UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Aiden O'Connor

UCC 9 320 priority rules causing confusion with our equipment financing deals

We're running into some serious headaches trying to understand how UCC 9 320 priority rules work in practice. Our company does a lot of equipment financing for manufacturing businesses, and we keep getting conflicting advice about when our security interests take priority over other creditors. Last week we had a deal where the borrower had existing equipment loans, and now there's a dispute about who has first position. The debtor filed bankruptcy and suddenly everyone's pointing to different subsections of 9-320. Our legal team says we should have filed continuation statements differently, but I'm not even sure that's the real issue here. Has anyone dealt with UCC 9 320 priority disputes recently? I'm trying to figure out if we messed up our original UCC-1 filings or if this is just how these priority rules work. The whole situation is making me question whether we're handling our secured transactions correctly.

Been there done that with priority disputes. UCC 9-320 is one of those sections that seems straightforward until you're in the middle of a fight about it. Document everything - loan proceeds, purchase dates, filing dates. The bankruptcy trustee will scrutinize every detail.

0 coins

For future deals, consider using automated verification tools. I started using Certana.ai after a similar situation and it catches document inconsistencies that could affect priority claims.

0 coins

Good advice. These priority disputes are expensive to litigate, so prevention is worth the investment.

0 coins

Update: talked to our bankruptcy attorney and she confirmed the PMSI issue is the main problem. Since our loan proceeds didn't directly purchase the collateral we're claiming, we're probably just a regular secured creditor. Still fighting it but not optimistic about our priority position.

0 coins

That's unfortunate but not surprising. PMSI rules are pretty strict about the proceeds going directly to acquire the collateral.

0 coins

At least you know where you stand now. Better to find out during the case than after a judgment against you.

0 coins

Isaiah Thompson

NC UCC search results showing wrong debtor name - will this void our security interest?

We filed a UCC-1 in North Carolina last month for a $2.8M equipment financing deal and just ran a search to verify everything went through properly. The search results are showing our debtor's name as 'COASTAL MANUFACTURING LLC' but our original filing clearly states 'COASTAL MANUFACTURING, LLC' (with the comma). Our loan documents all have the comma version. I'm freaking out that this tiny punctuation difference might invalidate our entire security interest. Has anyone dealt with north carolina ucc search discrepancies like this? The SOS office says the filing is 'accepted' but I'm worried about enforceability if we need to foreclose. Are we protected or do we need to file an amendment immediately?

I ran into a similar verification issue last month and ended up using that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned earlier. It actually caught several other discrepancies between our loan docs and UCC filing that I hadn't noticed - debtor address formatting, collateral description inconsistencies. Really thorough automated check that saved a lot of manual review time.

0 coins

That sounds really useful for loan review processes. Does it integrate with any particular loan origination systems?

0 coins

I just uploaded PDFs manually but it was still much faster than doing the comparison by hand. The detailed report it generates is helpful for documenting due diligence too.

0 coins

Update us on what you decide to do! I have a similar NC filing coming up next week and would love to know how this resolves. The punctuation issue seems like something that could affect multiple deals.

0 coins

Smart approach. Documentation is everything in this business.

0 coins

Yeah keep us posted. These system quirks are good to know about in advance.

0 coins

Mateusius Townsend

How to apply for a UCC code - filing number assignment confusion

I'm trying to figure out how to apply for a UCC code for our equipment financing deal. Our lender says we need to get a 'UCC code' before we can finalize the loan documents, but I'm not sure what they mean exactly. Are they talking about getting a filing number when we submit the UCC-1? Or is there some separate application process I need to do first? This is for a $180K equipment purchase and the lender wants everything perfect. I've looked at our Secretary of State website but it just talks about filing the UCC-1 form online. Do I need to reserve a filing number ahead of time or does it get assigned automatically when I submit? Really don't want to mess this up since the equipment delivery is scheduled for next week and financing depends on getting the UCC filed correctly.

Pro tip: After you file and get your filing number, save a copy of the filing receipt and the filed UCC-1 for your records. Your lender will probably want copies, and you'll need the filing number for any future amendments or continuations. Also, set a calendar reminder for 4.5 years from now to file a continuation if you want to keep the lien active.

