UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Dananyl Lear

•

Just remembered - if you do end up trying the Certana document checker, it's great for future filings too. I now run all my UCC documents through it before submitting to catch these issues early.

0 coins

Aidan Percy

•

Prevention is definitely better than panic-fixing at deadline time.

0 coins

Dananyl Lear

•

Exactly! Much less stressful to catch problems during preparation.

0 coins

Hope this thread helps other people dealing with UCC 107 errors. The debtor name formatting issue seems to be super common but not well documented anywhere official.

0 coins

Ayla Kumar

•

Definitely! The error code itself tells you nothing useful.

0 coins

Right, you have to rely on community knowledge to figure out what's actually wrong.

0 coins

Cameron Black

•

This thread is giving me anxiety about my own UCC search I did last week. Now I'm wondering if I missed something important because of name variations. Going to go back and double-check everything.

0 coins

Better to catch it now than after your deal closes. UCC name matching rules can be really strict depending on the state.

0 coins

I learned this the hard way - always better to over-search than under-search when it comes to UCC due diligence.

0 coins

Ruby Garcia

•

Final update: I used Certana.ai to analyze all the documents and it confirmed that two of the filings were the same entity with different name formats, and one was actually a related subsidiary. The continuation in Texas was properly filed and still active. Closing went smoothly once I had everything sorted out. Thanks everyone for the guidance!

0 coins

Glad it worked out! This is exactly why proper UCC verification is so important before closing.

0 coins

Thanks for following up with the resolution. Helps the rest of us learn from your experience.

0 coins

Just file the UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name and move on. These system glitches happen but they're easy enough to fix. Make sure you reference the original filing number and clearly state you're correcting a debtor name error.

0 coins

I wouldn't overcomplicate it. Just state that you're amending to correct the debtor name to the full legal entity name.

0 coins

Jason Brewer

•

Agreed. Keep the amendment language simple and straightforward.

0 coins

This thread is making me realize I should probably audit all our Illinois UCC filings. Anyone know of a good way to bulk verify that continuation filings didn't mess up the original information?

0 coins

Wesley Hallow

•

Certana.ai actually has a bulk verification feature where you can upload multiple documents for cross-checking. Perfect for this kind of audit situation.

0 coins

That sounds exactly like what I need. Thanks for the recommendation.

0 coins

Update us when you refile! Always curious to hear what the actual issue was with these vague 9-508 rejection notices. The filing offices really need to be more specific about what fails their sufficiency standards instead of just citing the statute.

0 coins

LunarEclipse

•

Good luck! Hope it goes through cleanly this time.

0 coins

Yara Khalil

•

These 9-508 issues are so frustrating when you're trying to close a loan on schedule.

0 coins

Keisha Brown

•

One more thought on UCC 9-508 - make sure your debtor address exactly matches what's on file with the state too. Some filing offices consider address discrepancies as part of their sufficiency determination, especially if the address is completely wrong or missing required elements like suite numbers.

0 coins

Keisha Brown

•

That could definitely contribute to a 9-508 rejection. Entity addresses change more often than you'd think.

0 coins

Always better to be safe and use the most current registered address for UCC filings.

0 coins

ThunderBolt7

•

Quick question - are you doing this for all the entities in the corporate family or just the main target? Sometimes lenders cross-collateralize across multiple entities.

0 coins

ThunderBolt7

•

Might be worth doing searches on the key subsidiaries too, especially if they have significant assets.

0 coins

Jamal Edwards

•

We ran into this exact issue on a deal last year. Thought we had clear title but there was a blanket lien covering subsidiaries that we missed. Certana.ai's document checker would have caught that - it flags when collateral descriptions are broad enough to cover multiple entities.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

Don't forget to request continuation information if any of the filings are getting close to their 5-year expiration. A lien that's about to lapse might not be worth worrying about.

0 coins

Good point. Some of the filings we saw in the preliminary search are from 2019-2020 timeframe.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

Those would be coming up for continuation soon. Check if continuation statements have been filed to see if the liens are still being maintained.

0 coins

Prev1...512513514515516...684Next