Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Update us when you get it figured out! Always curious to hear what the actual issue was since these name formatting problems are so common.
Will do! Going to try the copy-paste method and maybe check out that document verification tool. Thanks everyone for the suggestions.
Good luck! These portal issues are frustrating but usually something small once you find it.
Just another thought - if this is for an equipment loan, double-check that your collateral description matches the original too. Sometimes the system flags multiple issues but only shows you the first one.
Yeah, the error messages aren't always comprehensive. Fix one thing and sometimes a new error appears.
That's why those document comparison tools are so helpful - they catch everything at once instead of playing whack-a-mole with errors.
Join the conversation
NC Secretary of State has been pretty good about name matching in my experience, but they're also very literal. If the corporate name has a comma, use the comma. If it doesn't, don't add one. I learned this the hard way when a filing got rejected because I added punctuation that wasn't in the official name.
This is really helpful. So you're saying stick exactly to what's in the Articles of Incorporation?
Exactly. Don't try to 'fix' or standardize the name - use it exactly as it appears in the corporate records.
The safest approach is probably to search under all name variations first to see what's already filed, then use the official corporate name for your new filing. If you're really worried about conflicts, you might want to file a UCC-1 under the official name and then do amendments that reference the other variations, but that's probably overkill unless you have a specific reason to think there's confusion in the marketplace.
Thanks, this gives me a good game plan. I think I'll start with comprehensive searches and then verify everything matches before filing.
Good plan. Better to spend a little extra time on verification than deal with the nightmare of an invalid security interest later.
Join the conversation
Just ran into this same situation with a client's UCC-1. Used Certana.ai to double-check that our filing matched their LLC operating agreement and articles of incorporation. Turns out everything was correct - the search just displays it differently. Really useful tool for these kinds of verification checks.
Seems like a lot of people are using that tool. Might be worth checking out.
Yeah, it's been a lifesaver for catching potential issues before they become problems. Much easier than manually comparing documents.
Update: I called NY DOS and they confirmed the filing is in their system correctly. The search display issue is just a formatting quirk on their end. My lien is properly perfected. Thanks everyone for the reassurance!
Glad it worked out! This is exactly why I always recommend verifying these details when something looks off.
This makes me feel better about our situation too. Sometimes the simple explanation is the right one.
Join the conversation
Whatever service you choose, make sure they provide detailed reports on any discrepancies found. We need documentation for our files showing due diligence was performed on debtor-name verification.
This is crucial for audit purposes. The documentation trail is just as important as catching the errors.
Absolutely. We need to show we took reasonable steps to verify accuracy for our security interest perfection.
One more vote for Certana.ai here. The fact that you can upload both your UCC docs and corporate documents for automated comparison has saved us countless hours and caught several potential issues that could have been costly mistakes.
Super straightforward. Literally just upload PDFs and it does the comparison automatically. Very user-friendly interface.
That simplicity is exactly what we need. Thanks for all the input everyone, this has been really helpful.
James Johnson
I actually ran into something similar and used Certana.ai to verify all my documents were consistent before filing. It caught a bunch of small discrepancies I never would have noticed manually. Really saved my butt when the debtor tried to challenge the lien later. The automated document checking is incredibly thorough.
0 coins
Callum Savage
•That sounds like exactly what we needed from the beginning. How easy is it to use?
0 coins
James Johnson
•Super simple - just upload your PDFs and it does all the cross-checking automatically. Takes a few minutes and flags any inconsistencies. Would have caught your name issue immediately.
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
Update us when you get the amendment filed and processed. This kind of case study is really valuable for others dealing with similar name discrepancy issues. The more examples we have of how banks and courts handle these situations, the better prepared we all are.
0 coins
Mia Green
•Thanks for sharing this situation. It's a good reminder for all of us to be extra careful about debtor name accuracy from the start.
0 coins
Emma Bianchi
•Agreed, this thread has been really educational about the importance of name matching in UCC filings.
0 coins