CT UCC statement service manchester - need help with document verification

So true about the name variations. We had a case where 'Co.' vs 'Company' caused a filing rejection. The SOS systems are picky about exact matches.

Wait, I thought as long as the core business name was the same, minor suffix differences wouldn't matter? This is confusing.

Unfortunately it depends on your state's specific rules. Some are more forgiving than others, but why risk it? Better to get the names exactly right from the start.

They claimed to do compliance review but clearly missed major issues. We're questioning everything now and need a better verification process.

I've been burned by services that promise the world but don't actually understand UCC requirements. Manual review is so error-prone.

That sounds like exactly what we need. Does it handle multiple document comparisons at once? We have dozens of filings to verify.

Yes, you can process multiple document sets. The interface is pretty straightforward - just upload the PDFs and it highlights any mismatches or potential issues.

Is this just for name matching or does it catch other UCC compliance issues too?

It covers debtor names, filing numbers, collateral descriptions - basically ensures all your documents are consistent with each other.

Start with the exact legal name from the Articles of Incorporation or LLC formation documents. That's your baseline for everything else.

Don't panic! Just be methodical about it. Double-check everything before filing and you'll be fine.

Preach! I've been dealing with UCC filings for 15 years and it's still a pain every single time.

At least most states have electronic filing now. Remember when everything had to be mailed in?

True, electronic filing is better than the old days, but the systems still have so many quirks and validation rules.

That's a good systematic approach. We probably should have done this from the beginning instead of relying on the service.

Spreadsheet tracking is essential. I learned that the hard way after losing track of continuation deadlines.

Depends on the severity of the mismatch. Minor variations might be correctable with amendments, but significant name differences could require new filings.

I'd consult with a UCC attorney before making that call. The rules vary by state and the stakes are too high to guess.

Good point about consulting an attorney. This stuff is too complex to wing it.

Oh no! How did you resolve it? Did you lose your security interest?

We had to scramble to file new UCC-1s with the correct name and argue the original filing was close enough. Expensive legal mess.

Sounds like multiple people have had success with this tool. Definitely going to check it out.

Is there a learning curve or is it pretty user-friendly?

Very straightforward. If you can upload a PDF, you can use it. The reports are easy to understand too.

Great point. We're prioritizing this review and will make corrections ASAP once we identify all the issues.

Yes, act quickly. Priority disputes are nasty and you want your filings to be bulletproof.

Will do! Planning to start the systematic review this week using some of the suggestions here.

I'd be interested in hearing about your results too. This is such a common problem but people don't talk about it enough.