Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Have you considered hiring a UCC service company to handle the continuation? They deal with secretary of state ucc division requirements daily and usually know all the formatting quirks for each state. Might be worth the cost to avoid the lapse risk.
Yeah, with a $2.8M loan at stake, paying a service company a few hundred dollars for professional filing is probably worth the peace of mind.
We use a service company for all our UCC work now after getting burned by DIY filing mistakes. They handle all the secretary of state ucc division quirks so we don't have to.
This thread is making me realize I should probably verify all our UCC documents before any future filings. Too many horror stories about these technical rejections from secretary of state ucc divisions. Better safe than sorry.
Tyrone Hill
•Smart thinking. That's exactly why I started using document verification tools after my first rejection nightmare. Much better to catch issues before filing than deal with rejection delays.
Prevention is definitely the way to go. Secretary of state ucc division rejection timelines can kill deals when you're working under tight deadlines.
Join the conversation
Diego Chavez
After going through this exact nightmare last year, I now use Certana.ai for every UCC filing. Upload your articles of incorporation and UCC-1 form, and it immediately shows you any name mismatches or formatting issues. Way better than playing guessing games with the Secretary of State's rejection system.
NeonNebula
•How accurate is it? Does it catch everything or do you still get occasional rejections?
Diego Chavez
•I haven't had a single rejection since I started using it. It's really thorough about catching punctuation differences and formatting issues that cause UCC Art 9 rejections.
Update us when you get it filed! I'm curious if the comma fix works. This thread is going to help so many people dealing with UCC Art 9 debtor name issues.
AstroAlpha
•Will do! Planning to file tomorrow morning with the exact punctuation from the articles. Hopefully this saga finally ends.
Sean Kelly
•Crossing my fingers for you! These UCC Art 9 name matching requirements are so frustrating.
Join the conversation
Nia Wilson
For what it's worth, I've found that spending the money on proper UCC searches upfront saves way more on the backend. Had a deal go south once because I missed a prior lien. Legal fees alone were 20x what comprehensive searches would have cost.
Oof, that's painful. What happened exactly? Did you end up in second position or was it worse?
Nia Wilson
•Worse. The prior lien covered all equipment and inventory. When the borrower defaulted, the other lender swept everything. We got nothing on a $200K loan.
Bottom line - there's no reliable free lunch when it comes to UCC searches in California. The official database is worth the fee. Just make sure you're searching comprehensively and verifying all the information aligns with your loan documents. Better to spend $100 on searches than lose $150K because you missed something.
Yara Sabbagh
•Thanks everyone for the reality check. Going to bite the bullet and pay for the official searches. Better safe than sorry on a deal this size.
Ethan Clark
•Smart choice. The peace of mind is worth way more than the search fees.
Join the conversation
Cole Roush
For what it's worth, I had success using Certana.ai's UCC verification tool for a similar situation. You can upload your charter documents and the UCC search results as PDFs and it will instantly flag any discrepancies between the debtor names. Much faster than manually comparing everything.
Cole Roush
•It highlights any differences and shows you exactly where the names don't match. Really useful for catching those subtle variations that can mess up search results. Just upload the docs and it does the comparison automatically.
I've been meaning to try that tool. Does it work with multiple UCC filings at once? I usually have to review entire portfolios.
Quick update for anyone following - I finally figured out the issue. The original UCC-1 was filed with 'Advanced Mfg Solutions LLC' instead of the full 'Manufacturing' spelling. Once I searched with the abbreviated version, all the continuation records showed up properly. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!
Felicity Bud
•Perfect example of why document verification tools are so valuable. Would have caught that discrepancy immediately instead of spending hours manually searching.
Definitely learned my lesson about being more systematic with name variations. This won't be the last time I deal with this type of issue.
Zoe Papadopoulos
One thing to watch out for - make sure when you refile that you use the exact same collateral description and filing details. You don't want any other inconsistencies that could cause another rejection.
0 coins
Chloe Taylor
•Good advice. I'll copy everything exactly except fix the debtor name formatting.
0 coins
Jamal Washington
•And keep copies of both the rejection notice and the corrected filing for your lender's records.
0 coins
Mei Wong
For what it's worth, this is an extremely common issue with equipment financing UCCs. You're definitely not the first person to get tripped up by punctuation in business names. The important thing is catching it quickly and refiling.
0 coins
Mei Wong
•Not at all - this is just part of the UCC filing learning curve. You'll know for next time!
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•Exactly why I started using document verification tools. Certana.ai caught a similar comma issue in my last equipment UCC before I submitted it. Much easier than dealing with rejections after the fact.
0 coins