md sdat ucc search showing weird results - anyone else having issues?
So I'm trying to run a md sdat ucc search on a debtor for a equipment financing deal and the results are just... strange. The debtor name is showing up but with completely different filing numbers than what I have in my records. I've got a UCC-1 that was filed last year with filing number 202400987654 but when I search the exact debtor name in the system, it's pulling up 202300445678 instead. Same exact business name, same address, but totally different filing number. Has anyone run into this before? I'm worried there might be duplicate filings or something got messed up in the system. This is for a $350K equipment loan and I need to make sure our lien position is solid before we close. The continuation isn't due until 2029 so that's not the issue. Really confused about why the search results don't match my filing records.
33 comments


Victoria Scott
I've seen this happen before - usually means there are multiple filings on the same debtor. Did you try searching by filing number directly instead of debtor name? Sometimes the name search algorithm picks up variations or partial matches.
0 coins
Ezra Collins
•Yeah I tried that too. When I search by my filing number it comes up fine, but the debtor name search keeps pulling the other one. Really strange.
0 coins
Benjamin Johnson
•This exact thing happened to me last month! Turned out the debtor had filed under a slightly different business name variation and the search was defaulting to the older filing.
0 coins
Zara Perez
Check if there's a name change or DBA situation. Sometimes businesses file under their legal name but operate under a trade name, and you'll get different results depending on which name you search.
0 coins
Ezra Collins
•Good point - I'll check their corporate records to see if there were any name changes between the two filing dates.
0 coins
Daniel Rogers
•Also check if one might be a termination of the other filing. The older number could be a terminated UCC that's still showing up in search results.
0 coins
Aaliyah Reed
Had a similar nightmare with conflicting search results last year. Ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool to upload both UCC filings and cross-check everything. It instantly flagged that one was actually an amendment to the other, not a separate filing. Saved me from a major headache.
0 coins
Ezra Collins
•Never heard of that tool - does it work with the state search results or do you have to have the actual documents?
0 coins
Aaliyah Reed
•You upload the PDF documents and it cross-checks all the details - debtor names, filing numbers, collateral descriptions. Really helpful when search results are confusing like this.
0 coins
Ella Russell
•I use that too - it's great for catching discrepancies that manual review might miss, especially with complex debtor name variations.
0 coins
Mohammed Khan
Are you absolutely sure about the debtor name spelling? Even one letter off can cause the search to pull different results. I've seen filings where the debtor name has a comma in one but not the other, or Inc vs Incorporated.
0 coins
Ezra Collins
•I'm pretty careful with that stuff but let me double-check. The business name does have some punctuation that might be causing issues.
0 coins
Gavin King
•Yeah punctuation and abbreviations are notorious for causing search problems. Always worth checking variations.
0 coins
Nathan Kim
This is exactly why I hate the MD SDAT system!!! The search function is garbage and never pulls the right results. Half the time it doesn't find filings that definitely exist, and the other half it shows you random stuff that doesn't match.
0 coins
Eleanor Foster
•Tell me about it. I've had clients almost lose deals because the search results were so unreliable.
0 coins
Ezra Collins
•At least I'm not the only one having issues with it. Thought I was going crazy.
0 coins
Lucas Turner
•The whole system needs an overhaul. Other states have much better UCC search interfaces.
0 coins
Kai Rivera
Pull both filings and compare them side by side. Look at the filing dates, secured parties, and collateral descriptions. One might be an amendment or continuation of the other.
0 coins
Ezra Collins
•That's my plan - just wanted to see if anyone else had run into this weird search behavior first.
0 coins
Anna Stewart
•Good approach. Sometimes what looks like duplicate filings is actually a proper filing chain that the search results don't display clearly.
0 coins
Layla Sanders
Could be a system glitch too. I've seen temporary issues where the search index gets out of sync with the actual filing database. Try searching again in a few hours.
0 coins
Ezra Collins
•I've been checking periodically for the past two days - same results every time.
0 coins
Morgan Washington
•If it persists, you might need to call the filing office directly. Sometimes they can explain what's going on with specific search anomalies.
0 coins
Kaylee Cook
Just went through something similar with a client's UCC search showing multiple filing numbers. Turned out the older filing was actually a fixture filing that got converted to a regular UCC when they moved locations. The search was pulling both records.
0 coins
Ezra Collins
•Interesting - this debtor does have real estate involved so that could be it.
0 coins
Oliver Alexander
•Fixture filings definitely complicate search results. The conversion process sometimes leaves traces of the original filing.
0 coins
Lara Woods
I would definitely verify the chain of title on both filings before proceeding with your loan. With that much money involved, you can't afford to have lien priority issues down the road.
0 coins
Ezra Collins
•Absolutely - that's why I'm being so paranoid about getting this sorted out properly.
0 coins
Adrian Hughes
•Smart move. I've seen deals fall apart months later when lien priority gets challenged because of filing irregularities.
0 coins
Molly Chambers
•For what it's worth, I ran into a similar situation and used Certana.ai to verify all my UCC documents were consistent. Found out I had a debtor name mismatch that could have voided the filing. Worth checking especially with equipment financing where the collateral moves around.
0 coins
Ian Armstrong
Update us when you figure out what's going on! This kind of search weirdness always makes me nervous about what else might be lurking in the system that we don't catch.
0 coins
Ezra Collins
•Will do - hopefully it's something simple like a name variation issue.
0 coins
Eli Butler
•Yeah these search mysteries always have me second-guessing everything else I've filed.
0 coins