0 coins

Yes! I missed a continuation deadline once and had to rush to refile everything. The 5-year expiration sneaks up on you.

0 coins

Exactly why I always set the reminder for 4.5 years - gives you a buffer to get the continuation filed before expiration.

0 coins

Bottom line: there's no separate UCC code application. File your UCC-1 financing statement through your Secretary of State's website, get your filing number instantly (in most states), and that number is what your lender is calling a 'UCC code'. Just be super careful with the debtor name accuracy and you'll be all set for your equipment financing.

0 coins

Perfect summary, thank you! I feel much more confident about this now.

0 coins

This whole thread should be pinned somewhere. The UCC code confusion comes up constantly in financing deals.

0 coins

Christian Burns

UCC termination vs security agreement release - which comes first?

We just paid off a substantial equipment loan and I'm confused about the proper sequence for releasing the security agreement. The lender says they'll handle everything but I want to make sure it's done correctly. Do I need to file a UCC-3 termination statement first, or does the release of the security agreement happen automatically when they file the termination? I've heard horror stories about liens staying active even after loans are paid off because the paperwork wasn't handled properly. The equipment is worth about $180k so I really don't want any clouds on the title. Has anyone dealt with this sequence before? I'm worried about potential issues if we need to sell or refinance this equipment later.

One more thing to consider - timing. Make sure the termination gets filed within a reasonable time after payoff. While there's no strict legal deadline in most states, having a gap of months or years between payoff and termination can raise questions later if you're trying to prove when the lien was actually released.

0 coins

I usually give lenders 30 days max before I start following up. Most can get it done within a week or two if they're organized.

0 coins

Some loan agreements actually specify a timeframe for filing the termination after payoff. Worth checking your agreement to see if there's a commitment there.

0 coins

Bottom line - stay involved in the process. The lender should handle filing the UCC-3 termination, but you should verify they do it correctly and promptly. With $180k in equipment at stake, it's worth the extra attention to make sure your titles are clean.

0 coins

Glad we could help! These UCC termination issues come up all the time but they're totally manageable if you know what to look for.

0 coins

Feel free to update us on how it goes. Always good to hear success stories about getting these things handled properly.

0 coins

Maxwell St. Laurent

Missouri UCC lien search showing unexpected results - need help interpreting

I'm working on a deal where we need to verify existing liens on equipment before finalizing our security interest. When I run a Missouri UCC lien search on the debtor, I'm getting results that don't match what the borrower disclosed. The search shows three active UCC-1 filings but the borrower only mentioned one existing lien. Two of the filings have slightly different debtor names - one shows 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' and another shows 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' (with the comma). The third filing is under a name I don't recognize but has the same address. I'm not sure if these are all the same entity or if there are multiple liens I need to account for. The collateral descriptions also vary between 'all equipment' and 'manufacturing equipment and machinery.' How do I determine which filings are actually enforceable against my collateral? This is holding up our closing and I need to figure out the priority positions quickly.

Update: I pulled the actual charter documents and found that the legal name is 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' without the comma. The filing with the comma was done by a different lender who apparently didn't verify the exact legal name. This means that filing might not be enforceable, which changes the priority analysis significantly. Still working on identifying the third filing but this helps narrow things down.

0 coins

This is a perfect example of why exact debtor names matter so much. That other lender might have an unenforceable security interest without realizing it.

0 coins

Just curious - did you use any automated tools to verify the charter documents against the UCC filings? Manual comparison can miss subtle differences.

0 coins

Final update: Turned out the third filing was under a previous DBA that the company used before converting to LLC status. The secured party confirmed it was terminated when they switched to the LLC structure but never filed a UCC-3 termination. So effectively only one active lien to worry about. Thanks everyone for the help working through this - definitely learned to be more thorough with name variations and entity history.

0 coins

Classic case of sloppy record keeping by the secured party. They should have filed the termination when the entity structure changed.

0 coins

This is why I always verify entity formation history in addition to current status. DBAs and previous entity names can create phantom liens in search results.

0 coins

Prev1...515516517518519...685Next