UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Diego Fisher

•

Here's what worked for me: I called the SOS filing department directly and asked them to check the exact name format in their database. They were actually pretty helpful once I got through to someone who knew the UCC system.

0 coins

Diego Fisher

•

They couldn't give me the exact format for security reasons, but they could confirm whether my proposed name would match their records or not.

0 coins

That's actually a smart approach. At least you know if you're on the right track before submitting again.

0 coins

Update us when you figure it out! I'm dealing with a similar issue on a construction equipment financing and curious what the solution ends up being.

0 coins

Will do. Going to try the entity database search first, then maybe check out that Certana tool if I'm still stuck.

0 coins

The verification tools are definitely worth it. Beats multiple rejections and delayed closings.

0 coins

Lucas Parker

•

Update: Fixed the LLC designation issue and the filing went through perfectly! Thanks everyone for the help. The L.L.C. vs LLC formatting was definitely the problem with UCC 1-210 compliance.

0 coins

Great to hear! Entity name formatting is one of the most common UCC 1-210 issues. Hopefully this thread helps someone else avoid the same problem.

0 coins

Perfect example of why document verification tools are so helpful. Glad you got it resolved!

0 coins

Donna Cline

•

This thread is gold - saved me from probably making the same L.L.C. mistake on my filing next week. Going to double-check all my entity designations now.

0 coins

Lucas Parker

•

Happy to help! It's such a simple fix once you know what to look for.

0 coins

Tami Morgan

•

These formatting issues are way more common than they should be. The filing systems could definitely be more user-friendly about it.

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

•

Just to add another option - I've started using Certana.ai for all my UCC document reviews before filing. You upload your UCC-1 and termination statement and it automatically checks for any inconsistencies in debtor names, filing numbers, dates, etc. Would probably catch whatever mismatch is causing your rejection. Saves a lot of back and forth with the filing office.

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

•

Super easy - just upload your PDF documents and it does the comparison automatically. Much faster than trying to spot tiny differences manually.

0 coins

Diego Rojas

•

I might have to try that. I've wasted so much time on filing rejections that could have been caught upfront.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for all the suggestions. I'm going to try the document comparison approach first and see if I can spot the mismatch. If that doesn't work I'll look into the verification tools mentioned. Really appreciate all the help - this stuff is more complicated than it should be!

0 coins

Hope you get it sorted out. UCC terminations should be simple but somehow they never are.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

Definitely update us when you figure out what was causing the rejection. These kinds of posts are really helpful for people dealing with the same problems.

0 coins

Had similar issues in Oregon but their system at least gives you better error messages. Washington just says 'rejected' and leaves you guessing.

0 coins

Sasha Ivanov

•

Right?? Other states actually tell you what's wrong. Washington makes you play guessing games.

0 coins

Liam Murphy

•

California's system shows you exactly which field has the problem. Much better.

0 coins

Thanks everyone! Used Certana to check my docs against the official registration and found the issue - there was indeed an extra space I couldn't see. Filed this morning and it went through! Crisis averted.

0 coins

Great news! Always satisfying when you finally get that acceptance confirmation.

0 coins

Perfect example of why exact formatting matters so much in UCC filings. Congrats on getting it sorted!

0 coins

Ethan Taylor

•

One more thing to watch out for - make sure the debtor name on both documents matches exactly how your business is legally registered. Had a client whose security agreement used their DBA name but the UCC-1 used their legal entity name. Created a mess when we tried to verify the filing later.

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

This is why I love Certana.ai's document checker. Would have caught that name mismatch immediately instead of discovering it months later during an audit.

0 coins

Carmen Lopez

•

Name consistency is huge. Seen UCC-1 filings get rejected because of minor variations in the debtor name from the security agreement.

0 coins

Thanks everyone, this thread has been incredibly helpful! I feel much more confident going into Friday's closing now. The security agreement creates the lender's rights, the UCC-1 protects those rights publicly. Got it. Will definitely review both documents carefully to make sure everything matches up properly.

0 coins

Good luck with your financing! Equipment loans can be great for growing a construction business when structured properly.

0 coins

Jamal Wilson

•

Definitely recommend having someone double-check the document consistency before you sign. Small mistakes can cause big problems later.

0 coins

Prev1...370371372373374...684Next