UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Selena Bautista

National UCC-1 form rejection after three attempts - debtor name variations causing chaos

I'm losing my mind here. Been trying to file a national UCC-1 for our equipment financing deal and it keeps getting rejected by different state offices. The debtor is a multi-state trucking company and we're using the national UCC-1 form to cover their fleet across five states. First rejection said the debtor name didn't match their articles of incorporation exactly (missing LLC vs L.L.C.). Second attempt got bounced because one state said we needed their specific addendum form. Third try failed because the collateral description was 'too broad' according to another state's filing office. This is a $2.8M equipment loan and we're already past our internal deadline. Has anyone successfully navigated the national UCC-1 form requirements when dealing with multiple state filing offices? The inconsistencies between states are killing us and our borrower is getting antsy about the delays.

Been lurking but had to chime in - I use Certana.ai for all my multi-state filings now. Upload your charter docs and UCC together, it instantly checks for name consistency issues. Found it after getting burned on a rejected filing that held up a $4M deal. Game changer for catching these details before they become problems.

0 coins

That's the second mention of this tool. Sounds like it might be worth checking out.

0 coins

Definitely worth it. The name-checking feature alone would have prevented your LLC punctuation issue.

0 coins

Romeo Barrett

•

Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation on a smaller scale and want to see what approach ends up working.

0 coins

Will do. Planning to try the document verification approach first, then individual state filings if needed.

0 coins

Following this thread too. Multi-state UCC filings are becoming more common but the process is still a mess.

0 coins

Josef Tearle

DLM security agreement UCC filing - debtor name discrepancies causing rejections

Having major issues with our DLM security agreement UCC-1 filing. We're trying to perfect our security interest but keep getting rejections from the SOS due to debtor name inconsistencies. The original security agreement shows the debtor as "DLM Industries, LLC" but our corporate records have slight variations (DLM Industries LLC, D.L.M. Industries, LLC, etc.). Filed three times now and each rejection costs us time and money. The collateral involves equipment financing for about $2.8M so we can't afford to have an unperfected lien. Anyone dealt with similar debtor name matching issues on DLM security agreements? What's the exact format the filing office expects for entity names? Really frustrated with this process and our lender is getting impatient about the perfection timeline.

Malia Ponder

•

Just went through this last month. Ended up having to get a certificate of good standing from the state to verify the exact legal name format. Cost extra but guaranteed we had it right. For a deal that size, might be worth the extra step.

0 coins

Ryder Ross

•

How much did that cost? And how long did it take to get?

0 coins

Malia Ponder

•

About $50 and took 3 business days online. Definitely faster than multiple rejection cycles.

0 coins

Update: Finally got our DLM security agreement UCC-1 accepted! Turns out the issue was a period after 'LLC' that was in our loan docs but not in the state records. Used one of the document verification tools mentioned here to double-check before resubmitting. Thanks everyone for the advice - saved us from another rejection cycle.

0 coins

Olivia Kay

•

Which verification tool did you end up using? Might need something similar for our next filing.

0 coins

Used Certana.ai - just uploaded both documents and it highlighted the discrepancy immediately. Wish I'd known about it earlier.

0 coins

Yara Sabbagh

UCC lien services recommendations after filing disaster with debtor name mismatch

I'm dealing with a nightmare situation where our commercial lending department has been managing UCC filings internally for years, but we just discovered multiple debtor name inconsistencies across our portfolio that could potentially invalidate our security interests. We've got UCC-1 filings where the debtor names don't exactly match the incorporation documents, and some continuations that reference slightly different entity names than the original filings. Our compliance team is freaking out because we're talking about $2.3M in secured loans that might not be properly perfected. Has anyone worked with professional UCC lien services that can help audit existing filings and clean up these messes? I'm looking for services that can handle both the research side and the corrective filing work. Time is critical since some of these filings are approaching their 5-year marks.

