


Ask the community...
Just dealt with this exact issue on a client deal. After wasting two days on Delaware's broken searches, I used that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier. Uploaded our existing docs and it flagged a potential debtor name mismatch we would have missed. Saved the whole transaction.
Yeah definitely worth it for high-value deals. The automated cross-checking caught stuff our manual review missed.
Glad to hear someone else had success with it. The document verification really is more thorough than trying to piece together inconsistent search results.
Update: Called Delaware UCC office this morning and they confirmed they're having database issues. They said searches should be more reliable by end of week after they complete system maintenance.
Thanks for the update! At least we know it's a known issue on their end. I'll probably still use the backup verification methods people suggested here.
Another vote for being super careful with entity names. I had a client whose UCC got rejected because they were filed under a DBA name instead of the actual legal entity name. Took weeks to sort out because we had to figure out which entity actually owned the collateral.
Exactly. And sometimes the business operates under multiple DBAs which makes it even more confusing to figure out the right name to use.
Update for anyone following this thread - I used that Certana tool someone mentioned and it immediately flagged the period issue in the LLC name. Filed the UCC-3 amendment this morning and it was accepted within 2 hours. Crisis averted and closing is back on track. Thanks everyone for the help!
Great outcome. And good reminder that UCC-3 amendments usually process much faster than initial filings since they're just corrections to existing records.
OK so if this was PMSI financing and you perfected within 20 days of the debtor taking possession, you'd have super-priority over other creditors even if they filed first. October 28th to November 3rd is only 6 days, so you should be golden.
Yeah, PMSI gives you priority over earlier-filed general liens on the same collateral. Pretty powerful protection when done right.
This thread has been super educational. I need to review all my equipment financing to see what qualifies as PMSI.
Sounds like you actually have a stronger position than you initially thought. The combination of proper attachment through your 'hereafter acquired' language plus PMSI protection for that specific equipment should give you solid priority. Just make sure your UCC-1 filing was accurate and complete.
Thanks everyone for the input. I feel much better about our position now. Going to run that UCC search and maybe try the Certana verification tool just to be thorough.
Whatever you do, don't file the continuation until you're 100% certain of the filing number. I've seen cases where people filed against the wrong UCC record and the original lien lapsed because the continuation didn't properly extend it. With 45 days left, you have time to verify everything properly.
45 days is plenty of time to get this sorted properly. Don't rush and make a mistake.
Exactly. The consequences of filing against the wrong record are much worse than taking a few extra days to verify.
Just went through something similar with a Oregon debtor. The key is matching the exact filing number from your original UCC-1 to whatever continuation you file. I ended up using Certana.ai to double-check all my documents before filing - uploaded the original financing statement and my draft continuation to make sure everything matched perfectly. Gave me peace of mind that I wasn't making any name or number errors.
I'm seeing multiple mentions of this Certana service. Is it really that helpful for UCC verification?
Luca Romano
Don't forget about fixture filings if any of your equipment is attached to real estate. Those require special handling and might not show up in standard UCC searches. Could be important for your loan modification if real estate is involved.
0 coins
Luca Romano
•Fixture filings are usually recorded with the real estate records, not just the UCC records. You'd need to search both systems to get the complete picture.
0 coins
Nia Jackson
•Good catch on fixtures. Many people forget about those but they can be critical for secured lending on manufacturing equipment.
0 coins
NebulaNova
Update: I ended up using a combination approach. Got quotes from three different UCC services and used Certana.ai to verify our existing documents first. Found two issues - a debtor name inconsistency and a missing continuation that we need to address. The document verification tool was really helpful for catching problems before we submitted anything to the lender. Still working on getting the certified copies but at least now I know exactly what we're dealing with.
0 coins
Malik Davis
•That's exactly why I like using document verification tools. They catch the little details that can cause big problems later.
0 coins
GalaxyGazer
•Thanks everyone for all the advice. This thread has been incredibly helpful in navigating this process.
0 coins