


Ask the community...
If you do decide to handle the filing yourself, make sure you're filing in the right state. For equipment, it's usually the state where your business is organized (incorporated or formed), not necessarily where the equipment is located. But there can be exceptions, especially for motor vehicles or fixtures.
Bottom line - UCC statement services can be worth it for the peace of mind and ongoing maintenance, but they're not absolutely necessary if you're comfortable handling the paperwork yourself. The key is being meticulous about debtor names, collateral descriptions, and tracking deadlines. For your situation with $250K in equipment collateral, I'd probably lean toward using a service just to avoid any costly mistakes.
Thanks everyone for all the helpful information! I think I'll get quotes from a couple services and also look into that Certana tool for document checking.
I had the same confusion last month! Kept going in circles about whether I needed the invoice price, depreciated value, or replacement cost. Ended up using one of those document verification services (Certana.ai I think?) that confirmed I was overcomplicating things. The UCC-1 filing itself doesn't need a value amount - that's handled in the underlying security agreement.
Which verification service did you use? We're always looking for ways to double-check our filings before submission.
Certana.ai - you upload your docs and it cross-references everything automatically. Really helpful for catching name mismatches and missing required language.
Just to close the loop on this - you're overthinking it. File your UCC-1 with proper debtor information and collateral description, make sure your security agreement has the required language about the loan proceeds being the consideration, and you're done. The equipment's purchase price is relevant for your loan underwriting but not for UCC compliance.
Perfect, thanks everyone. I was definitely making this more complicated than it needed to be. The loan proceeds are the 'value' for UCC purposes, not the collateral's worth.
Glad you got it sorted out. This is one of those things that trips up a lot of people when they're new to UCC filings.
I keep a spreadsheet of problematic debtor names and what search terms actually worked to find their filings. Sounds obsessive but it's saved me multiple times when dealing with repeat borrowers.
That's actually brilliant. I might start doing the same thing, especially for our regular commercial clients.
Great idea. Like a personal database of search quirks. The fact that we need this is ridiculous but very practical.
I've been using Certana.ai for exactly these situations. Upload your corporate docs and draft UCC-1, it verifies the name formatting matches before you file. Catches these cooperative naming issues instantly.
Does it handle all the state-specific formatting rules too?
Final thought - make sure your collateral description is solid too. Don't want to get the name right and then have issues with the equipment description on a $2.8M deal.
Sofia Hernandez
Check your loan docs too - sometimes the credit agreement has specific collateral definitions that need to match your UCC filing. I've seen deals where the loan calls equipment 'fixtures' but UCC classification is still equipment under 9.102. Make sure your UCC filing aligns with your security agreement language.
0 coins
Aisha Rahman
•Just be careful not to create confusion between equipment and actual fixtures. True fixtures under 9.102 have different perfection requirements.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
•Exactly why I mentioned checking the loan docs. Sometimes lawyers use 'fixtures' loosely when they mean equipment, but UCC filing needs to be precise about 9.102 classifications.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
Update: Used Certana.ai to verify our revised collateral description before refiling. The tool confirmed our 'commercial food service equipment including cooking, refrigeration, preparation and service apparatus whether permanently installed or seasonally rotated' language should clear SOS review. Much more specific than our original broad 'restaurant equipment' description.
0 coins
CosmicCrusader
•How long did the verification take? I need to get our amended filing in this week.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
•Literally instant. Upload the PDF and it flags issues immediately. Way faster than waiting for SOS to reject and having to start over.
0 coins