UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

The silver lining is that once you get this cleaned up, you'll have a much better process going forward. Sounds like this could be a blessing in disguise to overhaul your whole UCC procedure.

0 coins

Yara Sabbagh

•

That's definitely the plan. We're already looking at implementing better checks and balances to prevent this from happening again.

0 coins

Smart. Prevention is always cheaper than correction.

0 coins

I'd be interested to hear how this turns out. We're probably due for a UCC audit ourselves - this thread is making me nervous about our own portfolio. Keep us posted on what approach works best.

0 coins

Yara Sabbagh

•

Will do. I'm hoping to have a game plan in place by next week. I'll update the thread once I've made some progress.

0 coins

Thanks, looking forward to the update. This kind of information is really valuable for all of us.

0 coins

Dyllan Nantx

•

For future reference, I keep a backup plan for situations like this. There are private search companies that can pull UCC data when the state portals are down, though they charge more. Worth having their contact info for emergencies.

0 coins

Could you share some names? I'd rather pay extra than miss a deadline.

0 coins

Dyllan Nantx

•

I'll send you a private message with the ones I've used. Don't want to advertise on here.

0 coins

Update: just tried again this morning and the portal seems to be working better. Still not perfect but at least my searches are completing. Might have been a temporary issue that's getting resolved.

0 coins

Anna Xian

•

Just tried too and you're right, it's definitely improved from yesterday.

0 coins

Dananyl Lear

•

Still being cautious and doing small batches though. Don't want to jinx it!

0 coins

Update: I pulled the actual charter documents and found that the legal name is 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' without the comma. The filing with the comma was done by a different lender who apparently didn't verify the exact legal name. This means that filing might not be enforceable, which changes the priority analysis significantly. Still working on identifying the third filing but this helps narrow things down.

0 coins

Kyle Wallace

•

This is a perfect example of why exact debtor names matter so much. That other lender might have an unenforceable security interest without realizing it.

0 coins

Ryder Ross

•

Just curious - did you use any automated tools to verify the charter documents against the UCC filings? Manual comparison can miss subtle differences.

0 coins

Final update: Turned out the third filing was under a previous DBA that the company used before converting to LLC status. The secured party confirmed it was terminated when they switched to the LLC structure but never filed a UCC-3 termination. So effectively only one active lien to worry about. Thanks everyone for the help working through this - definitely learned to be more thorough with name variations and entity history.

0 coins

Olivia Kay

•

Classic case of sloppy record keeping by the secured party. They should have filed the termination when the entity structure changed.

0 coins

Joshua Hellan

•

This is why I always verify entity formation history in addition to current status. DBAs and previous entity names can create phantom liens in search results.

0 coins

Emma Swift

•

Been following this thread - curious about the Certana tool mentioned earlier. Does it work for other states too or just Texas?

0 coins

Jade O'Malley

•

It works for any state since it's just checking document consistency, not filing rules. We use it for multi-state deals all the time.

0 coins

Emma Swift

•

That's helpful. We do business in multiple states so a universal tool would be ideal.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the suggestions! Going to research CSC, CT Corp, and that Certana verification tool. The document checking before submission sounds like it could save us a lot of headaches.

0 coins

Ella Lewis

•

Definitely try the verification tool first - it's probably the cheapest way to solve your rejection problem.

0 coins

Anything to avoid dealing with Texas SOS rejections! Let us know how it works out.

0 coins

Make sure you're not copying and pasting from a PDF. Sometimes that introduces hidden characters that cause rejections. Type everything manually from the official state records.

0 coins

Julian Paolo

•

I did copy from the SOS website. I'll try typing it manually next time.

0 coins

PDF copy-paste has burned me before. Always type manually for UCC filings.

0 coins

Ethan Scott

•

Any update on this? Did you get it resolved? I'm dealing with a similar issue in Washington and could use some guidance.

0 coins

Ethan Scott

•

Fingers crossed! Let us know how it goes.

0 coins

Lola Perez

•

Hope it works out. Washington's system really needs to be more user-friendly.

0 coins

Prev1...511512513514515...684Next