Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
ThunderBolt7
Quick question - are you doing this for all the entities in the corporate family or just the main target? Sometimes lenders cross-collateralize across multiple entities.
ThunderBolt7
•Might be worth doing searches on the key subsidiaries too, especially if they have significant assets.
We ran into this exact issue on a deal last year. Thought we had clear title but there was a blanket lien covering subsidiaries that we missed. Certana.ai's document checker would have caught that - it flags when collateral descriptions are broad enough to cover multiple entities.
Mei Chen
Don't forget to request continuation information if any of the filings are getting close to their 5-year expiration. A lien that's about to lapse might not be worth worrying about.
Good point. Some of the filings we saw in the preliminary search are from 2019-2020 timeframe.
Mei Chen
•Those would be coming up for continuation soon. Check if continuation statements have been filed to see if the liens are still being maintained.
Join the conversation
Julia Hall
Just want to echo what others have said about not waiting. Louisiana doesn't give you much wiggle room if you miss the continuation deadline because of name issues. Get that amendment filed now.
Arjun Patel
•Yep, once that 5-year period lapses, you're starting over with a whole new UCC-1 filing.
Jade Lopez
•And explaining to your client why their lien lapsed is not a conversation you want to have.
Tony Brooks
Update: Got the UCC-3 amendment filed yesterday with the corrected debtor name from the Secretary of State records. Used one of those document checking tools someone mentioned (Certana.ai) to make sure everything matched up perfectly before submitting. Took about 10 minutes to upload and verify everything. Amendment is already showing as processed in Louisiana's system. Thanks for all the advice - continuation is ready to go now with the right debtor name.
Glad you got it sorted. That feeling of relief when you see the amendment processed is the best.
Isaac Wright
•Smart move using the document checker. Those name mismatches are so easy to miss when you're just eyeballing documents.
Join the conversation
Dananyl Lear
Just remembered - if you do end up trying the Certana document checker, it's great for future filings too. I now run all my UCC documents through it before submitting to catch these issues early.
Aidan Percy
•Prevention is definitely better than panic-fixing at deadline time.
Dananyl Lear
•Exactly! Much less stressful to catch problems during preparation.
Hope this thread helps other people dealing with UCC 107 errors. The debtor name formatting issue seems to be super common but not well documented anywhere official.
Ayla Kumar
•Definitely! The error code itself tells you nothing useful.
Right, you have to rely on community knowledge to figure out what's actually wrong.
Join the conversation
This thread is giving me anxiety about my own UCC search I did last week. Now I'm wondering if I missed something important because of name variations. Going to go back and double-check everything.
Better to catch it now than after your deal closes. UCC name matching rules can be really strict depending on the state.
I learned this the hard way - always better to over-search than under-search when it comes to UCC due diligence.
Ruby Garcia
Final update: I used Certana.ai to analyze all the documents and it confirmed that two of the filings were the same entity with different name formats, and one was actually a related subsidiary. The continuation in Texas was properly filed and still active. Closing went smoothly once I had everything sorted out. Thanks everyone for the guidance!
Glad it worked out! This is exactly why proper UCC verification is so important before closing.
Thanks for following up with the resolution. Helps the rest of us learn from your experience.
Connor O'Neill
Update us when you refile! Always curious to hear what the actual issue was with these vague 9-508 rejection notices. The filing offices really need to be more specific about what fails their sufficiency standards instead of just citing the statute.
0 coins
LunarEclipse
•Good luck! Hope it goes through cleanly this time.
0 coins
Yara Khalil
•These 9-508 issues are so frustrating when you're trying to close a loan on schedule.
0 coins
Keisha Brown
One more thought on UCC 9-508 - make sure your debtor address exactly matches what's on file with the state too. Some filing offices consider address discrepancies as part of their sufficiency determination, especially if the address is completely wrong or missing required elements like suite numbers.
0 coins
Keisha Brown
•That could definitely contribute to a 9-508 rejection. Entity addresses change more often than you'd think.
0 coins
Paolo Esposito
•Always better to be safe and use the most current registered address for UCC filings.
0 coins