
UCC Document Community
Financial Services


Ask the community...
Been dealing with this nightmare for 3 weeks now. Have a UCC-1 that expires next month and every time I submit the UCC-3 continuation through Hawaii's filing system it gets rejected for "debtor name discrepancy." The original filing has the debtor as "Pacific Equipment Leasing LLC" and I'm entering it exactly the same way on the continuation. Called the filing office twice and they just say "names must match exactly" but won't tell me what's wrong. This is a $2.8M equipment loan and if this continuation lapses we're screwed. Has anyone dealt with Hawaii's system being this picky about exact formatting? The original UCC-1 was filed by the previous lender's attorney 4 years ago so I can't ask them what they did differently. Running out of time here and getting desperate.
Submitted a UCC-1 last week for a commercial equipment loan and got it rejected today. The rejection notice says 'debtor name does not match entity records' but I triple-checked the business name against their articles of incorporation. The debtor is 'TechFlow Solutions LLC' exactly as shown on their charter documents. Portal keeps rejecting it and my client is getting antsy about the loan closing. Has anyone dealt with this type of name matching issue? I'm wondering if there's some formatting requirement I'm missing or if the database has outdated information. This is holding up a $280K equipment financing deal and I need to get this perfected ASAP.
Question for the group - do you always use the full legal name from the articles or sometimes the DBA name? I've seen conflicting advice on this and want to make sure I'm doing it right.
This whole thread is gold. I'm bookmarking it for future reference. The name formatting issues seem to be the biggest pain point for UCC filings based on everyone's experiences here.
We paid off our equipment loan three months ago but the UCC filing is still showing as active on our credit reports. The original UCC-1 was filed under our old business name (we changed it six months before the loan was finalized but somehow the old name got used). Now the lender is saying they can't file the UCC-3 termination because the debtor name on their records doesn't exactly match what's on the original filing. They want US to handle the UCC removal process but I'm not sure we can legally do that as the debtor. This is affecting our ability to get new financing for expansion. Has anyone dealt with this kind of debtor name mismatch situation for UCC removal? Do we need to get an amendment first or can the termination reference both names? The filing is in Delaware and shows our federal tax ID correctly but the business name is off by one word.
Had a similar issue two years ago with a different kind of name problem. What finally worked was getting our attorney to send a letter to the bank's general counsel explaining the UCC requirements and demanding immediate compliance. Sometimes legal letterhead gets attention that borrower complaints don't.
Our attorney charged about $500 for the letter. Bank filed the termination within a week after receiving it. Probably cheaper than the financing delays you're facing.
Before you go the legal route, try one more approach with the lender. Ask to speak with their UCC specialist or secured transactions department. The regular loan servicing people often don't understand UCC procedures, but most large lenders have specialists who handle these filings correctly.
Ask the loan servicing rep to transfer you to 'secured transactions' or 'UCC administration.' If they don't have a separate department, ask for their supervisor who handles UCC terminations.
I'm running into something strange with Missouri UCC searches and hoping someone can help. We're doing due diligence on a acquisition target and when I search their exact legal name in the Missouri SOS database, I get completely different results depending on how I format it. The company is 'Midwest Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but if I search 'Midwest Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' (with the comma) or 'Midwest Mfg Solutions LLC' I get totally different UCC filings showing up. Some show active liens, others don't. This is making it impossible to get a clear picture of what's actually filed against them. Has anyone dealt with Missouri UCC search quirks like this? I'm worried we're missing critical filings because of name variations.
This is why I hate Missouri deals. Their UCC search is so unreliable compared to states like Delaware or New York. You basically have to become a detective to make sure you're not missing anything.
Here's what I do for Missouri UCC searches: 1) Search exact legal name 2) Remove all punctuation 3) Try common abbreviations 4) Search without entity type 5) Check historical names 6) Use wildcard variations 7) Cross-reference with business registration database. It's tedious but catches everything.
I create a spreadsheet with filing numbers, dates, and secured parties. Then I sort by filing number to eliminate duplicates. The key is the unique filing number - same filing can show up under different name searches.
Been waiting 3 weeks now for the secretary of state office to process my UCC-3 continuation filing. The original UCC-1 expires in 2 months and I'm getting nervous about the timing. I submitted everything electronically through their portal but it's still showing 'pending review' status. Has anyone else experienced these delays with continuation forms? I've got a $2.8M equipment loan riding on this and can't afford to let the lien lapse. The debtor name matches exactly from the original filing so I don't think that's the issue. Should I be calling them daily at this point or is there something else I should be doing while awaiting forms for UCC processing?
Try checking the filing search database directly instead of just the portal status. Sometimes you can find your filed continuation in the public records even when the submission portal shows it as pending.
This is another thing Certana.ai helps with - it can search multiple databases and cross-reference your filings to make sure everything is properly recorded. Takes the guesswork out of tracking multiple UCC documents.
UPDATE: Called the UCC hotline this morning and you were all right - it was actually processed 5 days ago but their system wasn't updating the status. Got the filing number for the continuation and it's showing as active in the database. Thanks everyone for the advice about calling directly!
Luis Johnson
Just to confirm - you're filing a UCC-3 continuation, not a UCC-3 amendment, right? I ask because continuation vs amendment gets confused sometimes and they have different requirements for name matching.
0 coins
Hunter Hampton
AuthorYes, definitely filing a continuation. The UCC-1 expires next month so I need to extend the effectiveness period.
0 coins
Luis Johnson
Good, just wanted to make sure. Continuations should be straightforward if the names match exactly.
0 coins
Chloe Zhang
Update us when you figure this out! I'm dealing with Hawaii filings regularly and would love to know what the actual issue was. These mystery rejections are so frustrating when you're working against a deadline.
0 coins
Ellie Kim
Hope you get it sorted out. That deadline pressure is the worst part of these filing issues.
0 coins
Fiona Sand
Following this thread too. Have a Hawaii continuation coming up and want to avoid the same problems.
0 coins