systematic - create a spreadsheet of every possible name variation and search each one individually. Also check continuation dates - Nevada has some quirks about how they display continued vs expired filings.
0 coins
Amina Toure
•What kind of continuation quirks? I thought Nevada was pretty standard on the 5-year rule.
0 coins
Paolo Ricci
•The timing is standard but their search results sometimes don't clearly indicate continuation status. I've seen filings that looked active but were actually lapsed because a continuation was filed incorrectly.
0 coins
Oliver Zimmermann
Had a similar issue last quarter with a Nevada entity search. Ended up finding three different UCC filings under slight name variations that we almost missed. What finally solved it was uploading all the documents I'd collected - charters, UCC forms, corporate resolutions - into Certana.ai's verification system. It flagged that two of the filings had inconsistent debtor names compared to the actual corporate documents, which helped me understand which ones were potentially problematic. Turns out one was filed with an incorrect name variation and should have been amended years ago.
0 coins
Natasha Volkova
•That's exactly the kind of thing that can cause huge problems at closing. Glad you caught it early.
0 coins
Dmitry Popov
•Okay that's actually a pretty compelling use case for the automated checking. If it caught a name inconsistency that could void the filing, that's valuable.
0 coins
Javier Torres
Quick question - are you searching as 'exact match' or 'contains'? Nevada's default search settings can be tricky and you might be missing results if you're not using the right search parameters.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•I've been using exact match mostly. Should I switch to contains for broader results?
0 coins
Javier Torres
•Try both. Contains will give you more false positives but you might catch filings you're missing with exact match, especially if there are spacing or punctuation differences.
0 coins
Emma Davis
Don't forget to check the organizational ID number if the entity has one. Sometimes Nevada's UCC system will find filings by org ID that don't show up in name searches, especially if there were data entry errors when the UCC was originally filed.
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
•Good catch. Nevada assigns those NV numbers to all entities and they're supposed to be consistent across all state filings.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
•Though I've seen cases where the NV number on the UCC doesn't match the corporate records either. Data quality in these systems is just not great.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
This whole thread is why I always budget extra time for Nevada UCC searches. The name variation issue is real and can completely derail your due diligence timeline if you're not prepared for it. Document everything you find and keep detailed notes about which search terms produced which results - you'll need that trail later when you're trying to explain any gaps to your client or opposing counsel.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•Absolutely. And make sure you're printing or saving PDFs of the actual filing documents, not just relying on the search result summaries.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•Thanks everyone, this has been incredibly helpful. Going to go back and run a much more comprehensive search with all these strategies before I finalize my lien report.
0 coins