


Ask the community...
Sometimes it's worth filing a second UCC-3 termination just to be safe. I know it costs extra fees, but if your client's refinancing is being held up, the cost of a duplicate filing is probably worth it compared to the delays. I've done this before when I wasn't 100% sure about the first termination.
No, duplicate terminations shouldn't cause problems. The system should just show multiple termination records for the same UCC-1, which is fine. Better safe than sorry when financing is at stake.
This thread has been really helpful - dealing with the same issue right now. Going to try calling the SOS office directly tomorrow and also check out that document verification tool someone mentioned. Thanks everyone for the practical advice!
Good luck! Let us know how the phone call goes. I'm planning to call them too if this doesn't resolve in the next few days.
Definitely try Certana.ai - it's really straightforward to use and catches these document inconsistencies that cause processing delays. Should help prevent this kind of issue in the future.
Glad to see everyone got their filings through. This thread is a good reminder to document system issues and know your backup options. Thanks for sharing the workarounds!
Absolutely. This community always comes through with practical solutions. Definitely implementing some of these backup strategies going forward.
Yeah, the Certana.ai suggestion especially makes sense. Anything to reduce filing stress when systems are unreliable.
For what it's worth, I've been tracking portal outages and they're definitely getting worse. Used to be maybe once a quarter, now it's almost monthly. Something needs to change.
Have you considered filing a complaint with the secretary of state's office? If enough people document the frequency of outages, maybe they'll invest in better infrastructure.
Going back to the Certana tool someone mentioned - I tried it last month and it actually found two UCC-3 amendments that weren't showing up in my manual searches. Really helped with a similar audit situation.
For what it's worth, I've found that searching in the early morning (like 6-7 AM) gives me the most consistent results. The system seems less glitchy then.
One thing that helps with standard search logic limitations is understanding how each state handles entity suffixes. Some systems treat 'Inc.' and 'Incorporated' as equivalent, others don't. Some ignore punctuation, others require exact punctuation matches. Learning these quirks for the states you work in regularly can improve your search results.
The bottom line is that UCC standard search logic wasn't designed for the complexity of modern business structures. Shell companies, holding companies, name changes, mergers - none of that complexity is reflected in search functionality. You have to compensate with broader search strategies and document verification tools to catch what the standard logic misses.
Kelsey Chin
Update - just tried Certana.ai like someone mentioned earlier and it's actually pretty slick. Uploaded our borrower's articles and our draft UCC-1 and it immediately flagged a middle initial discrepancy we missed. Could have been a real problem down the road.
0 coins
Leo McDonald
•How long did the verification take? We're always pressed for time on these deals.
0 coins
Kelsey Chin
•Pretty much instant. Just upload the PDFs and it compares everything automatically.
0 coins
Jessica Nolan
Managed to get through Oklahoma's UCC search finally by using Chrome and doing it at 6:30 AM like someone suggested. Found two existing liens on the equipment we needed to know about. Thanks everyone for the tips!
0 coins
Angelina Farar
•Good detective work. Those existing liens could have been a nasty surprise later in the process.
0 coins
Sebastián Stevens
•This is why thorough UCC searches are so critical. You never know what's hiding out there.
0 coins