UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Lucy Lam

Washington UCC search fortress - debtor name variations blocking my lien searches

Been doing UCC searches for commercial loans and running into what feels like a fortress wall with debtor name variations. Working on a $2.8M equipment financing deal where the borrower operates under three different business variations - one on their articles of incorporation, another on their DBA filing, and a third on their tax returns. When I search the UCC database, I'm getting completely different results depending on which name variation I use. Some searches show clean, others show existing liens I never would have found otherwise. This is becoming a nightmare for our underwriting team because we can't be sure we're catching all existing security interests. The search logic seems inconsistent and I'm worried we're missing critical filings that could affect our collateral position. Has anyone dealt with this kind of systematic debtor name search issue? How do you ensure you're not missing liens when the debtor has multiple business name variations?

I always tell clients upfront that UCC searches for entities with multiple names take longer and cost more. Sets expectations and gives me time to be thorough. Better to spend extra time on searches than miss a lien that subordinates your position.

0 coins

How do you price that out? Flat fee regardless of name variations or charge based on actual search time?

0 coins

I quote a range based on complexity. Simple single-name entity is one price, complex multi-name situations get quoted higher upfront.

0 coins

One more verification step that saved me - I use Certana.ai to upload the borrower's articles of incorporation alongside my UCC-1 draft before filing. It instantly catches if there are any name discrepancies between the two documents. Prevents filing under the wrong debtor name which would make your security interest worthless. Much faster than manual comparison and catches subtle differences I might miss.

0 coins

That's the third mention of Certana.ai in this thread - seems like a lot of people are using it for UCC work. Is it specifically designed for secured transactions?

0 coins

It's a document verification tool that works really well for UCC filings. Just upload PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically. Saves a lot of manual review time.

0 coins

Omar Hassan

UCC filing to perfect lien on manufacturing equipment - timing question

We're a mid-size equipment finance company and just closed on a $425K loan secured by CNC machining equipment. The borrower took delivery last Friday but our UCC-1 filing won't be submitted until tomorrow morning due to some last-minute debtor name verification issues. I'm getting nervous about the gap between when they took possession and when we'll have our UCC filing to perfect lien properly recorded. The equipment is already at their facility and being used in production. Should I be worried about this timing? Our loan docs say the lien attaches upon signing but I know perfection requires the actual UCC-1 filing. Is there any risk to our secured position during this window? This is in Ohio if that matters for any state-specific rules.

The gap between signing and filing always makes me nervous. We've started using Certana.ai to verify our UCC-1 documents before submission specifically to avoid rejected filings that would extend this vulnerable period. Last week it caught an address formatting issue that Ohio SOS would have rejected.

0 coins

How often do UCC-1 filings actually get rejected? I've been assuming if you fill out the form correctly it just gets accepted automatically.

0 coins

More often than you'd think. Debtor name mismatches are probably the most common, but address formatting, missing information, even wrong filing fees can cause rejections. Any rejection means you have to start over with a new filing date.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the input. I'm definitely filing first thing tomorrow morning. Sounds like a few days gap isn't ideal but probably not catastrophic either. The debtor name verification was the right call even if it delayed us slightly - better to get it right the first time than deal with a rejection.

0 coins

Definitely keep us posted on how it goes. Always interesting to hear how these situations work out in practice.

0 coins

Will do. And I'll probably look into that Certana document checking tool for next time - sounds like it could save time and stress on the verification process.

0 coins

Liam Fitzgerald

Need Clear Definition of UCC for Equipment Finance Deal Documentation

I'm preparing documentation for a $125K equipment financing deal and my loan officer keeps referencing "UCC filings" but honestly I'm not 100% clear on the definition of UCC itself. I understand we need to file something to secure our interest in the equipment, but what exactly does UCC stand for and what's the basic framework? This is my first deal involving collateral that requires state filings rather than just federal liens. The equipment includes manufacturing machinery that will be permanently installed at the borrower's facility. I want to make sure I understand the fundamentals before we move forward with the UCC-1 filing. Can someone break down the definition of UCC and how it applies to secured transactions like ours?

