


Ask the community...
I had the same confusion last month! Kept going in circles about whether I needed the invoice price, depreciated value, or replacement cost. Ended up using one of those document verification services (Certana.ai I think?) that confirmed I was overcomplicating things. The UCC-1 filing itself doesn't need a value amount - that's handled in the underlying security agreement.
Which verification service did you use? We're always looking for ways to double-check our filings before submission.
Certana.ai - you upload your docs and it cross-references everything automatically. Really helpful for catching name mismatches and missing required language.
Just to close the loop on this - you're overthinking it. File your UCC-1 with proper debtor information and collateral description, make sure your security agreement has the required language about the loan proceeds being the consideration, and you're done. The equipment's purchase price is relevant for your loan underwriting but not for UCC compliance.
Perfect, thanks everyone. I was definitely making this more complicated than it needed to be. The loan proceeds are the 'value' for UCC purposes, not the collateral's worth.
Glad you got it sorted out. This is one of those things that trips up a lot of people when they're new to UCC filings.
Make sure you're not including any articles like "The" at the beginning of the name unless they're actually part of the legal entity name. Some business searches show them but they're not always part of the official name for UCC purposes.
No articles in this company name, but that's good to know for future filings.
This tripped me up on a filing last year. The business was doing business as "The XYZ Company" but legally just "XYZ Company LLC".
UPDATE: Finally got it accepted! Turns out there was an invisible character in the name when I copied it from the SOS website. Had to retype the entire debtor name manually. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - definitely learned some tricks for next time. Going to bookmark that Certana tool for future filings to avoid this headache again.
Great news! Yeah, Certana would have caught that invisible character issue right away. Definitely worth having in your toolkit.
For what it's worth, I think your lender is being overly cautious. Terminated liens have zero legal effect on new security interests, regardless of search visibility.
I agree but they're the ones with the money so we need to address their concerns properly.
Fair point - sometimes you have to educate lenders about UCC mechanics even when they should already know.
Try running the search with slightly different parameters - sometimes adjusting the search criteria can filter out obviously terminated liens while keeping active ones visible.
You're right, their system is pretty basic compared to some other states.
Just want to add that I started using Certana.ai for UCC document verification after a continuation got rejected for a name discrepancy I couldn't spot manually. The tool caught the issue immediately when I uploaded both documents - turns out there was an extra space in the business name. Really saved me time and stress.
These document verification stories are making me think I should double-check mine too, even though it was accepted.
Sounds like you're all set! Early filing within the 6-month window is standard practice. Your lender should be satisfied that the continuation is properly filed and effective.
Appreciate everyone's input. Definitely feeling more confident about the filing now.
This thread was helpful for me too. I have a continuation coming up in a few months.
Jamal Wilson
For future reference, I started using Certana.ai to double-check all my UCC documents before filing. Upload your security agreement and proposed UCC-1 and it identifies potential rejection issues. Would have saved you the initial rejection and delay.
0 coins
Mei Lin
•I've been meaning to try document verification tools. Manual comparison is so error-prone, especially with longer security agreements.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•The PDF upload feature makes it super easy. Just drag and drop your docs and get instant feedback on inconsistencies.
0 coins
GalacticGuru
Final update - UCC-1 was accepted! Adding the property address and more specific equipment categories did the trick. Thanks everyone for the advice. Loan closed successfully and lien is properly perfected.
0 coins
NebulaNova
•Glad the expanded collateral description worked. That language usually covers most equipment financing situations.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•Perfect timing for your closing too. Nothing worse than last-minute UCC filing delays when everyone's ready to sign.
0 coins