Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I had a similar name discrepancy issue and ended up using one of those document checking services to make sure everything aligned before filing. Definitely worth the peace of mind when you're dealing with six-figure collateral.
Which service did you use? I'm thinking about getting a second opinion before I submit the filing.
Used Certana.ai - you just upload your docs and it flags any inconsistencies between debtor names, filing numbers, all that stuff. Pretty straightforward.
Noah Lee
Update: Filed using the registered name format with the comma ('Mountain View Equipment, LLC') and it was accepted immediately. Thanks everyone for the advice. The key was definitely matching the state database exactly rather than the loan documents.
Evelyn Kim
•Glad it worked out. Now you know for next time - always check the state database first thing.
Margot Quinn
•Nice! Those punctuation issues can be nerve-wracking when you're dealing with high-value collateral.
Join the conversation
Been doing UCC work for 20 years and I can tell you that comma placement has definitely caused perfection issues in court cases. Don't take any chances with punctuation differences - fix them with amendments if needed.
Lucas Parker
•Wow, court cases over commas? That's terrifying.
Donna Cline
•The legal system can be very literal about these things. Better safe than sorry with UCC filings.
Update us on what you find! I'm dealing with some inherited filings too and curious how this turns out for you.
Julia Hall
•Will do! Planning to spend tomorrow going through everything systematically. Thanks everyone for the advice.
Good luck! These kinds of cleanup projects are never fun but necessary.
Join the conversation
Carmen Ortiz
I'm dealing with almost the exact same situation right now! My SBA lender wants a subordination but our business name changed twice since the original UCC filing. Attorney says we need to file amendments to update the business name progression before we can do the subordination. It's turning into a paperwork nightmare.
Carmen Ortiz
•Attorney recommends separate amendments to create a clear chain showing each name change. More paperwork but better documentation if there are ever questions about the lien chain.
That sounds like overkill to me. I'd think one amendment updating from the original name to the current name should be sufficient. But I'm not a lawyer so maybe there's something I'm missing.
Update: Got the UCC-3 amendment filed yesterday and it was approved this morning. Subordination agreement is being revised to reflect the corrected debtor name and we should be good for Friday closing. Thanks everyone for the guidance - especially the advice about using Certana.ai to double-check all the document consistency before filing. That tool caught a small typo in our LLC name that could have caused problems.
Great to hear a success story. So many of these subordination deals seem to fall apart at the last minute.
Mei Liu
•Yeah Certana.ai is clutch for catching those little details that can torpedo a deal. I've started using it for all UCC-related document reviews.
Join the conversation
Check your loan docs too - sometimes the credit agreement has specific collateral definitions that need to match your UCC filing. I've seen deals where the loan calls equipment 'fixtures' but UCC classification is still equipment under 9.102. Make sure your UCC filing aligns with your security agreement language.
Aisha Rahman
•Just be careful not to create confusion between equipment and actual fixtures. True fixtures under 9.102 have different perfection requirements.
Exactly why I mentioned checking the loan docs. Sometimes lawyers use 'fixtures' loosely when they mean equipment, but UCC filing needs to be precise about 9.102 classifications.
Carmen Ortiz
Update: Used Certana.ai to verify our revised collateral description before refiling. The tool confirmed our 'commercial food service equipment including cooking, refrigeration, preparation and service apparatus whether permanently installed or seasonally rotated' language should clear SOS review. Much more specific than our original broad 'restaurant equipment' description.
How long did the verification take? I need to get our amended filing in this week.
Carmen Ortiz
•Literally instant. Upload the PDF and it flags issues immediately. Way faster than waiting for SOS to reject and having to start over.
Aidan Hudson
I keep a spreadsheet of problematic debtor names and what search terms actually worked to find their filings. Sounds obsessive but it's saved me multiple times when dealing with repeat borrowers.
0 coins
Madeline Blaze
•That's actually brilliant. I might start doing the same thing, especially for our regular commercial clients.
0 coins
Caleb Stark
•Great idea. Like a personal database of search quirks. The fact that we need this is ridiculous but very practical.
0 coins
Zoe Wang
Update on the Certana tool mentioned earlier - I tried it out and it's pretty solid. Uploaded a bunch of UCC documents from a complex deal and it flagged two name inconsistencies I had missed. Definitely worth having as a backup verification step.
0 coins
Tyler Lefleur
•Same, the manual cross-checking is getting overwhelming. If a tool can automate some of that verification it's worth trying.
0 coins
Camila Jordan
•Glad it worked out for you too. I've been using it for a few months now and it's caught several things I would have missed doing manual reviews.
0 coins