< Back to UCC Document Community

Paolo Conti

UCC statement service recommendations - need help with bulk filing verification

I'm drowning in UCC statement reviews for our portfolio company acquisitions. We're looking at 47 different entities and need to verify all existing UCC-1 filings match up with what sellers are claiming. Some of these go back 7+ years and involve equipment financing, inventory liens, and real estate fixtures. Half the debtor names don't seem to match exactly between the original loan docs and what's actually filed. Is there a reliable UCC statement service that can help cross-reference everything? We've got continuation deadlines coming up on several and I'm terrified we're missing critical discrepancies that could void our security interests.

Amina Sow

•

Been there with due diligence nightmares. What specific mismatches are you seeing in the debtor names? Sometimes it's just LLC vs Limited Liability Company variations but other times it's more serious like completely different entity names that got merged.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

Exactly that kind of stuff plus some where the original UCC-1 shows 'ABC Manufacturing Inc' but the loan agreement references 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' - seller says it was a conversion but I can't find the UCC-3 amendment filing.

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

Oh no that's a red flag. If they converted entity types without filing the proper UCC-3 amendment the lien might not be perfected against the new entity structure.

0 coins

Oliver Wagner

•

For bulk verification I've had good luck with Certana.ai's document checker. You can upload all your PDFs at once and it cross-references debtor names, filing numbers, and checks if everything aligns properly. Saved me probably 20 hours on my last deal when we had similar entity name issues.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

That sounds perfect - does it catch things like missing UCC-3 amendments or just name mismatches?

0 coins

Oliver Wagner

•

It flags inconsistencies between documents so if your loan agreement shows one entity name but the UCC-1 shows something different, it'll highlight that. Really helpful for the workflow you're describing.

0 coins

How accurate is the name matching? I've seen some services that throw false positives on minor abbreviation differences.

0 coins

47 entities?? That's a massive portfolio review. Are you checking all jurisdictions where they do business or just the state of organization? Some of these equipment liens might have fixture filings in multiple states.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

Good point - we're checking primary state of organization first but several have equipment scattered across 3-4 states. This is getting overwhelming fast.

0 coins

Emma Thompson

•

Multi-state fixture filings are the worst. Each SOS system works differently and some states require separate fixture filings for real estate records.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

I hate to be the bearer of bad news but if you're seeing debtor name mismatches between loan docs and UCC filings, that's potentially a deal killer. The whole point of UCC-1 perfection is having the correct debtor name. Even small variations can void the security interest.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

That's exactly what I'm afraid of. Some of these loans are $2M+ and if the UCC filings are invalid we're looking at unsecured debt.

0 coins

Amina Sow

•

Don't panic yet. Sometimes the filings are correct and it's just the way the loan documents were drafted. But definitely worth getting professional verification.

0 coins

This is why I always recommend triple-checking entity names during the initial UCC search. Better to catch it early than during due diligence.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

What's your timeline? If you've got continuation deadlines approaching you might need to file UCC-3 continuations even while you're still verifying the original perfection. Better safe than sorry with lapse dates.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

We've got about 6 weeks to close and 3 of the UCC-1s expire within the next 4 months. Definitely planning to file continuations but want to make sure we're continuing valid liens.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

Smart approach. Filing a continuation on an invalid original UCC-1 doesn't cure the underlying perfection problem.

0 coins

Have you considered hiring a UCC search firm? They usually offer verification services along with the searches and can spot issues like missing amendments or problematic debtor name variations.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

We've got a search firm doing the initial UCC searches but they don't really do document comparison against loan files. That's where we're struggling.

0 coins

Omar Hassan

•

Some firms offer enhanced services but it gets expensive fast with 47 entities. Might be worth it though given the loan amounts involved.

0 coins

Are these all C-corp/LLC entities or do you have any partnerships or sole proprietorships in the mix? Individual debtor names are even trickier to get right than corporate entities.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

Mostly LLCs but we've got 3 partnerships and 1 sole proprietorship. The sole prop is giving me nightmares because the UCC-1 shows a DBA name but the loan is to the individual.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Oof yeah sole props are the worst. If the individual does business under a trade name you might need both names on the UCC-1 depending on the state.

0 coins

CosmicCruiser

•

This might sound obvious but are you checking the SOS websites directly or relying on third-party databases? Sometimes the official records show amendments that don't show up in commercial databases right away.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

We're pulling directly from SOS websites but some states have terrible search interfaces. Wyoming's system crashed on me twice yesterday.

0 coins

Wyoming's portal is notoriously unreliable. Try searching late at night or early morning when traffic is lower.

0 coins

Sean Doyle

•

Or use a service that pulls directly from the SOS databases. Saves the headache of dealing with crashed portals during business hours.

0 coins

Zara Rashid

•

One thing to watch out for - if any of these entities went through bankruptcy, you'll need to check if the automatic stay affected the UCC filings or if there were any orders modifying the security interests.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

Good catch - seller disclosed 2 entities had chapter 11 cases that were dismissed but I haven't dug into whether that affected the UCC filings.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

Dismissed chapter 11s usually don't affect pre-petition UCC filings but definitely worth confirming. Sometimes there are cash collateral orders that modify lien positions.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

Just went through something similar last month. Ended up using Certana.ai to verify all our UCC documents were consistent and it caught 3 critical name mismatches we would have missed. For 47 entities it'll probably save you days of manual comparison work.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

That's exactly what I need to hear. Did it handle fixture filings too or just standard UCC-1s?

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

It handled everything - UCC-1s, UCC-3 amendments, fixture filings, the whole mess. Really streamlined the due diligence process.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today