Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Quick question - are you seeing these discrepancies across all states or just certain ones? Some Secretary of State offices have better data export standards than others, which affects what D&B receives.
Lilly Curtis
•Good question. It seems worse in states like Delaware and Nevada where we have a lot of filings. The formatting is more consistent in states like Texas and California.
Jabari-Jo
•That makes sense. Delaware's UCC database has known formatting limitations that affect third-party data aggregators like D&B.
Been there! The key thing to remember is that D&B is a secondary source. For legal purposes, what matters is what's filed with the state. Keep good records of your actual filings and you'll be fine, even if D&B's formatting is wonky.
Lilly Curtis
•That's reassuring. I guess I was overthinking the potential impact on our security interests.
Micah Trail
•You're not overthinking it - due diligence issues are real. But as long as your underlying filings are solid, the D&B formatting problems are more of an annoyance than a legal risk.
Join the conversation
Vince Eh
Don't forget about the 6-month window for continuations. You're cutting it close but still within the acceptable timeframe for most states.
Vince Eh
•Smart to plan for rejections. That's why getting the debtor names exactly right the first time is so critical.
This is why I always set reminders 90 days before continuation deadlines. Gives you buffer for exactly this kind of issue.
Update us on how it goes! I'm sure others here will face similar bulk continuation challenges. Good luck with getting them all filed cleanly.
Will do. Thanks for all the advice everyone. Going to try the document verification approach and see if that helps with the name matching issues.
Smart approach. Prevention is always better than dealing with rejections after the fact.
Join the conversation
Dyllan Nantx
For future reference, I keep a backup plan for situations like this. There are private search companies that can pull UCC data when the state portals are down, though they charge more. Worth having their contact info for emergencies.
Could you share some names? I'd rather pay extra than miss a deadline.
Dyllan Nantx
•I'll send you a private message with the ones I've used. Don't want to advertise on here.
Update: just tried again this morning and the portal seems to be working better. Still not perfect but at least my searches are completing. Might have been a temporary issue that's getting resolved.
Anna Xian
•Just tried too and you're right, it's definitely improved from yesterday.
Dananyl Lear
•Still being cautious and doing small batches though. Don't want to jinx it!
Join the conversation
Update us when you figure it out! I do a lot of equipment financing in Tennessee and want to know what the magic format is for future reference.
CyberNinja
•Will definitely post an update once I get it resolved. Hoping the comma fix does the trick.
Ava Williams
•Same here, this thread has been really educational about Tennessee's pickiness.
One more suggestion - make sure you're using the most current version of Tennessee's UCC-1 form. They sometimes update forms and the old versions get rejected even if the content is correct.
This is why I always download forms fresh for each filing instead of using saved copies.
Smart practice. Form version issues have bitten me before on other state filings.
Jade O'Malley
Just want to follow up on this thread since I'm dealing with similar volume issues in Ohio. Did you end up trying the XML upload route with Kentucky?
0 coins
Jade O'Malley
•Awesome, definitely update this thread when you get that info. Could be useful for all of us doing high-volume filing.
0 coins
Brianna Schmidt
•Same here - would love to know how the XML route works out. Been thinking about it for my Delaware filings.
0 coins
Lucy Lam
Update: tried the Certana document checker and it's actually pretty slick. Caught 3 debtor name inconsistencies in my last batch that would have definitely caused rejections. Not a filing service but definitely saves time on the backend.
0 coins
Harper Thompson
•Good to know. I'm going to give it a try on my next batch of filings. Even if it just prevents rejections that's worth it.
0 coins
Andrew Pinnock
•Glad it's working for others too. The charter-to-UCC comparison feature is really solid.
0 coins