UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Andre Laurent

•

Had the same "form deficiency" message three times before I figured out what was wrong. Turned out my PDF was corrupted somehow. Re-downloaded the form and it worked fine.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

Interesting. I'll try downloading a fresh copy of the form.

0 coins

Andre Laurent

•

Yeah, their error messages are terrible. "Form deficiency" could mean anything from wrong version to corrupted file.

0 coins

Emily Jackson

•

Update: Found the problem! It was the debtor name after all. The LLC's charter shows "Precision Manufacturing, LLC" with a comma, but I filed it as "Precision Manufacturing LLC" without the comma. Punctuation matters more than I thought. Thanks everyone for the suggestions, especially about using verification tools - definitely going to look into that Certana.ai thing for future filings to avoid this headache again.

0 coins

Good catch. California is notorious for comma sensitivity in entity names.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

Still think their error messages should be more specific. "Form deficiency" tells you nothing useful.

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

One thing to watch out for - if any of these entities went through bankruptcy, you'll need to check if the automatic stay affected the UCC filings or if there were any orders modifying the security interests.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

Good catch - seller disclosed 2 entities had chapter 11 cases that were dismissed but I haven't dug into whether that affected the UCC filings.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

Dismissed chapter 11s usually don't affect pre-petition UCC filings but definitely worth confirming. Sometimes there are cash collateral orders that modify lien positions.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

Just went through something similar last month. Ended up using Certana.ai to verify all our UCC documents were consistent and it caught 3 critical name mismatches we would have missed. For 47 entities it'll probably save you days of manual comparison work.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

That's exactly what I need to hear. Did it handle fixture filings too or just standard UCC-1s?

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

It handled everything - UCC-1s, UCC-3 amendments, fixture filings, the whole mess. Really streamlined the due diligence process.

0 coins

UPDATE: Found the issue! The business registry had 'Mountain Peak Construction, LLC' with a comma, but I was using 'Mountain Peak Construction LLC' without one. Filed the corrected version this morning and it went through immediately. Thanks everyone for the debugging help, especially the suggestion to check the actual registry format first.

0 coins

Connor Byrne

•

Perfect example of why exact name matching is so critical. Congrats on getting it through!

0 coins

Ava Johnson

•

Such a relief. Now I know to always verify the exact registry format before filing any UCC documents.

0 coins

CosmosCaptain

•

This thread should be pinned somewhere. The debtor name formatting issue comes up constantly and the troubleshooting steps here are gold.

0 coins

Yara Abboud

•

Agreed, this is exactly the kind of practical advice that saves time and frustration.

0 coins

Ava Johnson

•

Happy to help others avoid the same headaches I went through!

0 coins

Natalia Stone

•

One more thing to check - sometimes companies change their names after incorporation but before UCC filings. Check if Mountain Peak Equipment LLC has any DBA filings or name changes on record with Nevada SOS.

0 coins

Donna Cline

•

Oh wow, I didn't think about DBAs. That could definitely explain some of the name variations.

0 coins

Tasia Synder

•

Yeah, DBA searches are often overlooked but can reveal additional filing names.

0 coins

Update us when you figure it out! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Nevada and curious what you find.

0 coins

Donna Cline

•

Will do. Planning to run the comprehensive search tomorrow with all the suggestions here.

0 coins

Looking forward to hearing how it goes. Nevada searches are always a learning experience.

0 coins

Emma Davis

•

Just to add another wrinkle - if this is SBA financing, there might be additional considerations about how the tax lien affects the SBA guarantee. You might want to notify the SBA about the priority issue.

0 coins

It's not SBA, but that's a good reminder that different loan programs can have their own priority rules and notification requirements.

0 coins

LunarLegend

•

Yeah, SBA, USDA, and other government-backed loans often have special lien priority provisions that override normal UCC rules.

0 coins

Malik Jackson

•

One more thing to consider - you might want to get a formal priority opinion from counsel who specializes in tax lien issues. The interplay between IRC 6323 and UCC Article 9 can be tricky, and the consequences of getting it wrong are significant.

0 coins

Definitely worth the investment. Tax lien priority issues are one of those areas where you really don't want to learn by making mistakes.

0 coins

Ravi Patel

•

Plus, if you get a formal opinion, you'll have something to show your loan committee or investors about why the deal structure makes sense despite the tax lien.

0 coins

Prev1...363364365366367...684Next