< Back to UCC Document Community

Selena Bautista

National UCC-1 form rejection after three attempts - debtor name variations causing chaos

I'm losing my mind here. Been trying to file a national UCC-1 for our equipment financing deal and it keeps getting rejected by different state offices. The debtor is a multi-state trucking company and we're using the national UCC-1 form to cover their fleet across five states. First rejection said the debtor name didn't match their articles of incorporation exactly (missing LLC vs L.L.C.). Second attempt got bounced because one state said we needed their specific addendum form. Third try failed because the collateral description was 'too broad' according to another state's filing office. This is a $2.8M equipment loan and we're already past our internal deadline. Has anyone successfully navigated the national UCC-1 form requirements when dealing with multiple state filing offices? The inconsistencies between states are killing us and our borrower is getting antsy about the delays.

Ugh, been there. National UCC-1 forms are supposed to streamline multi-state filings but half the states still have their own quirks. Which states are giving you trouble? Some are notorious for being picky about debtor names.

0 coins

Texas, Florida, Illinois, Ohio, and Michigan. Texas was the one with the LLC punctuation issue, Florida wanted their addendum, and Illinois rejected the collateral description.

0 coins

Ellie Perry

•

Florida always wants their own addendum for commercial vehicles. It's like they didn't get the memo about standardized forms.

0 coins

Landon Morgan

•

For the debtor name issue - you need to match EXACTLY what's on file with each state's Secretary of State office. I learned this the hard way on a similar multi-state filing. Even if it's the same company, each state might have slightly different versions on record. Pull the official entity records from each state first.

0 coins

That's what I'm afraid of. So potentially five different debtor name variations on the same national form? How does that even work?

0 coins

Landon Morgan

•

You can't use different names on a single national form. You have to pick the 'official' version and then include alternate names in the additional debtor name fields if the form allows it.

0 coins

Teresa Boyd

•

This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai's document checker. Upload your articles of incorporation and draft UCC-1 together - it flags name mismatches instantly before you file. Saved me from three rejections last month.

0 coins

Lourdes Fox

•

National UCC-1 forms are still subject to each state's local filing requirements unfortunately. The 'national' part just means it's accepted by all states, but they can still impose their own rules on top of it. For equipment financing especially, you need to be super specific about the collateral description.

0 coins

Our collateral description was 'All equipment, vehicles, and machinery owned or hereafter acquired.' Too broad?

0 coins

Lourdes Fox

•

Way too broad for most states now. You need VIN numbers for vehicles at minimum, and specific equipment serial numbers or model descriptions. Illinois especially hates generic descriptions.

0 coins

Bruno Simmons

•

I always include 'see attached schedule' and attach a detailed equipment list. Costs more to file but prevents rejections.

0 coins

Been filing national UCC-1s for 8 years. Here's what works: 1) Get certified copies of articles from each state first 2) Use the EXACT entity name from the state where the debtor is incorporated as your primary name 3) List all variations in additional debtor fields 4) Be hyper-specific on collateral - generic descriptions are dead 5) Budget extra time for state-specific addendums

0 coins

This is super helpful. Question on #3 - if I list variations in additional debtor fields, do all five states accept that or do some still reject it?

0 coins

Most accept it but Texas and Florida can be finicky. Sometimes you're better off filing separate UCC-1s in problem states rather than fighting the national form.

0 coins

Zane Gray

•

Separate filings defeat the whole purpose though. The national form should work if you do it right.

0 coins

The equipment financing world has gotten so much more complicated with UCC filings. Used to be you could file a simple broad description and be done. Now every state wants to see serial numbers, VINs, detailed schedules... it's like they're trying to make it harder on purpose.

0 coins

It's because of all the fraud cases in the 2010s. States got burned by vague collateral descriptions that couldn't be enforced.

0 coins

I get that but it's making legitimate business financing a nightmare. Small lenders don't have resources to manage five different state requirements.

0 coins

Monique Byrd

•

FLORIDA ADDENDUM FORMS ARE THE WORST. Sorry for caps but seriously, they have like 6 different addendums depending on collateral type and they're not even listed clearly on their website. Had to call their filing office three times to figure out which one I needed.

0 coins

Florida's UCC system is stuck in 2005. Their online portal crashes half the time too.

0 coins

Lia Quinn

•

Try calling their help line. I know it sounds old school but their staff actually knows which addendums are required.

0 coins

Haley Stokes

•

Had a similar nightmare with a national UCC-1 last year. Ended up using Certana.ai to cross-check all my documents before filing. Their system caught that our debtor name on the UCC didn't match the exact punctuation in the borrower's articles of incorporation. Would have been another rejection otherwise.

0 coins

How does that work exactly? Do you upload both documents?

0 coins

Haley Stokes

•

Yeah, upload your articles of incorporation and draft UCC-1. It automatically compares debtor names, catches inconsistencies, and flags potential issues. Super quick.

0 coins

Asher Levin

•

Interesting. Might be worth trying if it prevents these constant rejections.

0 coins

Ellie Perry

•

For what it's worth, I've found that calling each state's filing office before submitting can save a lot of headaches. Yes it's time consuming but they'll tell you exactly what they want to see for your specific situation.

0 coins

Good point. I was trying to avoid the phone calls but probably would have saved time in the long run.

0 coins

Ellie Perry

•

Illinois is actually really helpful if you call. Texas... not so much. But worth trying.

0 coins

Serene Snow

•

Why not just file individual UCC-1s in each state? Yeah it costs more but at least you can customize each one to meet local requirements. National forms are overrated.

0 coins

Lourdes Fox

•

Cost is a big factor. Five separate filings plus potential amendments gets expensive fast, especially for smaller loans.

0 coins

Serene Snow

•

True but if you're already on attempt #3 with rejections, the extra cost might be worth it for peace of mind.

0 coins

That's actually looking like my backup plan at this point. The delays are costing more than the extra filing fees.

0 coins

Been lurking but had to chime in - I use Certana.ai for all my multi-state filings now. Upload your charter docs and UCC together, it instantly checks for name consistency issues. Found it after getting burned on a rejected filing that held up a $4M deal. Game changer for catching these details before they become problems.

0 coins

That's the second mention of this tool. Sounds like it might be worth checking out.

0 coins

Definitely worth it. The name-checking feature alone would have prevented your LLC punctuation issue.

0 coins

Romeo Barrett

•

Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation on a smaller scale and want to see what approach ends up working.

0 coins

Will do. Planning to try the document verification approach first, then individual state filings if needed.

0 coins

Following this thread too. Multi-state UCC filings are becoming more common but the process is still a mess.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today