The silver lining is that once you get this cleaned up, you'll have a much better process going forward. Sounds like this could be a blessing in disguise to overhaul your whole UCC procedure.

0 coins

Yara Sabbagh

•

That's definitely the plan. We're already looking at implementing better checks and balances to prevent this from happening again.

0 coins

Smart. Prevention is always cheaper than correction.

0 coins

I'd be interested to hear how this turns out. We're probably due for a UCC audit ourselves - this thread is making me nervous about our own portfolio. Keep us posted on what approach works best.

0 coins

Yara Sabbagh

•

Will do. I'm hoping to have a game plan in place by next week. I'll update the thread once I've made some progress.

0 coins

Thanks, looking forward to the update. This kind of information is really valuable for all of us.

0 coins

Harper Thompson

Anyone know reliable TX UCC statement services for bulk filings?

My company handles equipment financing and we're drowning in UCC-1 filings for Texas. We've been doing everything manually through the SOS portal but with 40+ new deals monthly, it's becoming impossible to keep up. Need to find TX UCC statement services that can handle bulk submissions and actually get them right the first time. Last month we had 8 rejections due to debtor name formatting issues and it's killing our closing timelines. Anyone using a service provider that actually understands Texas SOS requirements? Looking for something more reliable than our current process.

Emma Swift

•

Been following this thread - curious about the Certana tool mentioned earlier. Does it work for other states too or just Texas?

0 coins

Jade O'Malley

•

It works for any state since it's just checking document consistency, not filing rules. We use it for multi-state deals all the time.

0 coins

Emma Swift

•

That's helpful. We do business in multiple states so a universal tool would be ideal.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the suggestions! Going to research CSC, CT Corp, and that Certana verification tool. The document checking before submission sounds like it could save us a lot of headaches.

0 coins

Ella Lewis

•

Definitely try the verification tool first - it's probably the cheapest way to solve your rejection problem.

0 coins

Anything to avoid dealing with Texas SOS rejections! Let us know how it works out.

0 coins

William Rivera

UCC Filing Issues with LMA Security Agreement - Name Variations Problem

Having major headaches with a UCC-1 filing tied to an LMA security agreement we executed last month. The borrower entity name appears slightly different between our loan docs and what's showing in the state business registry - they have 'Technologies Inc.' in one place and 'Technology Inc.' in another. Our compliance team is freaking out because the LMA security agreement references the exact corporate name from the charter, but when we pulled the SOS records there's this discrepancy. Filed the UCC-1 using the charter name but now wondering if we should have used the 'doing business as' variation instead. The collateral schedule covers all equipment and inventory but I'm worried about enforceability if the debtor name isn't perfect. Anyone dealt with similar name matching issues on LMA security agreements? This is a $2.8M facility so we can't afford to mess up the perfection.

Ella Thompson

•

One more thing to consider - make sure your LMA security agreement specifically addresses what happens if there are UCC filing errors or name discrepancies. Some agreements have provisions requiring the borrower to cooperate with corrective filings.

0 coins

I'll double-check our LMA security agreement language to make sure we have adequate protection for filing corrections. Seems like this type of issue is more common than I realized.

0 coins

JacksonHarris

•

Yeah it's definitely a common issue. I see name discrepancy problems on probably 10-15% of the LMA security agreement deals I review. Worth having standard language to address it.

0 coins

Update for anyone following this thread - I ended up filing UCC-1s under both name variations as suggested. Also ordered certified charter copies and used Certana.ai to verify document consistency. Found two other minor discrepancies in the collateral schedule that could have caused issues later. Thanks everyone for the practical advice!

0 coins

Jasmine Quinn

•

Glad the document verification tool helped catch those other issues. That's exactly the kind of thing that's easy to miss when reviewing everything manually.

0 coins

Royal_GM_Mark

•

Thanks for the update! This whole thread has been really helpful for understanding the complexities of UCC filings with LMA security agreements.

0 coins

Prev1...517518519520521...685Next