


Ask the community...
Just curious - are these all equipment loans with the same lender or different lenders? Sometimes lenders have their own preferences for how they want continuations handled even if the legal requirements are the same.
Ah that explains the inconsistency. Different loan officers probably had different preferences for describing the collateral. For continuations you should stick with however each original was described.
Bottom line - forget about UCC 1-308, that's not relevant here. For your continuations: match debtor names exactly, reference correct filing numbers, don't try to 'improve' the original collateral descriptions. Keep it simple and consistent with what was originally filed.
Ohio UCC foreclosure timeline reality check: Default triggers immediate repo rights, but actual repossession timing depends on collateral location, accessibility, and lender resources. Manufacturing equipment isn't as easy to repo as vehicles. Factor in scheduling repo companies, equipment transportation, and storage costs. You probably have 2-4 weeks before physical removal unless they're really motivated.
True about logistics. Heavy manufacturing equipment requires specialized transport and rigging.
Bottom line on UCC foreclosure timeline in Ohio: Legal right to repossess exists immediately upon default, but practical timeline is usually 2-6 weeks depending on equipment type and lender procedures. Sale notification must be given 10+ business days before disposition. Focus on negotiating forbearance rather than fighting the timeline - you'll have more success working with the lender than against them.
For what it's worth, I think you're probably fine on the comma issue, but definitely get that amendment filed. The bigger concern is whether there are OTHER discrepancies you haven't found yet. Have you compared addresses, collateral descriptions, all that stuff?
Sorry to add to your stress but better to find issues now. Check the debtor address against their current registered office, make sure collateral description matches your security agreement exactly.
Update us after you file the UCC-3 amendment! I'm curious how quickly it gets processed and whether it resolves your concerns about the UCC records discrepancy.
Will definitely update once I get this sorted out. Filing the amendment first thing tomorrow morning and hopefully this whole nightmare will be behind me soon.
Good luck! And don't beat yourself up too much about this - comma errors happen to everyone eventually. The important thing is catching it and fixing it quickly.
OK so if this was PMSI financing and you perfected within 20 days of the debtor taking possession, you'd have super-priority over other creditors even if they filed first. October 28th to November 3rd is only 6 days, so you should be golden.
Yeah, PMSI gives you priority over earlier-filed general liens on the same collateral. Pretty powerful protection when done right.
This thread has been super educational. I need to review all my equipment financing to see what qualifies as PMSI.
Sounds like you actually have a stronger position than you initially thought. The combination of proper attachment through your 'hereafter acquired' language plus PMSI protection for that specific equipment should give you solid priority. Just make sure your UCC-1 filing was accurate and complete.
Thanks everyone for the input. I feel much better about our position now. Going to run that UCC search and maybe try the Certana verification tool just to be thorough.
Yuki Ito
For equipment financing specifically, look for any existing liens on "machinery," "equipment," "fixtures," or broad categories like "inventory and equipment." Even if your equipment is specifically identified, broad existing liens might still have priority. Document everything you find so you can discuss priority and subordination with your legal team.
0 coins
Luca Romano
•This is why I always run searches well before closing. Gives you time to negotiate subordination agreements if needed.
0 coins
StarStrider
•That's smart. I'm doing this search about 3 weeks before our expected closing, hopefully that's enough time to sort out any issues.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
Just ran into this exact situation last week. Found three existing UCC-1s against our borrower with overlapping equipment descriptions. Ended up using Certana.ai to verify which specific pieces of equipment were actually covered by each filing. The automated analysis showed that two of the liens had been partially terminated but the search results weren't clear about which equipment was released. Saved us from a major priority dispute.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•How long did it take to get the analysis back? We're usually working on tight deadlines.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
•Pretty much instant - just upload the search results and your proposed filing documents. Way faster than having lawyers review everything manually.
0 coins