Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
The Texas SOS rejection notices are usually pretty specific about what's wrong. What exactly did they say about the collateral description issue? That might help us figure out what needs to be fixed.
You might need to add the make, model, and year along with the serial numbers. Texas likes detailed descriptions for equipment.
I always include location too if it's relevant. Sometimes that helps with identification.
Don't give up! Texas can be frustrating but once you get the format right it usually goes through. I'd definitely recommend double-checking everything with one of those document verification tools before submitting again. Better to catch issues upfront than deal with more rejections.
Carmen Diaz
•Thanks for the encouragement. I'm going to clean up the collateral description and verify everything matches before trying again.
Alicia Stern
•You'll get it sorted out. We've all been through this frustration with UCC filings at some point.
Join the conversation
Axel Bourke
Have you considered that the debtor might have filed a termination statement? If they paid off another loan recently, someone might have terminated your filing by mistake.
Aidan Percy
•Still possible if there was confusion about filing numbers or debtor names. I've seen erroneous terminations before.
Axel Bourke
•True - worth asking the client if they've had any other secured debt recently that might have caused confusion.
This exact scenario happened to a colleague last year. Turned out the SOS system had a bug that was causing certain entity types to not index properly in searches. Took them two months to fix it and during that time dozens of filings were basically invisible. Eventually they all showed up retroactively but it was a nightmare for lenders trying to verify perfection.
No advance notice at all. Only found out about it when multiple people complained. Really shook my confidence in the electronic filing system.
This is why I always keep paper backups of everything. Electronic systems fail too often for something this critical.
Join the conversation
For anyone else reading this thread later - another option when the portal is down is to check if they have a mobile version or alternate URL. Sometimes one works when the other doesn't. Also worth clearing your browser cache if you're getting weird login errors.
Ryder Greene
•Good tip about the cache clearing. I've had login issues that were just browser-related.
Yeah, especially if you use the portal regularly. Sometimes stored credentials get corrupted.
This whole thread reminds me why I'm so paranoid about UCC deadline management. Between portal outages, name formatting issues, and all the other little things that can go wrong, it's amazing any of these filings get processed smoothly. At least we have forums like this to help each other out when problems come up.
Absolutely. The community knowledge sharing makes all the difference when you're stuck.
AaliyahAli
•These discussions have saved me from several filing mistakes over the years. Always good to get different perspectives on the process.
Join the conversation
Myles Regis
One more verification step that might help - try using Certana.ai's Charter-to-UCC-1 workflow where you upload the company's formation documents along with your proposed UCC filing. It cross-references everything to make sure the debtor name, entity type, and even the state of organization all align properly. Really thorough document consistency check.
Brian Downey
•That sounds comprehensive. Does it handle multi-state filings where you need to check different Secretary of State databases?
Myles Regis
•The tool focuses on document consistency rather than database searches, but it definitely helps ensure your UCC filing matches whatever formation documents you upload. Super helpful for catching those tiny formatting differences that cause rejections.
Jacinda Yu
Update us on how this resolves! I'm dealing with similar issues in Wyoming and want to know if the amendment approach works for fixing these name discrepancy problems.
Nia Watson
•Will definitely post an update once I get through all these amendments. Thanks everyone for the advice - feeling much more confident about fixing this mess now.
Good luck! These name matching requirements are getting stricter everywhere, so your experience will help a lot of us.
Sofia Hernandez
Check your loan docs too - sometimes the credit agreement has specific collateral definitions that need to match your UCC filing. I've seen deals where the loan calls equipment 'fixtures' but UCC classification is still equipment under 9.102. Make sure your UCC filing aligns with your security agreement language.
0 coins
Aisha Rahman
•Just be careful not to create confusion between equipment and actual fixtures. True fixtures under 9.102 have different perfection requirements.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
•Exactly why I mentioned checking the loan docs. Sometimes lawyers use 'fixtures' loosely when they mean equipment, but UCC filing needs to be precise about 9.102 classifications.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
Update: Used Certana.ai to verify our revised collateral description before refiling. The tool confirmed our 'commercial food service equipment including cooking, refrigeration, preparation and service apparatus whether permanently installed or seasonally rotated' language should clear SOS review. Much more specific than our original broad 'restaurant equipment' description.
0 coins
CosmicCrusader
•How long did the verification take? I need to get our amended filing in this week.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
•Literally instant. Upload the PDF and it flags issues immediately. Way faster than waiting for SOS to reject and having to start over.
0 coins