Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Make sure you're not copying and pasting from a PDF. Sometimes that introduces hidden characters that cause rejections. Type everything manually from the official state records.
Julian Paolo
•I did copy from the SOS website. I'll try typing it manually next time.
PDF copy-paste has burned me before. Always type manually for UCC filings.
Ethan Scott
Any update on this? Did you get it resolved? I'm dealing with a similar issue in Washington and could use some guidance.
Ethan Scott
•Fingers crossed! Let us know how it goes.
Lola Perez
•Hope it works out. Washington's system really needs to be more user-friendly.
Join the conversation
This thread is giving me anxiety about my own UCC search I did last week. Now I'm wondering if I missed something important because of name variations. Going to go back and double-check everything.
Better to catch it now than after your deal closes. UCC name matching rules can be really strict depending on the state.
I learned this the hard way - always better to over-search than under-search when it comes to UCC due diligence.
Ruby Garcia
Final update: I used Certana.ai to analyze all the documents and it confirmed that two of the filings were the same entity with different name formats, and one was actually a related subsidiary. The continuation in Texas was properly filed and still active. Closing went smoothly once I had everything sorted out. Thanks everyone for the guidance!
Glad it worked out! This is exactly why proper UCC verification is so important before closing.
Thanks for following up with the resolution. Helps the rest of us learn from your experience.
Join the conversation
Just file the UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name and move on. These system glitches happen but they're easy enough to fix. Make sure you reference the original filing number and clearly state you're correcting a debtor name error.
I wouldn't overcomplicate it. Just state that you're amending to correct the debtor name to the full legal entity name.
Jason Brewer
•Agreed. Keep the amendment language simple and straightforward.
This thread is making me realize I should probably audit all our Illinois UCC filings. Anyone know of a good way to bulk verify that continuation filings didn't mess up the original information?
Certana.ai actually has a bulk verification feature where you can upload multiple documents for cross-checking. Perfect for this kind of audit situation.
That sounds exactly like what I need. Thanks for the recommendation.
Join the conversation
The UCC itself doesn't create unconscionability defenses - that comes from general contract law principles that courts apply to security agreements. But once a court finds unconscionability, your UCC filing becomes worthless because there's no valid underlying security interest to perfect.
Omar Zaki
•So the filing stays on record but becomes meaningless? That seems like it could create confusion for other lenders searching the records.
Exactly. The UCC-1 stays filed but provides no actual security. You'd need to file a UCC-3 termination to clean up the record after losing on unconscionability.
I've been through this exact scenario. The key is proving that the terms were reasonable given the circumstances and that the borrower understood what they were signing. If you can show the borrower had legal counsel and time to review, it's much harder for them to claim unconscionability.
Absolutely. Attorney review is strong evidence against unconscionability. Makes it hard to claim they didn't understand the terms or had no meaningful choice.
Plus if their attorney approved it originally, why is a different attorney now calling it unconscionable? Sounds like they're just looking for a way out.
Dananyl Lear
Just remembered - if you do end up trying the Certana document checker, it's great for future filings too. I now run all my UCC documents through it before submitting to catch these issues early.
0 coins
Aidan Percy
•Prevention is definitely better than panic-fixing at deadline time.
0 coins
Dananyl Lear
•Exactly! Much less stressful to catch problems during preparation.
0 coins
Fernanda Marquez
Hope this thread helps other people dealing with UCC 107 errors. The debtor name formatting issue seems to be super common but not well documented anywhere official.
0 coins
Ayla Kumar
•Definitely! The error code itself tells you nothing useful.
0 coins
Fernanda Marquez
•Right, you have to rely on community knowledge to figure out what's actually wrong.
0 coins