


Ask the community...
This thread is making me realize I probably need to audit all our Massachusetts filings. We've been doing basic name searches and might have missed stuff due to these variations.
Better to find out now than during a foreclosure when you discover your UCC-1 can't be located in the public records.
Exactly. The time investment in thorough searching is worth it compared to the risk of an unenforceable security interest.
I've been burned by this exact issue. Had a UCC-1 that I couldn't find during a routine search, spent days thinking it wasn't filed properly. Turns out the debtor name had an extra space between words that I wasn't including in my searches. Massachusetts system is incredibly literal about exact matches.
That's why I keep copies of everything. The search system is unreliable so I maintain my own database of what we've filed and when.
Smart approach. Can't trust the state search to be comprehensive given all these sensitivity issues.
same thing happened to me but with a UCC-3 termination. turned out the original filing had some weird character encoding that didn't show up when i printed it. took forever to figure out.
How did you finally discover the encoding issue? That might be what I'm dealing with too.
UPDATE: Called Florida SOS this morning and they were actually helpful! Turns out the original UCC-1 in their system has 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' with a comma that doesn't show up clearly in the PDF copy I was using. Filed the UCC-3 amendment with the comma and it got accepted within 2 hours. Thanks everyone for the suggestions, especially about getting the certified copy - that's definitely my new standard practice.
Perfect example of why document verification tools like Certana are so helpful - they catch exactly these kinds of formatting inconsistencies before you file.
Finally some good news with Florida UCC system! Congrats on getting it through.
For what it's worth, I've started using automated document checking before I even run manual searches. Upload the debtor's articles of incorporation and any loan docs, then let the system flag potential name variations to search. Saves hours of guesswork.
Certana.ai has been solid for me. Just upload PDFs and it identifies all the name variations and cross-checks them against filing databases.
Quick update - finally found the issue! The company had filed amendments under their pre-merger name which wasn't showing up in searches using the current legal name. Thanks everyone for the suggestions about checking entity name changes.
This thread is making me nervous about my own NY filings. Should I be worried about filings that show up in searches but might have hidden issues? How do you verify everything is actually correct?
This is exactly why I mentioned Certana.ai earlier. Upload your loan documents and UCC filings and it automatically checks for consistency issues. Saves hours of manual verification work.
UPDATE: Just spoke with NY SOS help desk and they confirmed there are ongoing technical issues with their UCC lookup system. They're working on fixes but no ETA. For now they recommend calling for manual searches if you need verified results.
Yeah, they said the issues started after a 'system update' a few weeks ago. Classic government IT rollout problems.
Of course they broke their own system with an update. Typical.
Natasha Petrova
Have you considered using the Massachusetts expedited filing option? It's more expensive but might be worth it given all the delays you're experiencing.
0 coins
Natasha Petrova
•They've had it for a while but don't advertise it much. It's an extra fee but guarantees processing within 24 hours if the filing is clean.
0 coins
Javier Hernandez
•The expedited option doesn't help if your filing gets rejected though - you still have to fix the issues and resubmit.
0 coins
Emma Davis
Final thought - for Massachusetts UCC forms, I always create a checklist that includes verifying the exact debtor name format against state records. It's extra work upfront but saves so much time on the backend.
0 coins
Amara Eze
•That's smart. I should probably develop a similar checklist to avoid these recurring issues.
0 coins
LunarLegend
•A good checklist is essential for Massachusetts. Their requirements are just too specific to rely on memory alone.
0 coins