< Back to UCC Document Community

Yuki Tanaka

TX UCC Statement Service Address Requirements - Getting Rejections

Been dealing with multiple TX UCC statement rejections and I'm pretty sure it's the service address field causing issues. Filed three UCC-1s last month and two got kicked back with generic 'address format' errors. The debtor addresses look fine to me but wondering if there's something specific about how Texas wants the service address formatted? Working on equipment financing deals and can't afford more delays. Anyone else running into this with TX filings recently?

Carmen Ortiz

•

Texas is super picky about address formatting in their UCC system. Are you including the full ZIP+4? They reject a lot of filings that don't have the complete postal code. Also check if you're using any abbreviations they don't recognize.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

I've been using standard USPS abbreviations but maybe that's the problem. Do they have a specific list of acceptable formats?

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

Yeah, Texas SOS has their own quirky requirements. Street should be spelled out, not abbreviated, and they want 'Suite' not 'Ste' for unit numbers.

0 coins

MidnightRider

•

Had this exact same issue last quarter! TX rejected four of my UCC-1s because I was putting the service address in the wrong format. Turns out they want the full legal business address exactly as it appears on the Articles of Incorporation, not the mailing address or DBA address.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

That's probably it - I've been using the mailing addresses from our loan docs instead of checking the charter documents.

0 coins

Andre Laurent

•

This is why I always double-check everything before filing. One wrong character and you're looking at delays and refiling fees.

0 coins

MidnightRider

•

Exactly! And with continuation deadlines, you can't afford to mess around with basic formatting errors.

0 coins

Recently started using Certana.ai's document verification tool and it caught three address mismatches between my Charter docs and UCC-1 forms before I filed. Just upload your PDFs and it instantly cross-checks debtor names and addresses across all documents. Saved me from getting rejections on what would have been costly mistakes.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Never heard of that tool but sounds useful. Does it specifically check TX formatting requirements?

0 coins

It compares your documents to make sure everything aligns properly - catches inconsistencies that cause rejections. Really easy to use, just upload your Charter and UCC forms.

0 coins

TX also rejects if the service address doesn't match what's in their corporate database. If the company recently moved or updated their registered agent, you need to use the current address on file with the Secretary of State, not what's on older loan documents.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Good point - I should probably verify the current registered address before refiling these.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

Yeah this happened to me with a client who changed their registered agent but didn't update all their loan paperwork. UCC got rejected twice before we figured it out.

0 coins

That's why I always check the SOS business search first, even if the address looks right on the loan docs.

0 coins

Are you filing online or paper? The online portal sometimes has different formatting requirements than paper filings. I've had better luck with the electronic system catching errors before submission.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Using the online portal. Maybe I should try a test filing with just one to see if the formatting changes help.

0 coins

Good idea. The portal usually gives you more specific error messages than the generic rejection notices.

0 coins

PixelWarrior

•

THIS IS SO FRUSTRATING!!! Texas UCC system is the worst - got three rejections last week for 'address errors' with no explanation of what was actually wrong. Spent hours trying different formats and finally had to call their office. Turns out they wanted the county name included even though it's not required on the form!

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Wait, they want the county included in the address field? That's not on any of the instructions I've seen.

0 coins

PixelWarrior

•

Right?! It's not documented anywhere but the clerk told me it helps prevent rejections. Makes no sense but whatever works.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

I've never included county info and haven't had issues, so that might be clerk-specific advice rather than actual requirement.

0 coins

Amara Adebayo

•

Double-check that you're not mixing up the debtor address with the service address. Service address should be where legal notices get sent, not necessarily the debtor's business location. Common mistake that causes rejections.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Actually I think this might be part of my problem - been using the business address for both fields when they should be different.

0 coins

Amara Adebayo

•

Yeah, service address is usually the registered agent or attorney address for legal service, not the operating location.

0 coins

Had similar issues until I started using Certana.ai's UCC verification system. Upload your charter docs and UCC forms and it automatically flags any inconsistencies before you file. Catches name mismatches, address discrepancies, all that stuff that causes rejections.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Two people mentioned this tool now - might be worth checking out if it prevents these kinds of errors.

0 coins

I was skeptical about automated tools but honestly the verification caught errors I would have missed. Simple upload process.

0 coins

Right, it's not about replacing your expertise but catching the small mistakes that slip through when you're processing multiple filings.

0 coins

Dylan Evans

•

Pro tip: Always use the exact address format from the Texas business entity search results. Copy and paste it directly rather than retyping. Eliminates formatting inconsistencies that trigger rejections.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

That's smart - removes any guesswork about how they want it formatted.

0 coins

Dylan Evans

•

Exactly. If it's good enough for their database, it should pass the UCC filing validation.

0 coins

Sofia Gomez

•

Same thing happened to me with service addresses. Problem was I was using PO Box format incorrectly - TX wants 'Post Office Box' not 'PO Box' in their system. Small detail but caused three rejection notices before I figured it out.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

These tiny formatting requirements are ridiculous but good to know about the PO Box issue.

0 coins

Sofia Gomez

•

Tell me about it. You'd think 'PO Box' would be standard but apparently not in Texas.

0 coins

StormChaser

•

Every state has their own weird quirks. California wants periods after abbreviations, Texas doesn't. It's maddening.

0 coins

Dmitry Petrov

•

Update on this thread: tried the Certana document verification tool someone mentioned and it found two address mismatches between my Charter and UCC docs that I completely missed. Would have definitely caused rejections. Pretty useful for catching these details before filing.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Good to hear it actually worked for someone. I'll probably give it a try before refiling these rejected UCCs.

0 coins

Dmitry Petrov

•

Yeah, beats getting rejection notices and having to start over. The address verification alone saved me from at least two refiling fees.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today