UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Emma Taylor

•

File the new UCC-1 TODAY if you haven't already. Every day you wait makes it worse. Then get a game plan together for the lender meeting. Show them you understand the seriousness and have taken immediate action to protect their interests going forward.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Already working on it. Should have the new filing done by end of business today.

0 coins

Emma Taylor

•

Good - speed shows you're taking this seriously. That counts for a lot in these situations.

0 coins

This thread is giving me anxiety about my own UCC timing. I have 3 continuations due this year and now I'm second-guessing my calendar system. Maybe I should look into that Certana tool people mentioned for tracking deadlines.

0 coins

Trust me, invest in a good system now. The timing of UCC filings will bite you eventually if you don't have proper tracking.

0 coins

Miguel Diaz

•

Certana does help with deadline monitoring too. Worth checking out before you have your own crisis.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

Timeline is important here. UCC searches are only as good as the date you run them. With your few-week deadline, you'll want to run updated searches right before closing to make sure no new filings have appeared.

0 coins

Carmen Flores

•

Most title companies will run updated searches as part of the closing process, but it's good to stay on top of it yourself.

0 coins

Andre Dubois

•

With manufacturing equipment, there's also the possibility of new purchase money security interests being filed by parts suppliers or service companies.

0 coins

CyberSamurai

•

Update: Thanks for all the advice. Ended up doing a comprehensive search that found two UCC-1 filings I initially missed - one under a slightly different corporate name and another that was a continuation of an older filing. Working with the secured parties now to get releases for the specific equipment we want. The Certana tool mentioned earlier was really helpful for organizing all the documents and making sure everything matched up properly.

0 coins

Jamal Carter

•

Smart move getting the releases in advance. Some lenders can be slow to respond to release requests.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

Good outcome. This is exactly why thorough searches are worth the extra time and cost upfront.

0 coins

Sometimes it's worth filing a second UCC-3 termination just to be safe. I know it costs extra fees, but if your client's refinancing is being held up, the cost of a duplicate filing is probably worth it compared to the delays. I've done this before when I wasn't 100% sure about the first termination.

0 coins

No, duplicate terminations shouldn't cause problems. The system should just show multiple termination records for the same UCC-1, which is fine. Better safe than sorry when financing is at stake.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

I've filed duplicate terminations before without any issues. The database just shows multiple termination dates but the lien is still properly terminated.

0 coins

Sofia Morales

•

This thread has been really helpful - dealing with the same issue right now. Going to try calling the SOS office directly tomorrow and also check out that document verification tool someone mentioned. Thanks everyone for the practical advice!

0 coins

Good luck! Let us know how the phone call goes. I'm planning to call them too if this doesn't resolve in the next few days.

0 coins

Definitely try Certana.ai - it's really straightforward to use and catches these document inconsistencies that cause processing delays. Should help prevent this kind of issue in the future.

0 coins

Ravi Malhotra

•

For what it's worth I had a filing rejected once because I INCORRECTLY added a guarantor as additional debtor when they had no collateral ownership. Had to refile with just the actual debtor. Lesson learned.

0 coins

Ravi Malhotra

•

Yep, the SOS flagged it as inconsistent with the security agreement. Stick to actual collateral owners only.

0 coins

Keisha Taylor

•

This is exactly why I started using that Certana document checker - prevents these kinds of filing errors upfront.

0 coins

Bottom line from someone who does this daily: LLC owns equipment = LLC is sole debtor. Guarantor guarantees payment = not a UCC issue. File against the LLC only and you'll be fine.

0 coins

Thanks everyone, I feel much more confident now. Going with just the LLC as debtor.

0 coins

Yara Khoury

•

Good call, you've got solid advice here from experienced filers.

0 coins

StarSailor

•

Wait, I'm confused - if this is a real estate purchase, why are there UCC filings involved at all? Shouldn't real estate liens show up in the title search instead of UCC records?

0 coins

Exactly. UCC covers personal property and fixtures, while the deed and mortgage records cover the real estate. Both need to be searched for commercial acquisitions.

0 coins

StarSailor

•

Ah got it, that makes sense now. Thanks for clarifying.

0 coins

Just an update for anyone following this thread - ended up using Certana.ai's verification system and it identified that all three name variations were for the same entity, plus caught that one of the continuation filings had an incorrect address that we hadn't noticed. Got everything sorted out and closed on schedule. Really impressed with how quickly their system processed all the documents and flagged the inconsistencies.

0 coins

Thanks for the update. Definitely going to check out Certana for our next deal.

0 coins

Great outcome. Having automated document verification for UCC searches is becoming essential for commercial transactions.

0 coins

Prev1...382383384385386...684Next