UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This thread is really helpful. I'm dealing with a similar attachment timing issue on a smaller deal. The three-prong test explanation clarified a lot for me. Going to file our UCC-1 today instead of waiting until closing next month.

0 coins

NeonNinja

•

Smart move. Early filing is almost always the right call for priority protection.

0 coins

Amara Nwosu

•

Same here. I was waiting to file until we had final loan documents, but this convinced me to file the UCC-1 now with our draft security agreement.

0 coins

AstroExplorer

•

One last consideration - make sure your loan agreement coordinates with the attachment timing. Some loan agreements have conditions precedent that could delay funding, which would delay attachment. Review the closing conditions to make sure there's nothing that could create a gap between when you expect to fund and when you actually can fund.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Our loan agreement is pretty straightforward with standard conditions. The only major condition is the real estate closing, which is scheduled for the same day as our funding.

0 coins

AstroExplorer

•

Sounds like you're well-prepared. Just make sure both closings happen simultaneously or in the right order for your attachment timing.

0 coins

Paloma Clark

•

Been there with the last-minute search stress! One tip that's saved me multiple times - if you find any existing UCC-1 filings that might conflict, contact the secured party directly to see if they'll subordinate or if the collateral actually overlaps with yours. Sometimes what looks like a problem on paper isn't really an issue.

0 coins

Amy Fleming

•

That's a great suggestion. I hadn't thought about reaching out to other lenders directly.

0 coins

Paloma Clark

•

Most commercial lenders are reasonable about subordination agreements if there's no real conflict. Better to have the conversation before closing than discover issues after funding.

0 coins

Final thought - document everything for your file. Keep copies of the UCC-11 search request, the results, and any follow-up searches you had to do. Your compliance team will thank you later if there are ever questions about the lien search process.

0 coins

Elin Robinson

•

Before you submit, seriously consider running those entity documents through Certana.ai first. Five minutes of name verification could save you days if you have to resubmit the search.

0 coins

Alice Pierce

•

Good luck! Florida's system usually delivers on time when you pay for expedited processing.

0 coins

Anna Xian

•

For future filings, consider using one of those document checking services before you submit. I've heard good things about tools that verify name consistency across all your loan documents. Would save you from these rejection cycles.

0 coins

That would definitely help with our workflow. We do dozens of these filings monthly and name issues come up regularly.

0 coins

Anna Xian

•

Worth looking into for high-volume filers. The time saved on rejections and refiling probably pays for itself quickly.

0 coins

Rajan Walker

•

Update: Found the issue! The entity search showed "National Commercial Services LLC" (no comma) but our loan docs had "Nationwide Commercial Services, LLC" (with comma AND different first word). Turns out the client has two related entities - one National, one Nationwide. We were using the wrong entity entirely. Refiling with correct debtor name now. Thanks everyone for the guidance on checking state records first!

0 coins

Axel Bourke

•

This is exactly the kind of thing document verification tools catch automatically - would have flagged that entity mismatch before filing.

0 coins

Definitely looking into those verification tools for our next batch of filings. This kind of mistake is too costly to repeat.

0 coins

Manufacturing filings are always a pain because of all the different equipment types. Last month I had three rejections before realizing I needed separate supplement sections for fixtures vs equipment vs inventory. Maybe check if you need to break out your collateral categories differently?

0 coins

Oscar O'Neil

•

We do have some items that might qualify as fixtures. I'll review whether those need separate treatment on the supplement.

0 coins

Sophia Miller

•

Fixture filings are a whole different beast - definitely separate those out if any equipment is attached to the building.

0 coins

Mason Davis

•

UPDATE: Found the issue! It was a combination of debtor name formatting (extra space) and using an outdated supplement form. Got a clean filing accepted this morning. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - especially the idea to check form versions and use document verification tools. Crisis averted!

0 coins

Mia Rodriguez

•

Those little formatting details will get you every time. Great that you found it in time.

0 coins

Nice work tracking down the issues! Document verification definitely saves time on these multi-form filings.

0 coins

Chloe Green

•

Congrats on getting it resolved! Adding this to my mental database of Michigan UCC quirks.

0 coins

Mason Davis

•

Perfect example of why exact character matching is so important in UCC filings. Thanks for sharing the resolution!

0 coins

Prev1...373374375376377...684Next