Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just curious - what's the filing fee for UCC-3 continuations in Georgia these days? I haven't filed one there in a while.
It's $15 for electronic filing, $25 for paper filing. Pretty reasonable compared to some other states.
That's not bad. Some states charge way more for continuations.
This whole thread is making me nervous about my own Georgia filings. I have two continuations coming up this year and now I'm worried about name formatting issues. Going to pull all my original UCC-1s and double-check everything.
Better safe than sorry! The stress of a rejected filing close to the deadline is not worth it.
Smart move. I keep a calendar reminder 6 months before each lapse date so I have plenty of time to deal with any issues.
Join the conversation
Just want to second the Certana.ai recommendation. I was initially skeptical too but it really does streamline the verification process. The Charter→UCC-1 check workflow caught several name mismatches between our corporate filings and UCC documents that could have caused problems later. For a portfolio audit like this, the time savings alone would be worth it.
I still think manual verification is safer for critical filings, but I admit the volume you're dealing with might make that impractical.
The tool doesn't replace good judgment, but it does flag potential issues you might miss in manual review. Especially helpful for catching subtle debtor name variations.
One more thought - document everything you're doing for this audit. Your examiners will want to see your process and how you prioritized the review. Having a clear methodology will help if you can't get through all 800 before your deadline.
Yeah, examiners love to see risk-based prioritization and systematic approaches, even if you can't complete everything.
Also keep screenshots of any portal errors or system issues. Sometimes that helps explain delays in compliance reviews.
Join the conversation
Just confirming what others said - use the exact name from the articles of incorporation. If it says 'Midwest Grain Cooperative, Inc.' that's what goes on your UCC-1. The DBA or operating name is irrelevant for UCC purposes. Don't let the equipment dealer pressure you into using the wrong format.
Equipment dealers often don't understand UCC naming requirements. They just want whatever's on their sales paperwork.
Right, but the lender is ultimately responsible for proper perfection. Can't blame the dealer if the filing gets rejected.
Update: We ended up pulling the most recent articles of incorporation and good standing certificate. The legal name is definitely 'Midwest Grain Cooperative, Inc.' so that's what we're using on the UCC-1. Also ran everything through Certana.ai's document checker just to be absolutely sure all our paperwork aligns. Thanks for all the advice - this thread probably saved us from a costly rejection during the busiest time of year.
How long did the Certana verification take? Might be useful for our next coop financing.
Maybe 5 minutes total. Just uploaded the articles, loan agreement, and UCC draft and got an instant report showing everything matched properly.
Join the conversation
This might sound obvious but double-check that all your addendum pages are actually signed if signatures are required. I've had rejections because I forgot to sign page 2 of a multi-page addendum.
Good catch - I'll verify all signatures are in place.
Also make sure whoever signed has authority. Some states are getting stricter about verifying signatory authority on complex filings.
UPDATE: Got it figured out! It was a combination of issues - we weren't numbering the addendum pages properly, had slight formatting differences in the debtor name between forms, and our reference language on the main form wasn't explicit enough. Used some of the suggestions here and all three filings went through. Thanks everyone!
Great outcome. Always satisfying when multiple small fixes solve a big problem.
Nice work troubleshooting it. For future complex filings, that document checker I mentioned earlier has saved me so much time on catching these little inconsistencies before submission.
Ella Cofer
For SC specifically, make sure you understand their continuation requirements too. I know you're doing a search not a filing, but it's worth knowing that SC requires continuations to be filed within 6 months before the 5-year anniversary. Some of the UCC-1s you find might be close to lapsing.
0 coins
Ella Cofer
•Depends on your transaction structure. If you're taking a senior position you might not care if junior liens lapse, but if there's any question about priority you'll want to factor that into your risk analysis.
0 coins
Finnegan Gunn
•Also worth noting that a lien that lapses and then gets revived through a late continuation can affect priority in some situations. Something to discuss with your client if you find any close calls.
0 coins
Kevin Bell
Quick question - are you also checking federal tax liens and state tax liens? Those don't always show up in UCC searches but can definitely affect your deal. SC has separate databases for those.
0 coins
Jasmine Hernandez
•Good catch, I was planning to do that separately but you're right that it's important for the overall lien picture. Do you know if SC's tax lien searches are online too?
0 coins
Kevin Bell
•Federal tax liens you have to check with the IRS, but SC state tax liens should be searchable through their Department of Revenue. I think there might be a fee but it's not too expensive.
0 coins