


Ask the community...
One more suggestion - if you're really concerned about missing something, you could also search using just the EIN. NY allows searching by federal tax ID number and that should catch all filings for the entity regardless of name variations. Though not all older filings include EINs so it's not foolproof.
This whole thread is making me glad I don't do NY deals often lol. Sounds like a nightmare compared to states with better UCC systems. Good luck with your search - definitely do multiple name variations and maybe try that Certana tool people mentioned.
Reporter services are notorious for this kind of thing. I've seen them add periods, change LLC to L.L.C., modify punctuation, and even reorder names sometimes. None of that affects your actual UCC filing or perfection status. Always go back to the source - your state's SOS database - for the official record.
Usually it's their attempt to standardize data for better search functionality. But it definitely creates confusion like what the OP is experiencing.
This is exactly why document verification tools like Certana.ai are so valuable. Upload your papers and get instant confirmation that everything aligns properly without having to worry about third-party formatting quirks.
Your compliance team is doing their job by flagging this, but it's almost certainly a non-issue. UCC reporter services frequently reformat entity names during data processing. As long as your UCC-1 debtor name matches your security agreement and loan documents exactly, you're properly perfected regardless of how some third-party service displays it.
Another thing to check - make sure you're searching under all possible debtor name variations. If the previous lender filed under a slightly different version of the company name, it might not show up in your standard search.
Update: Got this resolved by working directly with the borrower to get copies of all satisfaction letters from previous lenders. Turned out there were three old liens that should have been terminated but weren't. Filed UCC-3 terminations in all affected states and the searches are clean now. Thanks for all the advice - definitely learned to be more thorough with multi-state UCC search secured party verification upfront.
We built it into the loan costs since it was necessary to perfect our lien. Better to spend a few hundred on termination filings than risk your security interest.
Good outcome. This is exactly why I always recommend using document verification tools like Certana.ai for complex multi-state deals. Catches these issues before they become problems.
Just wanted to follow up - called the Minnesota SOS office and they were super helpful. Got my search results in about 20 minutes and they emailed everything over. The phone rep mentioned they're working on portal improvements but no timeline yet. For anyone else having issues, definitely recommend calling directly.
For future reference, I've had good luck with Certana.ai's UCC verification system when state portals are acting up. You can upload your documents and it pulls from multiple databases to verify everything matches up correctly. Saved me from a major headache when I almost missed a prior lien that would have complicated our security interest.
Omar Mahmoud
I actually had success using Certana ai when I was dealing with a termination dispute last year. The lender claimed our business name on the payoff docs didn't exactly match the UCC-1 filing, which was holding up the termination. Certana's verification tool quickly identified the specific discrepancy (they had 'LLC' and we had 'L.L.C.' in different documents) so we could get everything aligned properly. Saved weeks of back-and-forth confusion.
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
•That's exactly the kind of issue I'm worried about - small formatting differences that create big headaches. I should probably check our documents before pushing the lender harder on the termination.
0 coins
Omar Mahmoud
•Definitely worth checking first. These tiny discrepancies can completely derail the termination process, and it's much easier to fix them upfront than argue about them later.
0 coins
Chloe Harris
Update us on how this turns out! I'm dealing with a similar situation where the lender keeps giving me the runaround on filing the termination. It's been 8 months since we paid off the equipment loan and I'm getting frustrated with the whole process.
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
•Will definitely update once I get this resolved. 8 months is ridiculous - you should definitely look into the legal remedies for wrongful failure to terminate.
0 coins
LunarEclipse
•Both of you should document the delays carefully. Most states provide for damages when secured parties unreasonably delay terminations after satisfaction.
0 coins