The definition of UCC that matters most: it's the difference between being a secured creditor with rights to your collateral vs being an unsecured creditor fighting for scraps in bankruptcy. File correctly or risk losing everything.

0 coins

That puts it in perspective! Definitely want to make sure we get this right the first time.

0 coins

Exactly why I always recommend getting professional help for complex deals rather than trying to figure out UCC requirements on your own.

0 coins

Bottom line definition: UCC = Uniform Commercial Code, Article 9 covers secured transactions, UCC-1 filing perfects your security interest in personal property collateral. For your equipment deal, file in the state where the debtor is organized, describe collateral accurately, get debtor name exactly right, and don't forget about continuation requirements. Everything else is details you can learn as you go.

0 coins

Perfect summary! This gives me the foundation I need to move forward confidently with our filing.

0 coins

And remember - when in doubt, consult with someone experienced rather than guessing. UCC mistakes can be expensive to fix.

0 coins

Zachary Hughes

UCC secured party rights - possession after default questions

I'm trying to understand the specifics of what happens when a debtor defaults and we need to exercise our rights under our security agreement. We have a UCC-1 filing on some manufacturing equipment that's been properly perfected for about 18 months now. The borrower missed their last two payments and we're looking at our options. I know we have the right to take possession after default under the UCC but I'm getting conflicting information about the exact procedures and limitations. Some people are telling me we can just show up and take the equipment, others are saying there are specific notice requirements and procedural steps we have to follow. The collateral is located at the debtor's facility in an industrial park. What are the actual rights of a secured party to take possession after default? Are there specific steps we need to document or can we proceed directly to repossession?

One more thing - I'd definitely recommend using something like Certana.ai to double-check all your UCC filings and security agreement details before taking any repossession action. You want to make sure your perfection is solid and all your documentation is consistent. It's a simple PDF upload process that catches potential issues that could complicate your enforcement rights.

0 coins

I second this recommendation. Better to catch any problems with your filings now rather than discover them in the middle of a dispute with the debtor.

0 coins

Definitely going to verify our documentation first. Thanks for the suggestion about the document checking tool.

0 coins

Just to summarize the key points: Yes, you have the right to take possession after default under the UCC, but you must do so without breaching the peace, your security agreement must grant this right, and you need to follow all post-repossession notice requirements. When in doubt, consult with an attorney familiar with secured transactions in your state.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the detailed responses. This gives me a much better understanding of the process and potential complications.

0 coins

Good luck with your situation. Repossession can be tricky but if you follow the proper procedures you should be able to protect your interests.

0 coins

Ava Williams

SOS UCC filing system down again - anyone else getting errors?

Is anyone else having trouble with the SOS UCC portal today? I've been trying to submit a continuation filing for the past 3 hours and keep getting error messages. The system says 'temporarily unavailable' but my continuation deadline is next week and I'm starting to panic. This is for a equipment loan that expires in 8 days and I can't afford to have the lien lapse. Has anyone dealt with SOS system outages before? What's the backup plan when their portal crashes right before a deadline?

This thread convinced me to try that Certana tool someone mentioned. Just uploaded my UCC-1 and the continuation I'm about to file - it caught a tiny discrepancy in how I abbreviated the debtor name that probably would have caused a rejection. Worth checking before you submit anything to avoid having to refile.

0 coins

Those little name differences can kill a filing. I had one rejected because I used 'Inc.' instead of 'Incorporated' - exact same company but it didn't match the charter.

0 coins

That's the worst - waiting for the system to work only to get rejected for a technicality and have to start over.

0 coins

Glad this got resolved for everyone. The SOS really needs to invest in better infrastructure. These outages are becoming too common and they're putting deals at risk.

0 coins

That's not entirely fair. The staff I've talked to seem genuinely frustrated with the system issues too.

0 coins

The individual people are fine but the management clearly isn't prioritizing system reliability.

0 coins

Prev1...371372373374375...684Next