Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Rudy Cenizo
The Illinois Secretary of State UCC search portal goes down for maintenance every few weeks without much notice. Check their website homepage for any system alerts before spending too much time troubleshooting. If there's scheduled maintenance, you're out of luck until it's done.
Didn't think to check for maintenance notices. That could definitely explain the issues I'm having.
Natalie Khan
•They really should send email alerts when the system goes down. Would save everyone a lot of time.
Daryl Bright
UPDATE: Just tried the Illinois SOS UCC search again and it's working normally now. Must have been a temporary system issue. Was able to pull up all the filings I needed. Thanks everyone for the troubleshooting tips - I'll definitely keep Certana.ai bookmarked for future document verification needs.
Perfect timing that it came back online before your closing deadline!
Great news! Definitely keep that Certana.ai tool handy for when you need to double-check document consistency in the future.
Join the conversation
NebulaNova
Whatever you do, don't just resubmit the same description. I made that mistake once and they rejected it again with a nastier letter the second time around.
Smart move. Always better to over-describe than under-describe with general intangibles.
NebulaNova
•Exactly. Rejection letters don't get friendlier with repeat filings.
Paolo Conti
Been dealing with this issue all week on a different deal. Ended up going with 'all general intangibles including but not limited to: (a) intellectual property rights including patents, patent applications, trademarks, trademark applications, copyrights, trade secrets and know-how; (b) customer lists, customer information and databases; (c) contracts, contract rights and accounts receivable; (d) goodwill and business records.' Seems to satisfy most filing offices.
Paolo Conti
•Go for it. Just make sure it matches what's actually in your security agreement. That's the key part.
Amina Diallo
•This is exactly the kind of detailed description that works. Generic 'general intangibles' just doesn't cut it anymore.
Join the conversation
Connor Byrne
For what it's worth, I've had better luck with CT Corporation's search service than CSC lately. Their data seems more current, especially for Texas and California filings.
Yara Abboud
•Good to know. Might be worth getting quotes from multiple search providers and rotating between them.
PixelPioneer
•The problem is switching providers mid-deal can create consistency issues. Better to stick with one but verify the critical results.
Update: Reached out to CSC and they confirmed there was a data sync issue with Texas filings from mid-December. They're working on updating their database but it could take another week. In the meantime they recommended verifying Texas searches directly with the SOS database.
Amina Sy
•This is exactly why I always keep backup verification methods. Can't rely on any single source completely.
Appreciate everyone's input on this. Going to implement some of the verification procedures mentioned here to avoid future headaches.
Join the conversation
Ethan Taylor
One more thing to watch out for - make sure the debtor name on both documents matches exactly how your business is legally registered. Had a client whose security agreement used their DBA name but the UCC-1 used their legal entity name. Created a mess when we tried to verify the filing later.
Yuki Ito
•This is why I love Certana.ai's document checker. Would have caught that name mismatch immediately instead of discovering it months later during an audit.
Carmen Lopez
•Name consistency is huge. Seen UCC-1 filings get rejected because of minor variations in the debtor name from the security agreement.
Thanks everyone, this thread has been incredibly helpful! I feel much more confident going into Friday's closing now. The security agreement creates the lender's rights, the UCC-1 protects those rights publicly. Got it. Will definitely review both documents carefully to make sure everything matches up properly.
Good luck with your financing! Equipment loans can be great for growing a construction business when structured properly.
Jamal Wilson
•Definitely recommend having someone double-check the document consistency before you sign. Small mistakes can cause big problems later.
Madison Tipne
I actually had a client situation where understanding these article reference differences became crucial during a bankruptcy proceeding. The trustee questioned our perfection because our security agreement referenced Article 9A while our UCC-1 just said Article 9. We ended up using Certana.ai to generate a comprehensive document comparison report that showed the consistent secured transaction framework across all our filings, which satisfied the court that our lien was properly perfected despite the reference numbering differences.
0 coins
Hugo Kass
•Bankruptcy trustees love to challenge perfection on technical grounds. Having documentation that shows everything aligns properly is crucial.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•The verification report was key to resolving the dispute quickly. Without it, we might have faced an expensive legal battle over what was ultimately just a numbering system difference.
0 coins
Holly Lascelles
Thanks everyone for the clarification on this. I was getting worried there were special Article 9A procedures I didn't know about, but it sounds like standard UCC filing practices apply regardless of the numbering system the state uses.
0 coins
Laila Fury
•You've got it. Focus on the core requirements - debtor name accuracy, proper collateral description, correct filing office - and you'll be fine.
0 coins
Hazel Garcia
•Agreed. This discussion has been really helpful for understanding that the substance doesn't change even when the reference numbers vary.
0 coins