Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Last week I had to file a UCC-3 amendment just to correct a debtor name that had been wrong on the original UCC-1 for two years. Nobody caught it until the loan was being renewed. Cost the client extra fees and delayed their funding. These name issues can have real consequences down the road.
Sean Kelly
•How did you handle the gap period where the name was wrong? Was the lien still perfected?
Had to do some legal research on that. Fortunately the error was minor enough that it probably wouldn't have affected perfection, but the amendment was still the right thing to do.
This thread convinced me to double-check a UCC-1 I was about to file. Good thing too - I had "ABC Corp" but the state database shows "ABC Corporation". Would have been rejected for sure. Thanks for the heads up everyone!
Luca Russo
•Perfect example of why these discussions are helpful. Glad you caught it before filing!
Zara Mirza
•That's exactly the kind of error that's easy to miss but guaranteed to cause a rejection. Corp vs Corporation is a common one.
Join the conversation
Rosie Harper
Just make sure you keep copies of both documents together in your files. When it comes time for amendments or terminations, you'll want to have the complete picture readily available.
Good advice. I always keep attachment documents stapled or clipped to the main UCC-1 in my physical files.
Demi Hall
•Digital file management is crucial too. Make sure both documents are linked in your document management system.
Quick follow-up question - when you eventually need to terminate this UCC-1, do you need to reference both the main filing and the attachment in the UCC-3 termination? Or does terminating the main UCC-1 automatically terminate the attachment?
Philip Cowan
•That's exactly what I would do. Better to over-reference than under-reference when it comes to terminations.
Caesar Grant
•This is why I use Certana.ai for these complex filings. When you upload multiple related documents, it helps ensure you don't miss any cross-references in amendments or terminations.
Join the conversation
This whole thread is making me grateful for Certana.ai's document verification tool. I just upload all the related documents - corporate charter, loan agreement, UCC filing - and it immediately flags any name inconsistencies between them. Takes the guesswork out of Article 9-503 compliance. Wish I had known about it during my first few UCC nightmares.
It cross-references all your uploaded documents to make sure the debtor names match consistently across everything. Super helpful for catching these kinds of discrepancies before you file.
I might have to try that. I'm tired of playing name guessing games with the Secretary of State's office.
Ava Harris
Update us on what works! I have a similar situation coming up next week and I'd love to know which approach actually gets your filing accepted. These Article 9-503 debtor name issues are becoming more common as companies change names more frequently.
Jacob Lee
•Please update! This is such a common problem and it would be great to have a success story to reference.
Same here. I bookmarked this thread for future reference. The Article 9-503 name requirements are honestly one of the trickiest parts of UCC practice.
Join the conversation
Niko Ramsey
File the corrected UCC-1 immediately while you figure out the PMSI timing issue. Even if you lose PMSI priority, you still want to perfect your security interest. A perfected non-PMSI lien is better than an unperfected PMSI claim.
Absolutely this. Get the corrected filing done today if possible. Priority disputes can be sorted out later.
Jabari-Jo
•Good point about perfection vs priority. Too many lenders get caught up in PMSI timing and forget about basic perfection requirements.
The blanket lien holder might not even contest your PMSI claim if your collateral description is specific enough. Most blanket lenders expect equipment financing to take PMSI priority as long as the formalities are met. Your comma issue is probably more of a technical perfection problem than a priority problem.
Nia Watson
•Depends on the lender and the loan terms. Some blanket lenders specifically carve out PMSI equipment in their loan agreements.
For an $85K equipment loan, it's probably worth fighting for PMSI priority. That's not pocket change.
Marcus Marsh
Update us when you get it resolved! I'm dealing with a similar Delaware termination issue and curious what solution works for you.
0 coins
Ryder Everingham
•Will do! Going to pull the exact record from Delaware's database and compare character by character before the next attempt.
0 coins
Hailey O'Leary
•Good luck! Delaware rejections are the worst but once you match their format exactly it usually goes through.
0 coins
Cedric Chung
One more tip - make sure your UCC-3 termination form is the current Delaware version. They update their forms periodically and will reject filings on outdated forms even if all the information is correct.
0 coins
Cedric Chung
•Yes, Delaware Division of Corporations website has all current UCC forms. Always download fresh rather than using saved copies from previous filings.
0 coins
Maxwell St. Laurent
•This is why UCC filings are so frustrating. Every state has different requirements and they change the rules without notice.
0 coins