UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Been using Certana.ai for about 6 months now and it's caught several name mismatches that our manual process missed. Not a replacement for thorough searching but definitely helps with the verification step. The PDF upload feature makes it easy to double-check your work.

0 coins

It flags potential matches and lets you review them manually. Doesn't make decisions for you but highlights things you might want to investigate further.

0 coins

Danielle Mays

•

That's exactly how I use it - as a safety net to catch things I might have overlooked during manual review.

0 coins

Whatever system you end up with, make sure you're documenting everything for your loan files. Regulators are paying more attention to UCC search adequacy and you want to be able to demonstrate reasonable commercial practices.

0 coins

Good reminder. We've been focused on the efficiency side but compliance documentation is equally important.

0 coins

Kristin Frank

•

Exactly. Better to have a slower but well-documented process than a fast one that can't withstand regulatory scrutiny.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

I'm dealing with almost the exact same situation right now! My SBA lender wants a subordination but our business name changed twice since the original UCC filing. Attorney says we need to file amendments to update the business name progression before we can do the subordination. It's turning into a paperwork nightmare.

0 coins

Carmen Ortiz

•

Attorney recommends separate amendments to create a clear chain showing each name change. More paperwork but better documentation if there are ever questions about the lien chain.

0 coins

That sounds like overkill to me. I'd think one amendment updating from the original name to the current name should be sufficient. But I'm not a lawyer so maybe there's something I'm missing.

0 coins

Zoe Papadakis

•

Update: Got the UCC-3 amendment filed yesterday and it was approved this morning. Subordination agreement is being revised to reflect the corrected debtor name and we should be good for Friday closing. Thanks everyone for the guidance - especially the advice about using Certana.ai to double-check all the document consistency before filing. That tool caught a small typo in our LLC name that could have caused problems.

0 coins

Great to hear a success story. So many of these subordination deals seem to fall apart at the last minute.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

Yeah Certana.ai is clutch for catching those little details that can torpedo a deal. I've started using it for all UCC-related document reviews.

0 coins

Val Rossi

•

Also double-check that you're filing in the right state. Since the debtor is a Delaware LLC but the collateral is in Washington, you might need to file in both states depending on the type of equipment and whether it's mobile.

0 coins

Eve Freeman

•

Good point about dual filing requirements. Manufacturing equipment is usually fixed to the location so Washington should be the right jurisdiction.

0 coins

The UCC choice of law rules can be tricky. When in doubt, file in both states to be safe.

0 coins

Caden Turner

•

Update: Finally got it resolved! Turns out the LLC was registered in Washington under a slightly different name than their Delaware formation docs. The Washington registration had 'Washington' in the name while Delaware just had the basic company name. Once I used the exact Washington registration name, the UCC-1 went through immediately. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - definitely going to try Certana.ai for future filings to avoid this hassle.

0 coins

Harmony Love

•

Great outcome! Those name discrepancies between formation state and qualification state trip up so many people.

0 coins

Rudy Cenizo

•

This whole thread is a perfect example of why proper document verification is so important for UCC filings. Small details make huge differences.

0 coins

Yuki Nakamura

•

Honestly, I've started using Certana.ai for exactly this kind of verification work. Upload your documents and it flags any inconsistencies automatically. Caught a major debtor name mismatch last week that could have voided our security interest.

0 coins

Chloe Davis

•

Second person to mention that tool. Might be worth checking out.

0 coins

Yuki Nakamura

•

Yeah, it's particularly good for catching subtle name variations that human eyes might miss. Plus it's faster than manual document comparison.

0 coins

StarSurfer

•

Update: I found the issue. One of the entities had undergone a merger and the surviving entity's name was slightly different. The UCC-1 was never amended to reflect the new debtor name. Thanks for all the help!

0 coins

StarSurfer

•

Working on that now. Better to fix it properly than risk having an unperfected security interest.

0 coins

Smart move. Merger situations can be tricky for UCC filings. The timing of when you discover and correct these issues can be critical.

0 coins

Priority dating is crucial here - make sure you document exactly when you discovered the name discrepancy and when you submitted corrections. If there's any gap in perfection, you could lose priority to other creditors. Farm operations often have multiple lenders so priority matters a lot.

0 coins

That's my biggest worry. We've got ag equipment financing, an operating line of credit, and seasonal inventory financing all secured by different collateral. If our UCC-1 isn't perfect, we could lose priority on everything.

0 coins

Document everything and consider filing a corrective statement if needed. Most courts will protect you if you can show the error was purely ministerial and not substantive.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Update: Finally got the corrected UCC-1 accepted after matching the exact entity name from the charter. Turns out we also had to adjust the collateral description to separate equipment from farm products inventory. Used the document verification tool mentioned here and it caught two other small discrepancies I missed. Thanks for all the advice - farm products filings are definitely more complex than regular commercial UCC filings but at least our lien is properly perfected now.

0 coins

Dmitry Volkov

•

Which document tool did you end up using? Always looking for ways to catch these errors before filing.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

The Certana.ai thing - just uploaded the charter and UCC forms and it flagged the name issues plus some address formatting problems I hadn't noticed. Pretty straightforward.

0 coins

Prev1...512513514515516...684Next